troupo

6 ms·

61.
by troupo 1mo ago
> The goal of generative UI should be to make software more personal while preserving the workflows people already know. These are inherently contradictory statements. When people actually did research instead of vibe-coding, they learne
62.
by troupo 1mo ago
For those wondering, TL is Torrentleech
63.
by troupo 1mo ago
> I think it's much easier to pay 12 bucks for a month of seedbox that includes an invite to TL Yes, it's probably easier. My quick search revealed no such seedboxes.
64.
by troupo 1mo ago
> Can google justify why are they doing this? Look at Google's earnings reports and see what constitutes 80-90% of their revenues and profits
65.
by troupo 1mo ago
It's convenient that "zombie processes" only retain data for Google-owned sites https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49583517
66.
by troupo 1mo ago
It's amazing how it held up over 20-ish years. You'd think it would only get worse after removing mandatory registration 10 or so years ago. And yet...
67.
by troupo 1mo ago
Sadly, curated public ones are also harder and harder to find (for obvious reasons) :(
68.
by troupo 1mo ago
So. Easy to get into is: "some unspecified mid-tier trackers may or may not give out accounts to some unspecified seedbox providers". It's probably easier to lurk in r/trackerinvites (or whatever it's called) hoping
69.
by troupo 1mo ago
Buying a seedbox doesn't get you into a private tracker. It's a download client.
70.
by troupo 1mo ago
> The best way is always private trackers. They're easy to get into If they were easy to get into, they wouldn't be good
71.
by troupo 1mo ago
Nope. Simpler externalities. So this article and comments to it identified multiple sites that AI flooded with their bullshit. GitHub has been strained beyond breaking with slop AI PRs. Multiple open-source developers get burnt out by the d
72.
by troupo 1mo ago
Externalities of AI will only get worse before they get even worse.
73.
by troupo 1mo ago
I have a gradfathered account from before Google Workspaces or whatever its name (Google Apps for Domains?) became a paid service, and it's in an extremely weird state after so many changes to what Google offers, integrates, fixes and
74.
by troupo 1mo ago
> this is an attempt to reduce token usage? Wouldn't generating a Python script to edit files waste more tokens than using the built-in tool?
75.
by troupo 1mo ago
> on ensuring that the open-source ecosystem There are no open source models. Only open weights . No one is giving you the source (training data). And yeah, no one is giving you the compute to train the models.
76.
by troupo 1mo ago
> The quoted sentence seems to be from some "model internals". I get these kinds of responses all the time. > I'm talking about the value of making the output in STE style, which doesn't seem useful. It is extremel
77.
by troupo 1mo ago
It's strange that there are no videos on the site of their robots doing what they claim they are doing (or they are not playing on mobile safari?) And existin videos elsewhere don't inspire confidence: https://www.reddi
78.
by troupo 1mo ago
> But the post is about Muse Spark 1.3. What do you think about that? That: - like all models it was trained on stolen data - additionally it was trained on Facebook users who were all opted in to AI training with a convoluted 10+ step p
79.
by troupo 1mo ago
But probably not when those clothes come out if the dryer, or (in the retail) when someone just throws a shirt on a shelf
80.
by troupo 1mo ago
> When we see humanoid robots actually out in the wild for sale at retail, they are going to come very very quickly, at scale. Building factories and other robots is trivial . Just go and watch videos of any modern factory. What's
81.
by troupo 1mo ago
I still have no idea how to use that abomination of a page. Any obvious clicks lead to some weird states and places that are completely unobvious. I need to get to the list of topics in a forum, or to comments on a post damnit
82.
by troupo 1mo ago
And then both Opus and Fable will happily ignore these random markdown files (happens to me all the time)
83.
by troupo 1mo ago
It helps to feed ot back saying "no human can understand this, rewrite in STE", byt it gets exhausting
84.
by troupo 1mo ago
Fable 5 is the same
85.
by troupo 1mo ago
STE is a much more natural language than whatever Anthropic's models produce: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49528326
86.
by troupo 1mo ago
You can prompt it, and it almost immediately forgets. Or context compaxtion purges ut. Or it somewhat communicates with you in it, but writes all comments and docs in its original bloated style. Training supersedes random markdown files and
87.
by troupo 1mo ago
> I think Fable 5.1 is a big improvement in writing style You think or is it better? Or you just YOLOed the model out? > and responds to my style instructions more reliably. Yeah, yeah. Previous models wete also advertised as "be
88.
by troupo 1mo ago
Isn't this just short-lived neumorphic design from a few years back? https://neumorphism.io/#e0e0e0
89.
by troupo 1mo ago
> Everything you see is rendered as textured triangles. There is no DOM, HTML, JS or CSS. Just Rust. So that's why text selection doesn't work.
90.
by troupo 1mo ago
> but forgot to leave it out of public release. They didn't forget. They never knew it was there. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49502099

More ›