ttctciyf

13 ms·

151.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
Thanks!
152.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
Also xlander ( apparently maintained! https://github.com/ac000/xlander )
153.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
It's such a quick and handy tool that I became habituated to xv over a decade of use. Some years ago though, I found it was no longer available to install after an upgrade. I was eventually able to fudge a working version from old code
154.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
ISTR from my scout days that "ducking" is a fabric surround at the bottom of tent walls that you tuck under the groundsheet - probably from the same root, I guess - though few online dictionaries seem to have heard of it.
155.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
Isn't the claimed "truth" based on an appeal to a more intuitive notion of truth than a formal model-relative one? The Godel sentence for some Formal Axiomatic System asserts, by way of numerical encoding, its own unprovabili
156.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
The article didn't mention it, as far as I could see, but the source is available[1] at the author's site with an interesting and fairly permissive license. 1: https://80.style/#/hsp/noctis_widgets_and_ac
157.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
Essentially, a (fake) Windows instance.
158.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
Me too, though I guess it has something to do with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror_symmetry_(string_theory...
159.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
> starring Salma Hayek as Joan Charlie Brooker has come a long way since tvgohome[1]! > Hayek said that it gave her opportunity to [...] have "permission" to do "the most disgusting, grotesque things", though one s
160.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
> We started with "probable billions" on climate-related PR and you replied with evidence of millions, Again you omit the salient detail that "probable billions" referred to an entire industry and the (conservative) $
161.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
Liberal use of the little [-] minus sign on the right when the current discussion branch veers away from my interest, personally. Admittedly doing this on the instagram post leaves no content except a link telling me that an additional 520
162.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
> will be economically useless if it is banned. Economically set back, maybe. "Useless" (with its implication of permanence) is way OTT.
163.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
From the paper[1] referenced by TFA: > In brief, our proposal is that psychedelics disrupt functioning at a level of the system (sensitivity of deep-layer pyramidal neurons, power of low-frequency rhythms, and integrity of large-scale ne
164.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
Maybe some sites allow search engines to bypass paywalls so the full content gets indexed, and the plugin appears to be a whitelisted search engine to these sites?
165.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
Your "facts" are not, as you appear to believe, counter evidence but merely misleading and goalpost-shifting distractions from the claim that inordinate sums have been spent by the fossil fuel industry supporting organizations who
166.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
I find the desmog website more credible than a random HN account, thanks.
167.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
This took about 30 seconds to find: "ExxonMobil‘s $33 million campaign to sow doubt and denial about global warming" > [...] We know this $33M figure is an underestimate of the total spending by Exxon to fund opposition work on
168.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
> an emotionally and politically charged topic that can be hard to discuss with any clarity. Not to mention the probable billions of dollars spent in an effort to increase public ignorance[1] around the issue. (See [2], for example.) 1:
169.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
So, short answer, "yes a legal category is what's being asked for". Got it.
170.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
> Twitter is firing off about 10 requests a second to itself to try and fetch content that never arrives because Elon's latest genius innovation is to block people from being able to read Twitter without logging in. It seems an outl
171.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
From the article: > this new landscape demands more than just new laws. It also requires a new category for psychedelics. Are they recreational drugs? Are they medicines? Are they religious sacraments? I'm asking why we can't j
172.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
Haha, thanks for the reply, just seen this. Nicely summarized! I guess I'd come under Humanities as far as my interest in consciousness goes, but I'm more "We don't know what Consciousness is, but let's at least sto
173.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
I'm curious why you're dissatisfied with the organically arrived at "folk taxonomic" category: psychedelics . Are you looking for a new classification in law?
174.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
Chomsky's publishers: > All other reproduction, whether by printing or electronically or by any other means, is expressly forbidden without the prior permission of the publishers. This file may only be used as part of the CD on whic
175.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
> For the susceptible, instant communication with an entity representing a god, even God himself, could be transformative. I wonder if the author is aware of AI Jesus on twitch?[1] AI representing a popular deity, open 24/7. 1: htt
176.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
Her actions seem exactly consonant with what she was quoted as saying in the article I linked. She seems more interested in the existence of rogue human Special Access Programs than that of space aliens. Why do you think her actions imply a
177.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
Well, ok, but she isn't coming out of the UFO closet in quite the same way; where Rubio directly bolsters, Gillibrand has "no idea" of the veracity of Grusch's claims[1] and seems to be more focused on getting oversight
178.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
I noticed Josh Hawley shoring up the Grusch allegations recently[1], and now Rubio (TFA links his name to Why Are Florida Republicans Paying a White Supremacist Goon? The saga of Marco Rubio and the Proud Boys [2], BTW) Is UFO credence sta
179.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
Once they reach $100bn, confiscate all their wealth and make them start again with a market stall and a small loan (say $1M). Call it Billionaire New Game Plus.
180.
by ttctciyf 3y ago
> Have you ever wondered why so many companies incorporate Delaware? > [...] decreased liability and litigation. > [...] incomparable tax savings. There is no state income tax for Delaware corporations that conduct business out of

More ›