ttt0

61 ms·

601.
by ttt0 6y ago
This is a compilation of the opposite side using way more extreme rhetoric that I managed to found within 15 seconds: https://youtu.be/hgPVkcLBjK8
602.
by ttt0 6y ago
There was no hate speech and there were no calls for violence from Trump, quite the opposite. Twitter banned him because he might say something that might be interpreted as such, but of course they didn't care what the act of bann
603.
by ttt0 6y ago
Google is an advertisement company. They are not giving the user they want, but whatever someone pays them to make the user think he wants. And that's being charitable to Google, as there were leaked internal memos from Google essentia
604.
by ttt0 6y ago
Look, all I'm gonna say is that the social media are not a free speech refuge. You still can't say anything that your government made illegal. Just as the article you posted says, Jaś Kapela was put on trial for something he sai
605.
by ttt0 6y ago
Are we playing semantics here? You called it "free speech". I wish we all had the 1st Amendment in Europe, but unfortunately we don't. Every European country claims it has free speech, but at the same time puts limits on it,
606.
by ttt0 6y ago
What is even your point? Just because you're saying something on Facebook doesn't mean that the law of the country you're in doesn't apply to you anymore. You still have to abide to your law. What this does is that it on
607.
by ttt0 6y ago
That doesn't make any sense. What is that even supposed to mean? Yes, Polish people have only the free speech that doesn't violate the Polish law. Some people might think that the laws could be more strict or more relaxed, but thi
608.
by ttt0 6y ago
If authoritarianism means that people can freely speak their mind on the internet, then let so be it.
609.
by ttt0 6y ago
Paradox of Human Rights
610.
by ttt0 6y ago
And you think that banning him didn't do that? I am supposed to believe that they were so considered that he might say something that might cause some actions, but they didn't considered at all what their action of banning him w
611.
by ttt0 6y ago
First of all, it was not "not covered", but censored. The Hunter story is valid, simply because it's valid. The same media that decided not to cover the story before the election, confirmed its validity since then and decided
612.
by ttt0 6y ago
If it was truly irrelevant, Twitter wouldn't censor it. They even locked out the New York Post out of their account for posting about it. Biden is in the politics for decades, there is more then plenty of pretty damning evidence to sho
613.
by ttt0 6y ago
Is the yin-yang metaphor an intentional pun to Andrew Yang? That's clever, I like it. I'm not sure if I buy this esoteric explanation though. Right now we're back to neoliberalism and neoconservatism, assuming the sky won&#x2
614.
by ttt0 6y ago
That's my point, the government. Banking is not a free market. So can we put this nonsense to sleep already? And since you don't seem to be too interested in the free market argument anyway, let me respond to the rest of your comm
615.
by ttt0 6y ago
> Half of this thread in a nutshell is loyalists who have a mediocre grasp on history. Yes, I particularly love when people are trying to appeal to history and justify hate speech laws and Antifa to say that without them, a second Hitler
616.
by ttt0 6y ago
> And, they are armed due to the 2nd Amendment, which Gandhi didn't have to deal with. I don't think you know who Gandhi was. If you think that tolerance doesn't work then just don't call yourself tolerant, it's
617.
by ttt0 6y ago
It's not an option, because of the banking, which is a gray area. It's privately owned, but it's not really a free market either. The problem is that Visa and Mastercard is blacklisting people, just because the angry mob comp
618.
by ttt0 6y ago
It's all the way up to the banks though, Visa and Mastercard are deplatforming people too.
619.
by ttt0 6y ago
Just wait until someone will come up with "Paradox of Human Rights" lol.
620.
by ttt0 6y ago
It's not, but in my opinion it should be. Just like in the EU for example, I believe the banks are legally required to provide you a basic bank account, regardless of what your politics are. But ultimately, it doesn't matter in th
621.
by ttt0 6y ago
You cannot base your judgement on emotions, especially in times like this. > His followers have now begun talking about returning with arms. Only fools would assume that these threats are idle talk or jokes. I don't understand why i
622.
by ttt0 6y ago
This slippery slope is real though. This is what happened to gab. They were kicked out from their domain registrar and payment processors, and Visa blacklisted the owner's family. Just saying.
623.
by ttt0 6y ago
Planned attack? No, I'm afraid I don't know anything about that. The latest video that Trump posted there was that the protestors will be prosecuted and that he basically concedes and will transition power over to Biden. At no poi
624.
by ttt0 6y ago
Okay, so the solution to calm these crazy people down is for twitter to ban Trump and then post his tweets that supposedly call for violence on their blog, so the Streisand effect will kick in and even more people will see it? I think tha
625.
by ttt0 6y ago
If Nahshon Garrett is lying then he is going to prison for perjury. The only thing that I remember from back when I was still paying attention to this is that they've worked with Russian businessmen or journalists or whatever. And that
626.
by ttt0 6y ago
No, I'm not dismissing dog-whistling as a term. What I'm saying is that this is not the case here and you're making it up as a desperate attempt to rationalize what GoFundMe have done.
627.
by ttt0 6y ago
You keep misrepresenting what I'm saying. Please stop. The claim was that evidence is not being suppressed and I've presented that the research of the subject is being deplatformed. In your attempt to undermine this simple fact yo
628.
by ttt0 6y ago
Here is what I am basing the poll observers not being able to challenge the ballots claim on. From the day one, a lot of people from all over the place have been alleging the following thing. They weren't able to come any closer than
629.
by ttt0 6y ago
> No, that appears to be a voter registration record. Is there something on it you think indicates he voted? My Ballot Status 10/20/2020 Your ballot was signature verified and counted. I'll try to respond
630.
by ttt0 6y ago
That's just my opinion, but here is what I think: I already believe that at least 90-95% of those claims are BS, and no one had to convince me to believe anything. However, considering the fact how many people seriously consider Trump

More ›