Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tudorizer
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
tudorizer
1y ago
The one-time price is interesting. If the platform goes away in 1 year, it essenetially becomes 39$/year. Any plans on how you'd make this a longer lasting product?
32.
▲
by
tudorizer
1y ago
The gist of the article is a fun thought experiment. Why count lines of code? Error handling is nothing to sniff at, especially in prod. Imagebin had a small handful of known users. Open it up to the world and most the error handling in Go
33.
▲
by
tudorizer
1y ago
same. Would have prefered a lo-fi stick figure drawn on a napkin. The cartoon Max detracts from the rest of article, which is a good read.
34.
▲
LLMs bring new nature of abstraction – up and sideways
(martinfowler.com)
54 points
by
tudorizer
1y ago
|
117 comments
35.
▲
by
tudorizer
1y ago
> Vibe coders are clients seeking an alternative, not developers. Agreed. That's genuinely a good framing for clients.
36.
▲
by
tudorizer
1y ago
I accept any equivalents of reading comprehension tests to prove thay I watched the video, as I have many of Andrej's in the past. He's generally a good communicator, defo easy to follow.
37.
▲
by
tudorizer
1y ago
Sure, I wasn't sure how to call the robot layer. Is is "Iron Main Suit"?
38.
▲
by
tudorizer
1y ago
Entertain me in an exercise: First, instruct a friend/colleague of how to multiply two 2 digit numbers in plain English. Secondly (ideally with a different friend, to not contaminate tests), explain the same but using only maths formul
39.
▲
by
tudorizer
1y ago
TIL. Thanks for sharing
40.
▲
by
tudorizer
1y ago
Agreed. This e-commerce example is quite a good highlight for LLMs. Same can't be applied when your supplier needs 300 68 x 34 mm gaskets by the BS10 standard, to give a random, more precise example.
41.
▲
by
tudorizer
1y ago
> That's a lot of people to talk to in a day more or less, since the talk happened. Were they all there and you too, or you all had a watch party or something? hehe, I wish. The topics in the talk are not new. They have been explore
42.
▲
by
tudorizer
1y ago
Fair. No process is 100% efficient and the depths of many topics become ambiguous to the point where margins of error need to be introduced. Chip fabs are defo far into said depths. Must we apply this at more shallow levels too?
43.
▲
by
tudorizer
1y ago
Can we have it now and skip 3.0?
44.
▲
by
tudorizer
1y ago
Might sound like a generic tangent, but it's the conclusion people will leave from the talk.
45.
▲
by
tudorizer
1y ago
> Did you talk with them? Otherwise this is just creating an imaginary argument against some people you just assume they didn't listen. I have, unfortunately. Start-up founders, managers, investors who taunt the need for engineers b
46.
▲
by
tudorizer
1y ago
Working code or not is irelevant. Heck, even human-in-loop (Tony-in-the-Iron-Man) is not actively the point. If we're going into "it's all about" territory then it's all about: - training data - approximation of the
47.
▲
by
tudorizer
1y ago
I watched the entire talk, quite carefully. He explicitly states how excited he was about his tweet mentioning English. The disclaimer you mention was indeed mentioned, although it's "in one ear, out the other" with most of h
48.
▲
by
tudorizer
1y ago
95% terrible expression of the landscape, 5% neatly dumbed down analogies. English is a terrible language for deterministic outcomes in complex/complicated systems. Vibe coders won't understand this until they are 2 years into bui
49.
▲
Recognitive Design – the framework for the post LLM age
(transition9.ai)
1 points
by
tudorizer
1y ago
|
0 comments
50.
▲
by
tudorizer
2y ago
amazing! I just installed it and enjoying the integration.
51.
▲
by
tudorizer
2y ago
'tis a broad umbrella, but my co-founder and I are deep into transforming excess green energy (wasted because of curtailment) into ML / AI compute. Focusing on training and fine-tuning, because of lower bandwith requirements. We&#
52.
▲
by
tudorizer
2y ago
so where is this actually hosted? couldn't find on the home page
53.
▲
by
tudorizer
2y ago
On a quick glance, it seems it's possible to run this as a service similar to JupyterLab, right? I'd be keen to offer it as an alternative to Jupyter on my little GPU platform experiment.
54.
▲
Walkthrough the steps and requirements to train an AI / ML model
(paragraph.xyz)
6 points
by
tudorizer
2y ago
|
1 comments
55.
▲
by
tudorizer
2y ago
I wrote this article as a preamble to a collection of tools and resources titled [ML Development Cycle]( https://tudormunteanu.github.io/ml-development-cycle/ ). It's meant to be open and public. So far I received q
56.
▲
Decentralization – a deep cause of causes you care about deeply
(hi-project.org)
2 points
by
tudorizer
2y ago
|
0 comments
57.
▲
by
tudorizer
2y ago
amazing! How do you gauge "GPT-4o-level assistance"? Have you tried side-by-side comparisons?
58.
▲
by
tudorizer
2y ago
why would it be satire?
59.
▲
by
tudorizer
2y ago
Indirectly: choose boring tech because it's well documented, widely supported, and training data for LLMs abound. Do you run LLMs locally? I'd be keen to have an overview of your stack.
60.
▲
Lined notebooks (ruled paper) vs. blank pages
(paragraph.xyz)
1 points
by
tudorizer
2y ago
|
0 comments
More ›