trogdor

9 ms·

61.
by trogdor 2y ago
> After WW2 the Dutch government decided to replace the old currency with a new one. It was done to wipe out all the cash profits people had made during the war. If you couldn't explain the source of your money adequately it was POO
62.
by trogdor 2y ago
I don’t understand that at all. Would you explain what you mean?
63.
by trogdor 2y ago
That’s not saying much. Read the “Careers” section of NeuroVigil’s website: https://neurovigil.com/index.php/about-us/careers-form They are ‘recruiting’ student interns. But only after a ‘traditional three-day vet
64.
by trogdor 2y ago
> The players are following this strategy to make money, presumably more than they should want. I’m not sure I understand this. Why should there be a limit to the amount of money someone wants?
65.
by trogdor 2y ago
> just charging is PITA even for those with houses How so?
66.
by trogdor 2y ago
That makes it illegal to display pornography to minors. It doesn’t make it illegal for minors to see pornography.
67.
by trogdor 2y ago
> it's already illegal for minors to see pornography Really? What law makes it illegal for minors to see pornography?
68.
by trogdor 2y ago
>You also haven't answered what help men are receiving but choosing to refuse. I realize I'm wasting my time since you're not arguing in good faith so I'll end the discussion here. I am not the person you were talking
69.
by trogdor 2y ago
> I suspect long term fire insurance due to wildfire will not be covered by home insurance policies. As it’s not a “random” event, and instead a risk of certain areas. Insurance companies cover known risks all the time. The greater the r
70.
by trogdor 2y ago
> Treating men, and individuals generally, as a group based on statistics is just discrimination legally speaking. Imagine saying that society should fear black people because they are more dangerous because statistically speaking they&#
71.
by trogdor 2y ago
You originally wrote that extortion of funds is an ongoing pervasive issue: > In general, the racketeers will ask for a fee whether they have rights to the IP or not. They play the numbers counting on people not calling their bluff, and
72.
by trogdor 2y ago
Fair enough. I was referring to the Content ID system. >In general, the racketeers will ask for a fee whether they have rights to the IP or not. I make my living from YouTube and I have never heard of this. Can you point me to evidence o
73.
by trogdor 2y ago
The funds are held in escrow. GP is wrong.
74.
by trogdor 2y ago
That is incorrect. You can appeal a Content ID claim. Doing so forces the claimant to either retract their claim or file a DMCA takedown.
75.
by trogdor 2y ago
Wikipedia claims that they are illegal to possess, but their source for that claim is an Investopedia article that doesn’t cite any law or other source. I’m skeptical.
76.
by trogdor 2y ago
>USDA You meant USADA, right?
77.
by trogdor 2y ago
> stuck on models that worked in the past, like "both sides"ing issues sort of reflexively. That works great with a lot of things like "how much should we tax companies?", but not so much for some more fundamental que
78.
by trogdor 2y ago
Every social media company allows legal spying. Warrants and wiretap orders are issued every day in the United States.
79.
by trogdor 2y ago
> If boring-old-Youtube could promise shorts creators great exposure to an enthusiastic audience, it would win the platform regardless of its brand. Just a guess, as someone who makes their living from YouTube: YouTube creators are drive
80.
by trogdor 2y ago
Ethical non-monogamy
81.
by trogdor 2y ago
The door is not wide open to potential partners, but it’s also not closed —> door ajar.
82.
by trogdor 2y ago
Whoosh. I’m slow.
83.
by trogdor 2y ago
>It won't work as well if you insist on eating a pint of ice cream three times a day. Yeah, good luck with that. GLP-1 agonists reduce your desire for, and for many people, your ability to consume things like “a pint of ice crea
84.
by trogdor 2y ago
For seven-plus years, I was addicted to opioids and amphetamines. And then, sort of like OP, one day I just had enough of all that — and I stopped.[1] That was two-and-a-half years ago, and my life has been enormously better since. I spent
85.
by trogdor 2y ago
>the repercussions for bad actors are fines relative to revenue, 10% if I read correctly, given that the OP has stated that they work off a deficit most of the time, I can't see this being an issue. From another commenter: Platforms
86.
by trogdor 2y ago
If you are saying that just based off of the linked article, I don’t think that is clear.
87.
by trogdor 2y ago
>How do you feel about the weaker claim that footage of all police action in public spaces should be available and searchable? I have trouble with that, too. Being a crime victim should not mean that video footage of yourself in the imme
88.
by trogdor 2y ago
Strong disagree. Under many circumstances, law enforcement officers are allowed to enter places where people have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Just because the police are allowed in such locations doesn’t mean the general public sho
89.
by trogdor 2y ago
>”no zero" policies like some of the public schools where you get an automatic minimum 50% score just for writing your name on the test. When I read this, I thought there was no way it could be true. When I Googled it and looked at
90.
by trogdor 2y ago
> they provide ample tooling to creators to A/B test thumbnails They do? For many years, I made my living from YouTube. This was always a feature that people wanted, but that didn’t exist. It’s been a year-plus since I’ve actively e

More ›