Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tucnak
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
37 ms
·
691.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
Why now? The innuendo has grown to be unbearable?
692.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
The "HSM support" bit is totally dependant on compliance; it's not about APIs.
693.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
People are also willing to die for all kinds of stupid reasons, and it's not indicative of _anything_ let alone a clever comment on the online forum. Show some decorum, please!
694.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
Touche
695.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
Is it possible to avoid rust completely when programming using Steel?
696.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
>Or executives believe it is beneficial for themselves. It doesn't matter, the end-result is the same, and it's completely up to you to either recognise it, or be delusional about it. We all make that choice, it's just the
697.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
Gerrit?
698.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
Believing in people isn't religious discourse like believing in God is, or more generally "believing in the coming of superhuman entity," and I think there's no denying that AI safety circles are somewhat similar in stru
699.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
How is employees protecting themselves is suddenly a bad thing? There's no idiots at OpenAI.
700.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
Your optimism is fascinating & inspiring. Perhaps one day it would mature enough for GNU Taler and the like.
701.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
I'm not prepared to assess people's personal business, and I believe it's inappropriate for us to discuss their relationship as none of us are privy to their personal history, who paid for what, who approached who or approach
702.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
Would you feel better had he locked her up in premier upclass mental institution?
703.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
D’Angelo is certainly naive in his self-interest, and definitely not capable as to orchestrate this thing. Think of him like he's useful bastard, and now it's his turn to become the scape-goat bastard for everybody to hate. This i
704.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
I believe that her military rank or equivalent thereof is inconsequential; for one, I would agree that it's nothing terribly impressive. What is telling, however, is the surrounding discourse, how the AI safety circles assess these peo
705.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
Not that I'm aware, please share if there's useful input! Have you read the thread that I linked to? This particular communication had me convinced, look up OP.
706.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
Great analysis, thank you. I don't think I had seen anyone connect the dots between Helen+Tasha dynamic duo and Adam specifically; Dustin Moskovitz is quite a common denominator.
707.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
What do you mean fun to speculate? I think there's no doubt that Toner is not for real and Georgetown Center for Security and Emerging Technology smells fine, too, I mean their mission is quite literally "Providing decision-makers
708.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
Thank you, of course!
709.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
The most surprising aspect of it all is complete lack of perceptible criticism towards US authorities! We were shown this exciting play as old as world itself— a genius scientist being politically exploited using some good old pride and env
710.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
To be fair, lots of people called this pretty early on, it's just that very few people were paying attention, and instead chose to accommodate the spin, immediately went into "following the money", a.k.a. blaming Microsoft, e
711.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
State-side counterintelligence must stop meddling in AI startups in such blatant ways, it's simply too inefficient, and at times when we most need transparency in the industry...
712.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
Based on Bloomberg reporting, she aimed to rehire Sam Altman and Greg Brockman.
713.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
They did try that first but Mira had already betrayed them within 24 hours lol.
714.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
> PPS: Before I took the job, I checked on the reasoning behind the change. The board did not remove Sam over any specific disagreement on safety, their reasoning was completely different from that. I'm not crazy enough to take th
715.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
> He is not exactly an insider, but seems broadly aligned/sympathetic/well-connected with the Ilya/researchers faction, his tweet/perspective was a useful proxy into what that split may have felt like internally. Grea
716.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
I think it's pretty safe to assume by now that US state-side counterintelligence has full control over AI safety circles, and given that everything is a nail when you're a hammer, the spooks probably consider these people domestic
717.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
how can people be so naïve... think about it. isn't it exactly the kind of spin that you would expect from "new" leadership? like, of course they're going to take the moral high-ground like any new regime would.
718.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
Reads like lesswrong fan-fiction
719.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
Ayy lmao
720.
▲
by
tucnak
3y ago
No, I don't think you understand. "That way Mullvad can only see the IPs I visit" is your point and it _doesn't_ stand. There isn't really multiple ways of looking at it; the point you were making is exactly the poi
More ›