tutfbhuf

44 ms·

451.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
Since parenthesis are just an arbritary sign, it's possible to replace it with something different that fulfills the same role in Lisp. An example for Lisp without parenthesis: https://dustycloud.org/blog/wisp-lisp
452.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
Maybe someone could try to install Wayland on an old device, where latest Xorg works fast, and see if Wayland also does. Comparison video would be nice.
453.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
> first one I've ever had where I can watch youtube, or vlc/mpv at 60fps without flickering, dropping frames or tearing Have you tried Picom? https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Picom
454.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
Never underestimate the community. The Github project is gone, the people are not. I'm pretty sure they will find an good alternative to github (with Issues, Pull Requests and so on) to continue the collaborative work on youtube-dl.
455.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
The comment is back up at the now.
456.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
I think that such problems requires humans to make a decision. There should be a vote mechanism / leader election / democratic process to give some people the power / admin role to solve these issues by manual intervention.
457.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
What do they use as file storage solution for their customer repositories on gitlab.com?
458.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
Isn't it possible to create many small playbooks, instead of a big one. This would allow you to just run the stuff you need. And if you need all e.g. for bootstraping then you can create one playbook that simply includes the smaller on
459.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
Yup. It's absolutely possible to determine whether you play versus a strength reduced/weak engine or a human. Humans make human plans and play according to human best practices, which you can find in chess literature. Engines, how
460.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
Exactly. At the moment there is no way to determine if a strong player used an engine for a single move or not (without proctoring). And one perfect move in a critical position can make all the difference. Also more subtle cheaters would ne
461.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
I think it's okay for now do give svelte a try, but to stick with react for serious projects.
462.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
I think we need bare-metal serverless, same like we have bare-metal clouds. For that we need something like kubernetes but for serverless environments instead of containers.
463.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
Now, I'm confused.
464.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
I wonder what would be necessary to fix DDOS altogether from a technical perspective.
465.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
I think it will be a win-win situation no matter what. If Google loose, we will see an even bigger shift to FOSS, which is obviously a win for the whole developer community. If Oracle loose well then things stay as they are, we are still mo
466.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
It's about meaninglessness. Maybe it's just me, but things (including life) that are finite are valuable and special for me. Also in terms of Lord of the Rings I would rather be a human or hobbit instead of an elf. But I respect e
467.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
I mean you can use your own brain and think about the idea of living forever and the consequences it would have. The more I think about it, the more it becomes a depressing idea at least for me.
468.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
Even if we assume we could somehow do this, I would recommend you to watch some Star Trek episodes with Q. Living forever can be even more depressing than to live one finite life.
469.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
> stop it from going nova Somehow preventing our sun to swell into a red giant is also only a short term and meaningless problem in the grand scheme of things. You would have to prevent the heat death of the universe if you want human ma
470.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
I'm excited about Python 4.0
471.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
But can it run Kodi with 4k streaming?
472.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
compiling from source, i guess
473.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
So like Docker.
474.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
Has someone measured the input latency, compared to xterm and urxvt?
475.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
I think people like you are the last one to adopt. Only when a new language is battle tested and has been around for at least two decades, with an language update rate equal or smaller than Go, only then you might want to consider it for yo
476.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
Hmm. okay I understand that you still disagree but I don't get your point. > So I think you can tactically play football and chess equivalents in 1D, but the actual movements required to execute the game still require three dimensio
477.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
I mean the difference is that I can actually play (not only observe) chess with just 1D representation of the game. Whereas football requires you to act physically in 3D space. But you are right, I would also consider "virtual football
478.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
Well you cannot play football, because this requires physical activity. But I think, yes, for games that just require 1D information exchange and thought, that's all it needs. Any 2D, 3D, 4D representation of that 1D information is jus
479.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
You can even play chess without any physical or digital 2D or 3D board. Blindfold Chess is a thing. The chess board in my mind is 3D, but this may vary from person to person. Game position and moves can be stored in 1D, just text. https:&#
480.
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
The README.md contains install instructions for Debian and Ubuntu, these tend to outdate (not work) quite fast with newer versions of the distributions. Also if any of the low-level libraries BLAS, LAPACK or ARPACK updates, then the wrapper

More ›