trumpdong

5 ms·

31.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
You don't need 4GB and it wastes memory to make pointers twice as big? Even Linux supports running 64-bit code in a 32-bit address space ("x32 ABI") for this reason.
32.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
JS in the web context is what C or assembly is in the native context: something you have to use, because it's the foundation the platform is built on, and every language needs a way to interact with it, and good languages support it in
33.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
There's no way to draw on a canvas in WASM either. You just decided to write JS wrapper functions for that. But you didn't write wrapper functions for DOM manipulation.
34.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
It's why people say "Donald Trump was held civilly liable for sexual assault in the E Jean Carroll case" instead of "Donald Trump raped E Jean Carroll"
35.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
Why should Google do anything unless not doing anything costs them money? Record the behavior, then contact a lawyer.
36.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
The danger there is that the government will demand access to a journalists sources. "Leak reports Area 51 has aliens!" "Oh yeah? Prove who told you that or we'll arrest you for lying" Or selectively. "Vaccines
37.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
I guess there is a small benefit to living in a police state!
38.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
That's not copyrightable because it's trivial.
39.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
Props for finding a problem that needed to be solved instead of just generating some hype
40.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
Making something similar is copying for the purpose of copyright law. If I trace over a Disney character it's still copyright Disney.
41.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
Fun fact: in India, it is a crime to connect the IP network to the telephone network in any way whatsoever that allows calls originating in IP to terminate at telephones. This is because IP network users don't have to provide ID. (It d
42.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
Don't those clerks go to jail?
43.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
Isn't this the exact same thing? If you don't have a valid ID to vote, now you don't have a valid ID to use a cellphone either. And if you wanted to go and get one, too bad because you probably need a cellphone to do that.
44.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
So basically people from Africa won't be allowed to use their phones in the USA by order of the government? (If they can even get into the country without ending up in an ICE camp, of course)
45.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
It's not about controlling them, it's about controlling you and me
46.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
Did you ever read about how the creator of Session was forced to flee Australia and move to Switzerland?
47.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
It's hardly un-American if America does it the most, is it?
48.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
There are phone farms that exclusively use burner phones and do not need to spoof caller ID.
49.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
The loophole is to use a homeless person's ID for $20. Wait. In the US don't they not even have an ID standard? The homeless person probably doesn't have any valid ID and neither do members of several other disenfranchised gr
50.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
An SMS activation price is about $0.13 btw, there are several sites that do this commercially with hundreds of thousands of numbers. Not going to name any since that'd be advertising for them.
51.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
Can you tell me more about how to order and receive a fake ID on the dark net in less than 30 seconds? It does sound rather implausible.
52.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
This is already a thing in most countries btw
53.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
It's not a consequence of this. And that's their... third... fourth? completely separate system for connecting an AWS virtual network to a physical DC in the outside world?
54.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
On the internet each ISP is looking for congested links and expanding those links, like a lazy-loaded fat tree.
55.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
That's a different thing entirely, that assumes you already have a physical layer that allows any client to connect to any broker, this is about building that physical layer
56.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
functional parts not being copyrightable means that you can't claim a program is a copyright violation based on the fact it does the exact same thing based on compatibility reasons (you can copy what the program does). E.g. git stores
57.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
why wouldn't it? If you run git through a compiler it's still copyright the git devs, same if you run it through an LLM.
58.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
Asking an LLM "here's a thing, rewrite it in Rust" is pretty clearly creating either a derivative work or a different form of the same work, just like asking a transpiler would.
59.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
They were already quite meaningless since nearly every FOSS copyright owner doesn't sue violators.
60.
by trumpdong 4mo ago
How will you get Mozilla and Google to trust it? Especially since sanctions are transitive. Mozilla and Google, being US companies, are actually not allowed to trust any entity whose purpose is to work around sanctions. Their members could

More ›