ttt0

16 ms·

151.
by ttt0 5y ago
He meant terminating with '/>' like '<meta/>', not '<meta></meta>'. I was coincidentally checking the same thing yesterday, and yes, '/>' is optional.
152.
by ttt0 5y ago
> Hunter's laptop were so obviously hacked It wasn't hacked, that crackhead left his laptop in a repair shop and just forgot about it. > Joe Biden doesn't take bribes? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_x
153.
by ttt0 5y ago
Greta Thunberg tweeted by accident some kind of internal memo with their talking points, so there is that. The reality is that all these powerful people know each other, go to parties with one another, are a part of same organizations like
154.
by ttt0 5y ago
Damn, that's a wild thing to say in response to a censorship of a true story. I mean seriously, why even bother having democracy and free speech at this point. How does that make you any different from a dictator that's censoring
155.
by ttt0 5y ago
Twitter doesn't have a homepage. It's just log in / sign up.
156.
by ttt0 5y ago
As far as I'm considered, the purpose of std::optional is so you don't have to allocate memory on the heap and then check for null pointer. I don't want it to throw exceptions, just like I don't want the language to chec
157.
by ttt0 5y ago
The centralized network stops itself from implementing it. That's what it used to be like on for example Twitter, where people used blacklists. But Twitter didn't want that and they wanted to be the arbiter of what you should or s
158.
by ttt0 5y ago
Yes, uncensored social media will tend to accumulate people who have been censored, that's the point.
159.
by ttt0 5y ago
Why did people try so hard to censor this story?
160.
by ttt0 5y ago
According to some in the West, censorship is actually "saving democracy".
161.
by ttt0 5y ago
Is CNN enough? https://archive.md/wWaat#selection-1333.275-1347.126 > The orders also reference "biological sex," a disputed term that refers to the sex as listed on students' original birth certificates.
162.
by ttt0 5y ago
That's true, because a 100% open minded person would believe anything uncritically, without questioning it. That's why I said fairly open minded. But if you refuse to discuss it then what else can I say.
163.
by ttt0 5y ago
> no one denies that 6-fingered humans are humans to start with I see what your issue is. I haven't noticed this previously, but I think you're just attacking a straw man at this point. Rarely you can say something with 100% ce
164.
by ttt0 5y ago
I'm a fairly open minded person and I can change my mind if something makes sense to me. I assumed that maybe here I will find someone who can explain this thing to me, but so far I'm not impressed. The mean of perpetuating our sp
165.
by ttt0 5y ago
> An infertile woman is broken then? I don't know if I would necessarily use this particular word as it's mostly associated with lifeless objects, but in a sense - yes. Similarly to how having a disability or being an amputee i
166.
by ttt0 5y ago
I'm not sure how to respond other that it's interesting how people switched from accusing everyone of being ignorant to demanding from them to be ignorant. Or was it always some kind of doublespeak? Not sure.
167.
by ttt0 5y ago
> If male == can sire children and female == can bear children, then infertile people don't have a sex which is nonsense. Your conclusion is nonsense, the premise is not. A broken computer is still in essence a computer, even if it
168.
by ttt0 5y ago
Find me an intersex person that can both bear a child and impregnate a woman. From my understanding, it's still falls under either this or the other, not a literal third sex. And even if, that's a tiny fraction of what already is
169.
by ttt0 5y ago
I haven't said anything about the motivations behind it. It's probably just a feeling that you're doing something good. But that's basically what I'm talking about, the biological sex is obscured with words like &qu
170.
by ttt0 5y ago
For sure, the world is much more complicated and the inability to read between the lines and not taking everything at face value certainly isn't limited to "educated people". But there is a lot of truth to this quote nonethel
171.
by ttt0 5y ago
“Why you fool, it's the educated reader who CAN be gulled. All our difficulty comes with the others. When did you meet a workman who believes the papers? He takes it for granted that they're all propaganda and skips the leading ar
172.
by ttt0 5y ago
Snopes? ok lol https://archive.md/Wy4GT https://archive.md/wrEXO https://archive.is/AqkNf http://archive.is/HNgc9
173.
by ttt0 5y ago
A brief story of free expression on YouTube: At some point they implemented what they called a 'Limited state', which stripped almost every functionality, like comments, likes, embedding or sharing on videos that did not violate
174.
by ttt0 5y ago
Actually, I don't know, you tell me. Who were these supposed law enforcement officials that claimed, I quote, "he was struck in the head with a fire extinguisher and with a bloody gash in his head was rushed to the hospital and pl
175.
by ttt0 5y ago
> Law enforcement were the ones who initially said the officer died And does anyone know the names of those law enforcement officials? Because as far as I know they never said who it was. Greenwald is rightfully fixated on criticism of m
176.
by ttt0 5y ago
They lied that Hunter's laptop was both/either hacked and a Russian misinformation campaign. The lie about Sicknick was that he was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher.
177.
by ttt0 5y ago
lol, that's basically how it looked, funnily enough. https://www.sakafete.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/maxresde... https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000&#
178.
by ttt0 5y ago
I only watched the 1997 Berserk. I tried to watch the continuation, but I couldn't get past that awful CGI animation. Is it worth it?
179.
by ttt0 5y ago
> the autopsy found no evidence the 42-year-old officer suffered an allergic reaction to chemical irritants [...] there was no evidence of internal or external injuries.
180.
by ttt0 5y ago
It's almost as if this entire thing was way overblown by the media and there was no plan to overthrow anything.

More ›