tux3

42 ms·

511.
by tux3 2y ago
A redeeming factor is that approximately no one is using the SVT-AV1 decoder, it's almost only for encodes, where you don't care as much since there's nothing privileged in your encoding container besides the current input be
512.
by tux3 2y ago
Even if this is obviously true, that does nothing to support the original statement. That's a whole different claim that you had to fall back to. Which is a motte-and-bailey type of argument.
513.
by tux3 2y ago
Zero chance, unfortunately. The cause of tinnitus is not with the OTOF gene. The best case scenario is that this wouldn't do anything.
514.
by tux3 2y ago
Trying to figure out which melody was which in an emergency doesn't seem like the most human-friendly. Contrast with the GPWS warnings in aviation, which tells you what the problem is (TERRAIN TERRAIN) and what to do (PULL UP) in a pro
515.
by tux3 2y ago
The stop condition is that the bots just die miserably after sitting around, because they run out of items, or the monsters scale faster than them, or they run into one of the thousands of funny/stupid ways you can die in NetHack. Ther
516.
by tux3 2y ago
That's just any big framework. Porting a large codebase between major releases of GTK (or Javascript frameworks) isn't much better.
517.
by tux3 2y ago
That number theory book looks like something I'd really enjoy reading. I assume you must have enjoyed the experience, but I'm curious how easy it is for everyone to move at the same pace on such a technical topic, where everyone m
518.
by tux3 2y ago
Only questions are closed as duplicates. Stackoverflow is strict and pedantic to the point of being very unfriendly to newbies, but it doesn't close things at random. If you want to criticize Stackoverflow, there's plenty of solid
519.
by tux3 2y ago
Very common might vary by area. If you work near the foundations, I could see that, sure.
520.
by tux3 2y ago
Complexity has different meanings. People don't generally go and assign objective metrics of complexity to proofs, besides how long it is. You could try to draw the stack of abstractions necessary to understand the proof and see how hi
521.
by tux3 2y ago
Just another way too much heat can threaten your ONI run :)
522.
by tux3 2y ago
It's not useful if you're trying to measure the tradeoff, but it paints a clear picture for everyday use. If I'm just loading a web-page or playing a non-AAA game like Terarria, I don't care whether I get 300fps or 200fp
523.
by tux3 2y ago
It's fairly easy to make a turing machine that goes exponential and blows up forever. But the really tricky part to understand is why it eventually stops . After an unimaginably high number of steps.
524.
by tux3 2y ago
Or rather, have a reputable source write an article about your work. If you write the news article about your own work and they publish it, the article is still a primary source (despite not being self-published)!
525.
by tux3 2y ago
They sure are! I think the parent comment to mine was edited, and now my reply looks weird. This is what I remember replying to: "If you want monetary compensation you should not be contributing to Wikipedia"
526.
by tux3 2y ago
>We trust the consensus of published, peer-reviewed experts. That's different than the kind of Demos that does things like declare war on Persia, kill Jesus and Socrates, or edit Wikipedia. Ye of little faith! The Demos, after much
527.
by tux3 2y ago
>it won't allow you to directly quote a person even though they are a well known trustworthy information source Little known fact: That is actually allowed in some limited situations, but only reluctantly, and with a lot of care. Fo
528.
by tux3 2y ago
After seeing this comment, onlookers report that the Wikimedia Foundation appears to have just vanished in a puff of volunteerism
529.
by tux3 2y ago
That's exactly what almost all knowledge is. When was it that you last verified something by yourself, with an experiment? You didn't test the things you know. You know things because you could see they were the consensus, and so
530.
by tux3 2y ago
The source is in Mercurial (like most code from Mozilla), not GitHub. There's instructions on developer.thunderbird.net.
531.
by tux3 2y ago
No. Projects sometimes stop offering the previous license and start using a different one for new work . But if your project is Apache-2, you cannot take away someone's license after the fact. You can only stop giving away new Apache-
532.
by tux3 2y ago
Thanks for the explanation, appreciate it Have a good day as well <3
533.
by tux3 2y ago
I feel like not being able to treat data as code and code as data limits the strategy a lot. You can't read what code is in a cell, you can only read and write data. So you can't do self-modifying code, beyond blindly copying an e
534.
by tux3 2y ago
How close is broad ballpark, have you tried chromaprint? It's probably far from state of the art today, but you can get a percentage similarity out of it. I've successfully used it to find similar (or outright duplicate) songs in
535.
by tux3 2y ago
I'm sure the sysadmins can restart us. They do have backups, right?
536.
by tux3 2y ago
It can be difficult to discuss technical issues inside an enterprise, but if it turns into a social liability, either you enterprise culture is extraordinarily corrosive to the soul, or what you're doing is culture war. The words they
537.
by tux3 2y ago
There's a lot of truth to be found out there that is useful, technical, and utterly devoid of public attention. But if the truth-seeking you're thinking of is being a culture war truther, that'd certainly explain the woes.
538.
by tux3 2y ago
Looks like it's still offered for purchase: https://www.soflow.com/en/warenkorb/?add-to-cart=1098
539.
by tux3 2y ago
It's a physical ticket vending machine, not a web page. The whole machine is a giant popup, you walk up to it with the intent to buy something.
540.
by tux3 2y ago
Okay team, when can we supercharge this?

More ›