troupo

54 ms·

691.
by troupo 8mo ago
> Here, check the history of sanctions of the EU to Russia. It goes back to 2014.m Oh no. The totally ordinary year of 2014 when nothing happened, and sanctions on Russia suddenly appeared for no reason at all. Prior to that there was
692.
by troupo 8mo ago
> NATO, NATO would not be moved eastward. 1. Which Gorbachev himself said never happened 2. Before 2014 almost no one in Ukraine wanted to join NATO. After 2014 almost everyone wanted to join NATO. After 2022 Sweden and Finland ran to NA
693.
by troupo 8mo ago
> Thats China. In Europe, this building speed isnt going to happen anytime soon. It wasn't going to happen in China either. China also disn't have the knowledge. And yet...
694.
by troupo 8mo ago
Okay. Now you've ranted. You have anything more substantative than rants?
695.
by troupo 8mo ago
> starting from the US arrogance that led to the war in Ukraine The US arrogance of Russia claiming Ukraine is a country that shouldn't exist and invading it?
696.
by troupo 8mo ago
> Nuclear takes like 15 years to build 6-7 years. France built 40 its nuclear reactors in a decade, at 6-7 years per reactor. Right now China is building reactors at 6-7 years per reactor. --- start quote --- Nearly every Chinese nuclear
697.
by troupo 8mo ago
> We need to fill out those paperwork... For things which just don't exist... Things like what? HIPAA?
698.
by troupo 8mo ago
Translation: all your rules and regulations are crap, and we don't want to comply with any of them. When in reality most rules and regulations are not crap, and you should care about them. Especially when your startup advertises comp
699.
by troupo 8mo ago
These are not "memories", as with every new session these are entirely new, never-before seen files that the "system" may or may not use. And it is not "learning" (which was the initial claim) as the system nev
700.
by troupo 8mo ago
Memento notebooks are not learning
701.
by troupo 8mo ago
Fade in in scroll will always be slower than the reading speed of a significant percentage of population. This becomes worse for people who just skim content, re-read the text, or want to quickly scroll to a specific place in text
702.
by troupo 8mo ago
No, no they don't. Actual learning survives beyond "sufficient context window". Start a new chat, and the "agentic" system will be as clueless as before
703.
by troupo 8mo ago
> LLMs + harnesses can actually learn. No. No, they don't
704.
by troupo 8mo ago
> hose instructions require you to use some other piece of software to write the image onto your boot disk. I mean... That is how a lot of OSes are distributed: by giving you an ISO that you burn onto a USB dongle to install. > In my
705.
by troupo 8mo ago
> Though it’s kind of unreal how complicated it is to set up HA and I literally do this for a living, both embedded sw and backend web dev. I just bought Home Assistant Green: https://www.home-assistant.io/green and a z-
706.
by troupo 8mo ago
> The fact that there is a bidirectional stateful mode for HTTP is horrifying, Oh no, really? So why didn't the new vibe-coded hotness use WebSockets for bidirectional communication? > MCP is here, it solves problems we have now,
707.
by troupo 8mo ago
> 1) MCP does more than just make an API call It literally does that. What MCP calls a "tool call" is literally an API call (well, technically an RPC call since it's just JSON-RPC underneath). But that's beside the po
708.
by troupo 8mo ago
> produces better results than just... talking to one strong model in one session? I think the author admits that it doesn't, doesn't realise it and just goes on: --- start quote --- On projects where I have no understanding of
709.
by troupo 8mo ago
> But with MCP, Claude only has to support MCP. They don't have to know anything about your lightbulbs Except the fact that it has to "know" about that specific manufacturer's bespoke API aka "tool calls" fo
710.
by troupo 8mo ago
Or... They could just use any of the existing API specs and wouldn't have to scramble to fix whatever Claude Code spat out.
711.
by troupo 8mo ago
MCP is literally "define a bespoke API using this vibe-coded protocol over JSON-RPC". There's nothing more standard or reusable or application-agnostic about it than using an API over any of the existing protocols.
712.
by troupo 8mo ago
MCP is an API endpoint. If your MCP endpoints are auditable, and the rest of your APIs are not, you're doing something wrong
713.
by troupo 8mo ago
> It tries to standardize the auth, messaging, feedback loop where API can't do alone. If it tried to do that, you wouldn't have the pain point list. It's a vibe coded protocol that keeps using one-directional protocols fo
714.
by troupo 8mo ago
> Among them, chief is security The security is so chief that they had no security at all until several versions later when they hastily bolted on OAuth. MCP is a vibe-codef protocol that rode one of the many AI hype waves where all &quo
715.
by troupo 8mo ago
Reminds me how old versions of .net used to serialize dates as "\/Date(1198908717056)\/".
716.
by troupo 8mo ago
> Isn’t this just something that any IDE has built-in these days? In most IDEs I feel that Git integration is an awkward badly integrated afterthought. They are also very much tied to the whatever IDE offers them in terms of available sh
717.
by troupo 8mo ago
> I can stage and unstage individual hunks, do complex interactive rebases, squash commits, break apart commits, etc. much faster in Magit than I can in other Git GUIs. I can do all that pretty fast in GitUp, too. Since most of the comma
718.
by troupo 8mo ago
> Gas turbines do 16% of nameplate capacity per minute without catching a sweat. 5% per minute isn't particularly extreme. If you keep jumping around with your arguments, nothing is extreme. Your original claim started with claiming
719.
by troupo 8mo ago
Oh yes. That too. It's one problem after another in quite a few countries: ignore/neglect, make processes, regulations and subsidies opaque, all of this leads to huge construction times and corruption, declare nuclear non-viable.
720.
by troupo 8mo ago
The claim was that its GUI is better than Magit's, following this claim: "Magit is absolutely the best Git GUI ever."

More ›