ttt0

47 ms·

421.
by ttt0 6y ago
If I remember correctly, it wasn't just YouTube. Because of that people lost their entire Google accounts, including e-mail, drive and whatever else people trust Google with nowadays That in particular made me go from just not using Go
422.
by ttt0 6y ago
And what do you do to force them to confirm the reason? That's right, get it to be so high up on HN.
423.
by ttt0 6y ago
I'm sorry, but what the fuck? Who asked for this?
424.
by ttt0 6y ago
There is "free" as in "free beer" and "free" as in "free speech".
425.
by ttt0 6y ago
Another cool one is "Event 201".
426.
by ttt0 6y ago
Tools like this are trivial to make and it's trivial to do it manually using Google. I don't see any point in getting angry about the existence of tools like that, as it's beyond anyone's power to stop people from doxxin
427.
by ttt0 6y ago
Lol, exactly. This is a doxxing tool, who do you think is going to use that?
428.
by ttt0 6y ago
Since when is CSS a programming language?
429.
by ttt0 6y ago
They don't. If I understand it correctly, destroying the object triggers the QEvent::Destroy event, which then goes through the event handler on the parent object that might access that pointer. On libc++ that pointer is set to null be
430.
by ttt0 6y ago
"No man, no problem", as they used to say in Soviet Russia.
431.
by ttt0 6y ago
Are they? Some people I saw seem to be more considered about animals than humans.
432.
by ttt0 6y ago
With the extreme environments that some animal species live in, I'm not even considered about destroying the life on Earth. It doesn't seem like an easy thing to pull off.
433.
by ttt0 6y ago
> ...I would promote race-blindness as the solution to this. Don't you know that colorblindness is white supremacy? So good luck with arguing that. https://twitter.com/CoralineAda/status/1267529522041282563
434.
by ttt0 6y ago
I hate ads so much, that the only influence they have on me is that I will be less likely to make a purchase.
435.
by ttt0 6y ago
> Likewise I don't care that Google knows what I searched for, or that Twitter knows what I tweeted, or that LinkedIn has my employment history. What I don't want is all of that being sold to Cambridge Analytica to then aggrega
436.
by ttt0 6y ago
> Failing to see how this benefits Australians They will hopefully stop using Facebook.
437.
by ttt0 6y ago
Would there be any difference at this point?
438.
by ttt0 6y ago
> there is no evidence that the alphabet-boys hijacked the term "Conspiracy theorist" and used the media to change people's perception that conspiracy theorists is batshit crazy people with tinfoil hats. I don't know
439.
by ttt0 6y ago
As you're just trolling at this point, this will be the last thing I'm going to say. Your example is not "perfect", it's stupid. No, NFL doesn't count as a tech industry and it's not in scope of what I wan
440.
by ttt0 6y ago
> Do you expect them to treat people they'd prefer to shut down better than garbage if they weren't allowed to shut them down? Yes, because they would at least have to come up with a valid reason for refusing you a service. You
441.
by ttt0 6y ago
> If you want to be served by good companies who genuinely value you as a customer because they view doing business with you as beneficial, that's the easiest way to get there. We are already here. Generally speaking this is most
442.
by ttt0 6y ago
I'm "dodging" the NFL example, because again, I do not care about NFL. At all. They can be forced to keep Colin or not, pick whatever answer you want. It's has nothing to do with it. And nothing has shifted, I'm sti
443.
by ttt0 6y ago
> Vendors have every right to not want to host people they don't support. Not always. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pruneyard_Shopping_Center_v._R... > If you really cared about free speech, you would demand
444.
by ttt0 6y ago
Boycotting a company for doing something its legally obligated to do doesn't make any sense. Regarding lawsuits, section 230 is a thing.
445.
by ttt0 6y ago
> I'm talking specifically about the banks and basic services like I listed. I'm not trying to be mean, but what part of this statement should I clarify for you to understand? Should barbershops be subjected to the regulations
446.
by ttt0 6y ago
> The First Amendment does not prohibit the private sector from restricting speech. If it did I wouldn't be here arguing that it should. And let's stop pretending like we are so considered about the private sector and private c
447.
by ttt0 6y ago
Why does FCC even exists then? It clearly violates the freedoms of private companies. What about their freedoms?
448.
by ttt0 6y ago
Facebook and Twitter is just a tip of the iceberg. Even if you tried to do something different, other companies you have to rely on will either force you to follow what Facebook and Twitter does or shut you down. I'm talking about serv
449.
by ttt0 6y ago
Specifically with the things I listed - yes, I do. In regards to banking it's not even a free market in the first place.
450.
by ttt0 6y ago
Yes, it is. I don't think that you should be cancelled for being a communist, a nazi, a black nationalist or whatever, simply for holding such opinions. Really outrageous thing to say, I know.

More ›