trumpeta

14 ms·

31.
by trumpeta 6y ago
I mean, I get the same feeling from Apple events, everything is constantly the best ever.
32.
by trumpeta 6y ago
There are plenty of cases where you can write a complex program in Rust without ever needing those things.
33.
by trumpeta 6y ago
On the first glance it looks very similar to the Duplo trains, why would one choose this over duplo?
34.
by trumpeta 6y ago
This is already the case, sqlx has to now add specific support for Redshift, its not enough ti use the postgres driver as is
35.
by trumpeta 6y ago
Redshift for instance is still using Postgres 8 wire protocol
36.
by trumpeta 6y ago
they'll end up preying on the people in 3rd world countries that don't have strong privacy legislation. Same way as Phillip Morris did with cigarettes...
37.
by trumpeta 6y ago
not OP, but the "generative art" part is what I missed
38.
by trumpeta 6y ago
I agree with almost all of the article. It brings up great points. The one thing I don't fully agree with is (2) Buy almost always beats build. I think generally it does apply and especially for unrelated, common pieces like feature fl
39.
by trumpeta 6y ago
Its column-staggered, not ortholinear.
40.
by trumpeta 6y ago
Graphs are usually persisted as a list of nodes and a list of vertices. The ML approaches usually use tuples or triplets of nodes to represent connectivity and model neighborhood. I wonder if that can not be used to model a graph in a linea
41.
by trumpeta 6y ago
There are many reasons why I respect him, but the fact that he laid out a time plan for Scala 3 already 2 years ago and then kept the timeline is mind-boggling.
42.
by trumpeta 6y ago
IIRC one of Odersky's stated goal for Scala 3 was to address exactly this issue. That being said, it is developed in a research setting so I guess even if they restrict these features now, there will be new ones added over time...
43.
by trumpeta 6y ago
I’d argue it doesn’t make sense to fix c++. A language is not about what you can do with it, its about what it doesn't let you do. C++ will continue letting you do everything in the name of backward compatibility.
44.
by trumpeta 6y ago
Wouldn't you say that the next logical step is to go up an abstraction then? Assembly -> C -> OOP/FP -> ??? In that case, wouldn't it make more sense if that abstraction was build on top of something which you can ma
45.
by trumpeta 6y ago
I think the benefit of FP is long term. Refactoring and maintenance of systems somebody else, not with the company anymore, wrote. 2 months into a project you could be forgiven for thinking oop and fp are equivalent. You haven’t yet gone th
46.
by trumpeta 6y ago
Personally,I strongly prefer light libraries over comprehensive frameworks. Yes, you have to build up your app, but at least you understand what you're doing. And when something goes wrong you know how to fix it. You can follow the cod
47.
by trumpeta 6y ago
I don't think there is a conspiracy to suppress the information, but on the other hand I'd say EU has a long way to go in terms of PR and informing citizens. Somehow all these things always surface at 11:55
48.
by trumpeta 6y ago
I found her sympathetic based on her statements about protection of democratic values in Poland and standing up for oppressed minorities in Asia. I haven't yet seen her bad side I guess.
49.
by trumpeta 6y ago
I only have the problem with AirPod Pros. The fit test never passes in my right ear and they feel very uncomfortable after about 15 minutes. They also fall out when I speak and walk with them on. But the worst is that sometimes my own voice
50.
by trumpeta 6y ago
> I'm also quite surprised they don't use thompson sampling Half of the article talks about how they use Thompson Sampling
51.
by trumpeta 6y ago
That's not actually bad, right? The whole point was to find out if it works. Now they can fix it before there is an actual emergency
52.
by trumpeta 6y ago
Last time I checked it was not possible to actually use godoc to render the doc, it just started an internal server. That made it super hard to publish docs internally.
53.
by trumpeta 6y ago
1. Use ADTs instead of OOP, always. a.k.a composition over inheritance 2. No ORMs 3. No Frameworks, use libraries to build up your project 4. Use strong type systems for modelling (make invalid states not representable)
54.
by trumpeta 6y ago
Thank you, this was very illuminating!
55.
by trumpeta 6y ago
Personally I prefer being on the other end of the expression problem - where extending underlying data (mainly sum types) is the costly operation. Like in Rust, because it actually makes you think about the data model instead of the impleme
56.
by trumpeta 6y ago
Then why does he need the leather jacket?
57.
by trumpeta 6y ago
Here's how you can solve expression problem using object algebras: https://www.cs.utexas.edu/~wcook/Drafts/2012/ecoop2012.pdf
58.
by trumpeta 6y ago
I’d say when you run a big suite in CI and it takes an hour and your first assertion of many in a test fails, you don’t know if the others also fail or not. You fix it only to wait another hour for the tests to fail again.
59.
by trumpeta 6y ago
It seems to me that this is only a problem when you try to write wasm directly. If you compile from rust then this analysis is already done for you on a higher level. or what am i missing?
60.
by trumpeta 6y ago
I think Apple is in the “real estate”/rent business here. if you compare that to how big malls operate it’s pretty similar. They take a fixed fee plus a cut from the revenue in exchange for foot traffic.

More ›