Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
twodave
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
36 ms
·
601.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
Still remember my original SC cd key from installing it on all my friends computers back in the day :) 4015-29374-2985 probably will always be rattling around there somewhere. Useless information taking up space.
602.
▲
Configuring WSL for Docker
(dsheldon.com)
1 points
by
twodave
4y ago
|
0 comments
603.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
Or just work someplace small for a while. You’ll end up with multi role experience because that’s what small companies are like.
604.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
Convenience for managers is the only reason I can imagine, but I'm sure there are some others. I.e. you can easily tell who's working/not by looking around vs having to get somebody to build you a recurring report or whatever
605.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
Depends on the kind of work. If your "job" is pure data entry or smashing out code without any thought, then this might be a way to measure. It's still not necessary, though, since in that case it's a stupid job and you
606.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
[ title: You have been inactive for a while ] [ dialog: To help keep your account secure, you will be signed out in approximately 1 minute. ] [ button: Keep me signed in] [ button: Sign out ] [ maybe a link: Why am I seeing this? ]
607.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
Fighting? This isn't fighting. This is called "being heard".
608.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
Better title: AImong Us
609.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
Thanks for taking the time to explain. You’ve helped me revise my opinion (yes, some folks are willing to receive new information and change haha).
610.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
How is this different than a REST API with an open api spec? I suppose GraphQL APIs are just more likely to have introspection turned on since it’s the default?
611.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
Thanks, this is thought-provoking. I went and did some reading—-am I mistaken for thinking simply disabling introspection in production is a hard counter to this? I realize for a public API (or API product) that isn’t super helpful, but for
612.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
Yes, you’re correct. The title sucks.
613.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
Well, at least we are speaking the same language, finally. Only I think we just genuinely disagree on some definitions. To me, it could be written “unethical to use in a professional setting” and I’d agree wholeheartedly. To me, this is the
614.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
I like GraphQL because it allows me to describe my API like a domain rather than just a collection of resources. REST is difficult to map to a true domain model because domains aren't just collections of resources. They have nuance. An
615.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
I never spoke with any authority. I'm just another name on the Internet. In my originally comment I intentionally didn't speak in concrete terms about whether it's appropriate or not for that photo to be used (I actually pers
616.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
That's not true. I qualified the statement with "potentially" because I don't know whether she regrets it or not. The article title implies the image was sourced unethically, and my whole point was whether she regrets th
617.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
> Why are you doubling down on your assumption that this is about Lena without you knowing what actually happened? What makes you assume she didn’t know full well the image was not under her control? What makes you assume control over th
618.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
They can. It still doesn't make the use or origin of those photos unethical.
619.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
I didn't say it _can't be_ unethical. I just said it isn't necessarily. Ethics is a fairly narrow definition, and I'm not sure you can apply it as broadly as, "Anytime one party has leverage over another, there'
620.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
Evidence? Why would I need any? There is no unethical origin of that photo, as the article claims there is. The burden isn't on me to prove non-existence, that's silly. But fair enough, I've clearly missed a bit of context. I
621.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
That class of thinking is exactly what she should have considered, though I'd have phrased it more generally: "These photos will not be under my control, therefore they could show up anywhere at anytime in the future, and there&#
622.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
May I instead suggest avoiding asking loaded questions? Nothing I said precludes me from having compassion for this person. My point is that it's just not an ethical concern.
623.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
I don't agree, since she was paid (and presumably she could attempt to buy the rights back if she felt really passionate about this). An example of an actual ethics issue would be e.g. the NCAA barring athletes from profiting from thei
624.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
I was expecting to read some story about criminal exploitation, but this sounds like it's just... completely above-board? As a few other commenters stated, the model hasn't explicitly stated whether she supports the use of the pho
625.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
You shouldn't try. Assume the best and move on. This is just basic manners.
626.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
Not to mention the many various ways restaurants skirt the law with regard to overtime/doubletime. I've seen a lot of ways they screw this up, but perhaps the most common is by using the tipped employee minimum hourly wage (usuall
627.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
Now it’s just a major pain in my butt. At least the ones on phones. Half the time they replace a legitimate word with the one they thought I actually meant. They’re almost always wrong.
628.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
Wachovia[0], perhaps? [0] https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/testimony/alvarez2...
629.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
And if your project is open source and the docs are clear and show good vision, you might even attract folks to come fix your broke-ass code :D
630.
▲
by
twodave
4y ago
I'd even take this hot take up a few more degrees and say the docs quality not only represents the product quality, but also validates it. In other words, you can't know whether your product has a chance of being good unless you&#
More ›