ttt0

54 ms·

511.
by ttt0 6y ago
I think this is a mistake. They already issued one correction from "20-member" to "20,000-member". The author seems to have serious problems with numbers. Look at the first paragraph: > Facebook Inc took down a popula
512.
by ttt0 6y ago
Exactly. All you have to do is gather the money to fund it. It's really not that hard, you just have to build your own bank and stock market first.
513.
by ttt0 6y ago
That's what they've been doing for quite a while, but no one cared.
514.
by ttt0 6y ago
Agreed, the wallstreetbets guys are bullying innocent rich people and they have to be stopped.
515.
by ttt0 6y ago
No one is stopping you from building your own island. Stop whining.
516.
by ttt0 6y ago
The thing that gets me is that they don't ban specific people, it's always the entire community that gets taken down. But totally nothing to see here, guys.
517.
by ttt0 6y ago
Facebook and Wall Street
518.
by ttt0 6y ago
Just build your own UN, buddy.
519.
by ttt0 6y ago
The most recent was the Parler takedown.
520.
Facebook shuts popular stock trading group amid GameStop frenzy(reuters.com)
909 points by ttt0 6y ago|498 comments
521.
by ttt0 6y ago
We unfortunately don't have enough power to destroy all frameworks, so you might be saying this to the wrong people. Say that to those who abuse them instead.
522.
by ttt0 6y ago
But it's a free market and Google can do whatever they want lol. Don't you dare to say a bad word about them.
523.
by ttt0 6y ago
> I think it’s more likely emergent behavior born of individual executives making decisions that benefit their image and career, rather than some conspiracy. https://archive.fo/1khJw#selection-1877.0-1877.86
524.
by ttt0 6y ago
A secret police knocks on your doors?
525.
by ttt0 6y ago
"Valid", as in, "it works".
526.
by ttt0 6y ago
Slippery slope is a valid political tactic for those outside the Overton window.
527.
by ttt0 6y ago
Yes, I noticed it and already edited my comment, my bad. The person below is a blue checkmark.
528.
by ttt0 6y ago
Blue checkmarks seem to confirm this: https://twitter.com/dreamwisp/status/1354865709998723072 edit: My bad, it's "just" cancelling their orders, not selling anything on their behalf.
529.
by ttt0 6y ago
As a user, I'd like to make sure that a trading app won't deny me the opportunity to actually make decent money.
530.
by ttt0 6y ago
I get that people are pissed, but this is exactly the same thing that the Qanon idiots were doing - going along with the wildest theories and calling anyone who questioned them complicit. By doing so, they destroyed their entire movement an
531.
by ttt0 6y ago
I don't know if that's a positive, but companies like Google often cave to the mob and the press demanding deplatforming of certain individuals. If they remove the ratings then that will just prove, once again, what their allegian
532.
by ttt0 6y ago
> It doesn't have as rich a history being used as a slur "Queer" does. And people use it today.
533.
by ttt0 6y ago
I support that kind of speech. Not the teacher example, but if it happens in some voluntary gathering, I really can't see why not. Like I said, people sometimes get emotional and you can't expect from everyone to stay calm no matt
534.
by ttt0 6y ago
> So the opposition of discord is a gang of wallstreet traders? It was just in general, but even in this case, yes, there are two sides opposed to each other. One happens to be more influential, powerful and with more money behind it, an
535.
by ttt0 6y ago
> Couldn’t we have stayed more civil in the first place? Who is "we"? It was just some Discord server. No one forces you to be a part of it. And they're not even political. It's stock market, so obviously people will
536.
by ttt0 6y ago
Slowly, but surely, more and more words are being chipped away from the definition of free speech. Putting the free speech thing aside, the problem here is that it can and it is being used as a pretext to silence the dissidents and the op
537.
by ttt0 6y ago
I'm right, because what I'm saying is reasonable. Recreational drugs are not necessary for you to survive and thus you shouldn't risk using them if there is a possibility of them ruining your life. It's common sense. edi
538.
by ttt0 6y ago
It's not faith, it's called experience. Every single one of my friends that regularly smoked weed, regardless of social or economic status, ended up using harder drugs. Despite the fact that we had a very strong culture of looking
539.
by ttt0 6y ago
> So this study basically shows that cannabis users are more likely to experiment with other drugs I didn't even need a study to know that. Why people are so in denial about cannabis?
540.
by ttt0 6y ago
Because anyone who actually does damage to the system and the elites is a far right fascist.

More ›