tscs37

68 ms·

721.
by tscs37 10y ago
I think you're completely failing to understand my point. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3482389/how-many-primiti... You only need about 9 primitives and can build the rest from there. You can implement
722.
by tscs37 10y ago
>Reader Not quite sure what you mean there. If you are talking about the Lexer, it's also rather simple since LISP doesn't need lookahead. Everything is in prefix notation. >Garbage Collector Which can be incredibly simple s
723.
by tscs37 10y ago
You're right, I always confuse the many forms of LISP to some certain degree...
724.
by tscs37 10y ago
>This is not "stopped using". This is "using less frequently". Not OC, but I deleted my Facebook account about 6 or 7 years ago and I'm still quite happy with it. My university course communicates 99% over WhatsA
725.
by tscs37 10y ago
I can probably answer the LISP question; the Core LISP Languages is incredibly simple. It has only 8 or so keywords you really need and 5 syntax forms (probably wrong, I don'T have the exact numbers in my head) It comes with very few
726.
by tscs37 10y ago
The autoresponder is more of a "This domain accept OAuth" and sends back the email body. That way, the autoresponder doesn't need to know anything about the process nor does it authenticate the user. It merely sends back a ma
727.
by tscs37 10y ago
Manipulating DNS is sadly very easy, but a TXT record of this type should be better than a MX record, as long as a oauth signin also contains a normal login link. In this case, the worst-case is an attacker injecting a TXT record to force O
728.
by tscs37 10y ago
A possible solution would be a DNS TXT entry (some with custom mail domains will have some sort of access to their DNS), which Portier could look up and use to determine if the service supports some form of OAuth. Alternatively, if DNS is n
729.
by tscs37 10y ago
>Should there not be a software solution that lets you select which network/s the phone should connect to? If I recall correctly german ISPs are trying to find a solution there by embedding the SIM into the device and then branding
730.
by tscs37 10y ago
>The argument is that the formalism of Big-O notation itself is generally irrelevant (except where it isn't, obviously). That sentence kinda defeats the argument itself. If it's irrelevant except where it is not, then your argu
731.
by tscs37 10y ago
>Europeans also convinced a starving Zambia to reject the generous US gift of life saving grain. As a European I am ashamed by what anti-GMO groups are saying every day.
732.
by tscs37 10y ago
>An O(1) algorithm sounds great, until you realize that 1 means 1 hour for that particular algorithm, while a competing algorithm's O(n) might mean n seconds in reality. Well, I'm not trying to miss the bigger picture, but if y
733.
by tscs37 10y ago
>O(n²) and O(n log n) What about O(n!) and O(logn)? I think that will probably explode even at microscopic input sizes. Even in the real world, understanding what O is helps a lot. That doesn't mean you should use it everywhere or t
734.
by tscs37 10y ago
>And anyone pointing to a specific version will still see that rather than the new one. That's an IPFS Hash tho, not IPNS. Differences matter. >I think that's a bit strong. Over time your IPNS could very well become your ide
735.
by tscs37 10y ago
Interesting... I guess I'll use more hashes.
736.
by tscs37 10y ago
:) Yup.
737.
by tscs37 10y ago
Well, for one I don't care much, I run my hobby stuff on there, not my mission critical services, so cheap is good, even with some really minor drawbacks. Secondly, I could not find a source if Scaleway uses ECC or not...
738.
by tscs37 10y ago
Scaleway is probably my new favorite VPS provider atm. It's console is way simpler than AWS. The only things that bother me are the limited availability of ARM nodes and being unable to ~~experiment~~ use SIS. But even with that it&#x2
739.
by tscs37 10y ago
A screenshot doesn't live on IPFS forever. IPFS has garbage collection, if content is not requested from any peers, the peers will drop the content after some time. So your screenshot will probably live a couple hours or days but not f
740.
by tscs37 10y ago
Probably not but it should make them more robust. On Ethereum you can model complex PKI which IPFS nodes can utilize to validate IPNS data. IPNS data should be signed by external keys you can revoke and manage. Or ideally even encrypted.
741.
by tscs37 10y ago
>I'd likely still be hosting the files right? Yes but the entire web points to the wrong files since you no longer own the IPNS location. It's similar to loosing access to your DNS configuration or loosing your GPG keys to an a
742.
by tscs37 10y ago
>The old content remains visible and online if the private key is leaked, afaik. The problem is that content that is not access becomes garbage collected and that links and listings will most likely not point towards the hash itself and
743.
by tscs37 10y ago
Most "slowness" is related to content that is either relatively fresh on the network or or rare content. If my node is the only one seeding the file, accessing it via gateway.ipfs.io is slow but it's pretty obvious why; I&#x2
744.
by tscs37 10y ago
Well, technically that's already possible by putting some form of index under the IPNS name. There is no real standard tho.
745.
by tscs37 10y ago
That is true but most external or IPFS-external sites will probably want to point at the IPNS link, bookmarks are gonna point at the IPNS link, etc. In the same way you could still use the old IP + header manipulation if someone took over a
746.
by tscs37 10y ago
Well, as I understood IPNS is a bit limited; it only has one resource and there is only one authority that can change content, the node in this case. It does protect against DDOS, since old content remains visible and online but if the priv
747.
by tscs37 10y ago
IPFS is a pretty nice project, but it's pretty slow at times.
748.
by tscs37 10y ago
Well, it's certainly not something that needs to be avoided at all costs but in the long term it can be less efficient and more costly. It depends really, there is no single true language (except LISP) to solve all problems in the enti
749.
by tscs37 10y ago
I mostly agree, types are nice but they should not clutter code like in C++ or C. If the compiler can safely infer a type, it should do it, that's a no-brainer, modern compilers are very capable of doing just that. This is why I like l
750.
by tscs37 10y ago
it's not a 100% detection. You can certainly pile up deadlocked go routines, but the way most libraries (including the standard library) are setup, if you were to write some server, you'd only deadlock on the request but the app k

More ›