tw1984

4 ms·

31.
by tw1984 3mo ago
basically they give you a few hours free electricity in exchange for significantly higher electricity prices for the rest of the day. basically a free IQ test.
32.
by tw1984 3mo ago
nice straw man, you can of course find houses below $1m when you go to regional areas where job opportunities simply do not exist. how about you just compare construction cost in Sydney with say those expensive part of the US, e.g. LA and S
33.
by tw1984 3mo ago
To launch a starlink style system, you need to be able to rapidly design and produce hundreds of thousands satellites and launch them within relatively short period of time with extremely high success rate. only the largest industrialized n
34.
by tw1984 3mo ago
your numbers are completely meaningless. it is well known that Australia has an extremely lazy workforce that refuse to put in any real work. the best example here is the stupid residential building cost. nowadays it costs over $1m AUD or $
35.
by tw1984 3mo ago
“answering correctly on a machine that costs less than one H100 fan” really love such comparison.
36.
by tw1984 3mo ago
> I really appreciate the focus on intelligence WITH token efficiency that is a polite way of saying "I don't believe AGI is coming anytime soon".
37.
by tw1984 3mo ago
> What if the majority of the ancestors of some individual Anglo Saxon Australians immigrated in the 1980s. so these people moved there in the 1980s knowing the aboriginals have been wiped out without getting compensated whatsoever? soun
38.
by tw1984 3mo ago
very interesting results! GLM performed extremely well. we need GLM-6!
39.
by tw1984 3mo ago
You need to be totally evil in your soul trying to downplay such non-western-centric voices. I asked ChatGPT whether Anglo Saxon Australians have the legal and moral obligation to fully compensate for Australian Aboriginals for the genocide
40.
by tw1984 3mo ago
> GLM is the model that will sink the frontier labs. this is the claim you are making here, no one else claimed that. two obvious issues here - 1. GLM itself is a frontier lab, ranked No.3 in the world in July 2026, ahead of Google, Meta
41.
by tw1984 3mo ago
they better get that out fast, it will become totally meaningless when the next GLM gets there first. more competition is always good for consumers.
42.
by tw1984 3mo ago
from memory, it is like 96-98% of the accuracy.
43.
by tw1984 3mo ago
40 years ago, when the CCP was leading its people making toys and socks for the US, people like you who never made any change to the world were talking such ideological nonsense. 40 years on, when the CCP is leading its people making AI, ro
44.
by tw1984 3mo ago
resellers wouldn't be trying to sell such junk in the first place. they use faked models to avoid the cost of Opus tokens, not to double dip to scam those with arguably the highest IQ in the country.
45.
by tw1984 3mo ago
> Another data point on this is the black market for Claude tokens in China [1]. The chat logs themselves are a commodity to train models. anyone with IQ higher than 130 (thus qualified for actual AI R&D) would be questioning somethi
46.
by tw1984 3mo ago
> Chinese labs are also still behind, so they’re incentivized to collaborate and have no reason to do it in private. US labs in Google, Meta and SpaceX are not leading, none of them managed to build something on par with GLM 5.2. Care to
47.
by tw1984 3mo ago
what make you believe that the Chinese gov is going to allow GLM-6 to be made publicly available?
48.
by tw1984 3mo ago
> Who cares if another country didn’t take advantage of globalism? selling your western centric view in 2026 is just laughable.
49.
by tw1984 4mo ago
a company can just download GLM 5.2 and start self hosting this model using the chip designed and made by itself. That could lower the cost by 20-30x. for hobbyist buying a few Mac Studio to host GLM 5.2 at home, the cost might 10x more tha
50.
by tw1984 4mo ago
> China has done both despite globalism being what has lifted it from poverty. such oversimplification on steroids is totally misleading. globalism was never invented or promoted to help any country in poverty, it was designed to extract
51.
by tw1984 4mo ago
pretty cool, now wait for the Chinese to list this company as national security threat and ban selling any parts to it. oh, wait, that is what Americans do.
52.
by tw1984 4mo ago
deepset? more like deadseek. no, thanks, never going to use that.
53.
by tw1984 4mo ago
what you said above is only true when the AI is not as smart/professional/knowledgable as that engineer.
54.
by tw1984 4mo ago
LEO is the future, if they somehow switch to starlink, I'd consider it as a big win, actually a huuuge win.
55.
by tw1984 4mo ago
> At the same time, none of these companies will use a Chinese API for their employees. nice try but you intentionally ignored the entire Chinese market & Chinese big corporates. there are 130 Chinese companies in the fortune 500 lis
56.
by tw1984 4mo ago
US is not even investing in GPS anymore. Their L5 signal has been in experimental operation for probably over a decade, still "experimental".
57.
by tw1984 4mo ago
Mao started doing that after becoming the "CEO", not the other way around.
58.
by tw1984 4mo ago
what is more interesting to me is why it takes so long for them to support vision. does it implies that Liang believes vision/voice is less important on its way to AGI?
59.
by tw1984 4mo ago
> how HF can afford to be a CDN for such huge files bandwidth and storage are literally free when compared to the cost of GPU clusters. HF gets rewarded heavily on capital market for being in AI without actually doing much AI stuff, that
60.
by tw1984 4mo ago
> The best chinese models are deepseek (general purpose) DeepSeek is developed by the largest Chinese hedge fund, their models used to make them $ on the share market are very profitable, they've never ever released anything on thos

More ›