tvink

7 ms·

61.
by tvink 3y ago
"a power play to get those with power to bow down to those without; which is just another form of psychological oppression imho" I disagree, but even if it is, maybe that's ok. Status quo is active oppression everywhere all t
62.
by tvink 4y ago
I don't think that it's obvious that that will ever be the case. Service providers have poor incentives to make your content movable, much less your following.
63.
by tvink 4y ago
"does this" is maybe a little misleading here. Facebook has their own platform which they monitor. Like or not, that's something very different than mandating that every system should have a backdoor.
64.
by tvink 4y ago
Different industries have different fraud rates and different legal difficulties around the globe. It might not be a good enough reason from your perspective to blanket ban them, but exclusion based on different legal overhead or risk profi
65.
by tvink 4y ago
I think the Stable Diffusion moment is very dependant on someone creating a commercially licensable version of this somehow. I think the prospect of never being able to put your creations in a product is too inhibitive for the hypergrowth s
66.
by tvink 4y ago
I've migrated too, but the biggest letdown for me so far is the total absence of genre playlists. If you're lucky you'll find 3 playlists by users when you search for something like "Deep House", it's really no
67.
by tvink 4y ago
To quote the Bitcoin Whitepaper: >A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution It's fine that we've mov
68.
by tvink 4y ago
"Creating jobs" to inefficiently solve a solved task is not a good thing, it is society burning it's tax income. It is only good to create jobs when the output of those jobs is increased value.