tubby12345

12 ms·

61.
by tubby12345 5y ago
>yes, but (a) that is now As far as I can tell the complaint is being made now, not 10 years ago. But maybe I'm wrong and actually I've woken up in the past - please let me know if that's the case.
62.
by tubby12345 5y ago
https://www.google.com/search?q=Alonzo+Church+Logic+of+Sense... Took me exactly two searches - one to figure out what lsd stood for (which I'm sure you knew, so you wouldn't have the same issue) and then one more
63.
by tubby12345 5y ago
You're wrong and and so was he and you definitely shouldn't weigh in since I'm sure you're not nearly as qualified as he was (neither wrt physics nor virology): https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_t
64.
by tubby12345 5y ago
Why do people incessantly complain about this? It's by far the lowest brow complaint I've ever seen about anything - "some hypothetical person might not be able to Google". Note they're never complaining on their ow
65.
by tubby12345 5y ago
you're saying seemingly contradictory things (that would best be resolved for me if i just dug into clash, so i will): >HLS generally means you compile a very high level description of computation to VHDL/Verilog. ... >Clash
66.
by tubby12345 5y ago
got it - it's like chisel. thanks
67.
by tubby12345 5y ago
>Clash is not HLS i don't understand - how do you generate the bitstream if you're not generating verilog or vhdl first?
68.
by tubby12345 5y ago
qq: i know that for HLS sometimes (most?) the generated HDL is 10x the number of resources (flip-flops?) compared to hand-written HDL. how bad is clash in this respect?
69.
by tubby12345 5y ago
>I don't know what is tapeout The person you're responding to isn't an FPGA dev (or at least not primarily). They're talking about verilog for ASIC design where the last step is is making the lithography mask that &q
70.
by tubby12345 5y ago
Coincidentally enough I'm neck deep in this area for the last month (I haven't read this paper but I've read others from the group). There are a bunch of things around this that are related and look vaguely the same: abstract
71.
by tubby12345 5y ago
no it means vaguely what the person you've responded to is alluding to - window controls and such that mimic the controls that the user's OS uses. incidentally I agree with the person you've responded to - what's the poi
72.
by tubby12345 5y ago
quite true - i drank about a liter an hour throughout the trip and urinated pretty infrequently lol
73.
by tubby12345 5y ago
I feel like this is greatly exaggerated. I did half of that in 3 days (500km) with the last day being 250km (because I was sick of doing it) and I didn't feel any such "caloric furnace". I ate a couple of pbjs each day and th
74.
by tubby12345 5y ago
can you give an example instance? I'll test on both.
75.
by tubby12345 5y ago
I work on compilers and I have lines in papers like "runtime performance is important for many heavily used services [1,2,3,4]". The reason you do this is to preempt some annoying reviewer whose area is some other dimension of the
76.
by tubby12345 5y ago
you're very far down for someone that has absolutely the most precise reason...
77.
by tubby12345 5y ago
Maybe some people are tired of sycophantic hero worship (in science and elsewhere). >We are trying to look at the worst of someone that did so much for the world. Have you ever considered that maybe hagiography is a disservice to these p
78.
by tubby12345 5y ago
no you are willfully misinterpreting this question posed by a layman >what's the smallest useful (as in, 'non-toy', or maybe 'worth buying time on') quantum computer? this question is not about papers or research
79.
by tubby12345 5y ago
lololol you keep dancing around the issue - now we're on to comparing "excited" to "useful"; the question wasn't what you're excited to work with (i'm excited to work with 5 qubits through qiskit). th
80.
by tubby12345 5y ago
>But "naïve programming" (the art of writing a dumb algorithm with no regards to performance or optimizations) can bite you hard amen. people should learn to write fast code instead of "spraying and praying" https:&#
81.
by tubby12345 5y ago
>And your refusal to distinguish physical and logical qubits is just silly and leading to your confusion. ...bruh i'm a phd student whose work supports SQMS at fermilab (not in physics but cs). i'm not confused about absolutely
82.
by tubby12345 5y ago
>There is no such thing as "full stop period" qubits, hence the confusion. of course there is - this is just more of exactly the same word play lol >In 1995, Ben Schumacher provided an analogue to Shannon’s noiseless coding
83.
by tubby12345 5y ago
This your lede answer to what is the smallest useful non toy QC: >If you are a quantum computation person developing near term applications, you probably would already start getting excited with a 100 (sufficiently long-lived) qubits. Th
84.
by tubby12345 5y ago
>a million "physical" qubits is a fairly reasonable guestimate. ... >If you are a quantum computation person developing near term applications, you probably would already start getting excited with a 100 (sufficiently long-l
85.
by tubby12345 5y ago
Infinitesimals can't be used to prove anything - it's really easy to write equations like x + y + z = 0 dx/dy * dy/dz * dz/dx = -1 that make no sense if you don't know epsilon-delta calculus. You can use infini
86.
by tubby12345 5y ago
Probably over 50% of hn is this kind of shilling. Why don't dang and company do anything about it? Because "if you're getting something for free then you're the product".
87.
by tubby12345 5y ago
Not sure what this means - pytorch's autodiff is reverse mode accumulation. You can read pazschke's paper on it or just go look at the implementation.
88.
by tubby12345 5y ago
The name of this bubble is salty delusion/denial - hn is exactly where you would find people that have tried to get hired at FB and have failed.
89.
by tubby12345 5y ago
>The early adopters have problems > LibreOffice Initial release: 25 January 2011; 10 years ago don't think it's getting solved mated
90.
by tubby12345 5y ago
>I rather listen to the hedge fund guys, at least they have skin in the game, don't they Haven't you ever heard of "talking your book"?

More ›