tucnak

28 ms·

481.
by tucnak 2y ago
Yeah, Cloud is a bit of a scam innit? Oxide is looking more and more attractive every day as the industry corrects itself from overspending on capabilities they would never need.
482.
by tucnak 2y ago
Why do they downvote you are these people neurotic or what? You're exactly right!
483.
by tucnak 2y ago
> People don't accidentally type sudo in front of commands And you're basing this assumption off...?
484.
by tucnak 2y ago
> YC > OSS Nice try
485.
by tucnak 2y ago
Yeah, no. If you're going to be doing `rm / ` you might as well do `sudo rm / ` just as easily. It's the same security model, and honestly the distinction is quite funny.
486.
by tucnak 2y ago
sudo is equivalent to root
487.
by tucnak 2y ago
I think you missed the joke here
488.
by tucnak 2y ago
Haha, I'm going to steal that!
489.
by tucnak 2y ago
You really think making videos with computers is not useful? Is this a joke?
490.
by tucnak 2y ago
Zizek's analysis on the object-desire substitutions in films (including Eyes Wide Shut, but also notably other classics) is more eloquent. This blog post reads like bad, talentless undergrad attempt at theory; nothing new is said, pred
491.
by tucnak 2y ago
Dank
492.
by tucnak 2y ago
Nobody wants your money
493.
by tucnak 2y ago
UUID was a mistake :-)
494.
by tucnak 2y ago
How is (A) relevant? It's not like Google is pouring lots of money into Go! The use of Go _inside_ Google is limited at best. I would say, the success of Go is exactly aligned with the success of cloud plumbing as a whole: Docker, Hash
495.
by tucnak 2y ago
Backing up to local RAID is nice, unless you're using local RAID as your primary storage in the first place, like we do. I'd looked into using a combination of AWS S3 Glacier and FUSE (s3fs?) for rigging snapshots to S3 via btrbk
496.
by tucnak 2y ago
People don't like hearing this, but Hetzner support is horrible. In the two years we'd had an account with them having used numerous auctioned boxes, we had to reach out to support a handful of times, and every single time they&#x
497.
by tucnak 2y ago
Thanks for Porkbun suggestion, I'll keep that in mind; it doesn't support .at but I'm now tempted to move my other domains there. Gandi used to be good, it's a shame what it's become.
498.
by tucnak 2y ago
Wow, I never knew that to be the case! How would I find a registrar that supports .at LTD? Cloudflare, AWS, Google—neither supports it.
499.
by tucnak 2y ago
Gandi?
500.
by tucnak 2y ago
I'm not bothered to `switch` errors, however I really wish I could also match against both static errors (ErrSomethings) and error _types_ in a single `switch`, because now whenever I want to properly handle most errors, I need at leas
501.
by tucnak 2y ago
Terror
502.
by tucnak 2y ago
> maybe older than you, even Okay so what? I appreciate good code, not old code. I needed to patch _some_ web browser a few years back, and had attempted Firefox first for kicks. It was a very painful experience, a few weeks no gain. The
503.
by tucnak 2y ago
I have no interest in developing "native" applications and engaging with the two-party app stores. So yes, I really wish Safari had implemented Push API, so that iOS users are able to use the same capabilities that my other users
504.
by tucnak 2y ago
Until recently, Firefox was quite slow but with the Quantum release they addressed it somewhat. From a user perspective, I say, if you like it, trust Mozilla, don't care about what they have become, you're fine. In my opinion, it&
505.
by tucnak 2y ago
See the last table. By what extent of imagination it is "up to date"? Not to mention that many "Partials" in the second table are really more on the "No" side, like Push API. But yeah, it's not even the ma
506.
by tucnak 2y ago
It's many things; overall low-quality compared to Chromium. Thankfully they have deprecated XUL a few years back which was really holding people back in major ways, but yeah, it's not good. People don't like to hear that, but
507.
by tucnak 2y ago
I'd never suggested Firefox is akin to IE. Safari is, however, as it's tied to macOS. You cannot use it on Linux, and nobody really uses it on Windows. You cannot use it on Android. It's hopelessly behind on many modern Web s
508.
by tucnak 2y ago
Safari is great if your idea of a browser is from 2010's. Safari is not really on top of modern Web standards which is a shame because it really does have clean UI, albeit not too many options for power-users. No extension ecosystem, e
509.
by tucnak 2y ago
Why would you use Firefox—that would be supporting Mozilla, or Safari—as they correctly pointed out in the comments—the IE of 2020's? Have you actually seen Firefox source code? It's horrible; not one bit surprising that Chromium
510.
by tucnak 2y ago
Honestly, I wouldn't put it behind IBM to turn it around with POWER revival. They'd been doing some cool stuff recently with their NorthPole accelerator[1], and using 12nm process while at it, indicating there's much room for

More ›