troupo

14 ms·

331.
by troupo 5mo ago
> So, trying to make the argument that someone's work is less-than because they used a cheaper/more amateur tool versus the tool the well-funded professionals are using No. Just the fact that they have a tool does not automatic
332.
by troupo 5mo ago
"You are not a photographer just because you have a camera" has been a standard saying since forever, and has nothing to do with elitism. Those professionals are professionals not because they own an iPhone and use it to shoot s
333.
by troupo 5mo ago
> How is it going to get access to gmail or github? Did you even read the article? Claude was opening he browser and iterating through the tabs. I presume you are logged in to your github account? Your gmail? > Whats it going to do? E
334.
by troupo 5mo ago
> I started doing it months ago and, to be honest, what the agent chooses to do isn’t unpredictable. You just wrote three paragraphs of text describing why it's unpredictable. Moreover, for the same prompt on the same machine in a d
335.
by troupo 5mo ago
> Good grief, hopefully in v28 Lemay will also throw away the absolute crap that is Liquid glass. Why would he? He was a) one of the most senior designers, b) directly responsible for its implementation and c) "driving force behind
336.
by troupo 5mo ago
> I was unaware Apple still maintained such a document? They kinda do. For a long time HIGs were well researched documents with great examples and explanations. For the past few years they've been used as post-hoc justifications (or
337.
by troupo 5mo ago
> but I could see how they might be alien and uncomfortable to someone that has only ever experienced mobile interfaces. From a review at an attempt to butcher Safari interface several years back, by Riccardo Morri https://mor
338.
by troupo 5mo ago
Ah. Now I see you point. This might actually work for a number of situations.
339.
by troupo 5mo ago
IIRC Android gave up on Flash after iOS and before Adobe's announcement
340.
by troupo 5mo ago
Ah yes. Mythical capabilities that are nerfed to the point that they are completely unusable because "cybersecurity" or "bio research" or other bullshit.
341.
by troupo 5mo ago
> The user asks for details of the last transaction, the user gets back the amount, the source, and the description in a safely quoted format What's "safely quoted format" when prompt injection is already safe in the descr
342.
by troupo 5mo ago
How does this prevent prompt injection described in the article? How does it prevent DDOSing and/or exposing the database from an injected prompt?
343.
by troupo 5mo ago
> Modern banking apps increasingly include AI-powered features. These sit between the user and a range of backend data sources, such as transaction records, product documentation, account details Literally no one stopped to even question
344.
by troupo 5mo ago
Because Apple decided you don't deserve them. It literally is: EU: users must have choice. Apple: no. Apple literally says that because they are required to give users more choice they will give users less choice: https://ww
345.
by troupo 5mo ago
> choose not to buy an iphone That's not really a choice. Hint: duopoly > Also, in this case You can't claim regulations to be onetous and bot onerous at the same time
346.
by troupo 5mo ago
Isn't that ultimately the user's choice ?
347.
by troupo 5mo ago
"Onerous requirements": users have the right to chose, users have the right to privacy.
348.
by troupo 5mo ago
> the features just can't ship in the EU while these requirements are in place, Yes, they can. Apple wields its duopoly power to try and bend governments to its will.
349.
by troupo 5mo ago
"Let's discuss how countries should bend their knee before supranational corporations"
350.
by troupo 5mo ago
> At first I thought it was the usual planned obsolescence. Then I realized it may be a true technical limitation. It's shortsightedness on Apple's part, being both the first to the game, and the last to the game. Go back any
351.
by troupo 5mo ago
> You’re hurling a separate set of UX issues onto the subject of the EU’s deferred inclusion It wasn't me who said "I can understand why Apple feels this way and wants to offer a good experience here." > Also is Siri th
352.
by troupo 5mo ago
> You can't distinguish between a machine that says "here, look at these 170 results, 10% of them are highly serious problems that you should address The machine doesn't say that. It says "Here are 170 completely corr
353.
by troupo 5mo ago
> but in this case the choice isn't between apple and the EU. It's between apple and the Funny how the word user never enters these conversations. As in user device that the user has paid for and where the user should h
354.
by troupo 5mo ago
> They were mandated to create a scheme in isolation on a deadline Self-imposed isolation and deadline. > without having input either from navigation apps or from consumers Because Apple never asked either navigation app developers or
355.
by troupo 5mo ago
What good experience? Siri has sucked for over 10 years, completely degrading in the last few, with no way to change it to a more capable assistant. Apple doesn't care about "offering a good experience". Apple cares about ven
356.
by troupo 5mo ago
Even for live shows they'd cherry pick specific scenarios that were known to work, and those would sometimes fail. IN a heavily produced pre-arranged pre-determined marketing video? It was as polished and made as smooth as possible.
357.
by troupo 5mo ago
There's nothing shallow about my take. Apple uses "privacy and security" as a cudgel to prevent anyone from breaking into the vendor lock in. To the point that EU actually had to explicitly tell Apple what to do [1], as Apple
358.
by troupo 5mo ago
Translation: Since it's the user 's device, not Apple's, EU correctly "interprets" this as the user has the right to do whatever they please, including installing third-party chat apps. Apple are just bulshitters
359.
by troupo 5mo ago
> they claim it can't be rolled out in Europe because the DMA would force them to allow selection of other AI providers They don't claim that. All they said is "later in the EU as we look into privacy and security" af
360.
by troupo 5mo ago
> Make suffers from unfamiliar and somewhat unorthodox syntax, and inconsistent language design You just answered the question "why does every language need to re invent packaging, building, etc." Because people don't want

More ›