ttpphd

23 ms·

1. 241.▲
   by ttpphd 4y ago

   Thank you. As a total commander user, I was hoping someone would do this comparison and share it. Appreciated!
2. 242.▲
   by ttpphd 4y ago

   Take the temperature of your colleagues. Are they also feeling like that?
3. 243.▲
   by ttpphd 4y ago

   >You can’t preemptively fire someone for something they haven’t done nor even attempted/planned to do. You can fire someone for no reason at all in much of the US. It's employment-at-will.
4. 244.▲
   by ttpphd 4y ago

   Obstinacy does not guarantee success. My advice is a variation of "pick your battles". It's ok to have battles, just don't make them a big enough part of your life that it becomes your personality, and don't engage
5. 245.▲
   by ttpphd 4y ago

   I think you would really enjoy the game Codex. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/131111/codex-card-time-s...
6. 246.▲
   by ttpphd 4y ago

   This is far from the main discussion, but I used to be a "stinker" like the author describes, and I have a touch of unsolicited advice. Life is much happier if you save your obstinate streak for very limited, important occasions.
7. 247.▲
   by ttpphd 4y ago

   Feeling resigned to just not understanding this one as a lay person. Oh well, hope it leads to more cool things!
8. 248.▲
   by ttpphd 4y ago

   That is a moral panic whipped up by pro-gun crusaders who want to blame everything but the easy availability of guns for America's domestic terrorist problem
9. 249.▲
   by ttpphd 4y ago

   ...an IPA? Are these beer goggles?
10. 250.▲
    by ttpphd 4y ago

    This exists. Welcome to Scite. https://scite.ai/
11. 251.▲
    by ttpphd 4y ago

    If you find "I changed my mind" to be the message, then you agree with me that it is rhetoric. It is testimony of conversion.
12. 252.▲
    by ttpphd 4y ago

    I'm very clearly and obviously doing the exact opposite
13. 253.▲
    by ttpphd 4y ago

    The comment this is a reply to is what's known as rhetoric. The goal of rhetoric is to persuade the audience in the absence of logic or evidence. The comment is offering "testimony of conversion" which is not scientific.
14. 254.▲
    by ttpphd 4y ago

    Sorry but the post above is unscientific sophistry. Science is about weighing competing theories by examining the relative strength of evidence. The evidence is strongly in favor of zoonotic origin. What's posted here is an exercise in
15. 255.▲
    by ttpphd 4y ago

    $1 in 1981 is equivalent in purchasing power to about $3.22 today: https://www.in2013dollars.com/us/inflation/1981?amount=1 2 incomes * 6 dollars/hr * 3.22 = 38.64 dollars/hr household 65,000 * 3.22 = 20
16. 256.▲
    by ttpphd 4y ago

    Unavailability is the cologne of desire.
17. 257.▲
    by ttpphd 4y ago

    Oh cool! I did this in unity for a game jam. I called it Lexicode. I used conceptnet numberbatch. https://greatfilter.itch.io/lexicode I am learning c# as I learn unity, so it's very rough. But I am proud of the hint s