Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
trimethylpurine
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
3mo ago
Sanity check for yourself. This study finds a mechanism of action for vaccine caused myocarditis, and rate of incidence. https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2025/12/myocarditis-v... My interpretation
32.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
3mo ago
EDIT: "tell us when you tested people with asymptomatic infection" Also, I'm mind bogglingly curious how you think those people would be discovered to perform a test on! So let me know why you even think that's possible!
33.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
3mo ago
Do you have the prevalence numbers or not? You're not going to convince me that LATER we got better at testing and so you're using those test estimates to plug into this older study. That's not what was discussed in this rese
34.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
3mo ago
I'd just measure total output and don't bother looking at export output. More variables and conversions in the experiment will tend to reduce the accuracy of the results.
35.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
3mo ago
If export energy is 10% of your total output, and it jumped 35% then you got a ~3.5 - 4% gain in total output, not far from the author's experience. Of course, you can math that any way you like to make the numbers bigger or smaller, d
36.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
3mo ago
> a cohort is simply a defined group of people followed over time. Yes, and the group is defined very clearly here, as is usually the case. I appreciate that you've conceded that it does not include everyone, as we see in your next
37.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
3mo ago
This seems reasonable without negating the previous comment. With no army to protect the farm, there can be no farm. A return to hunting and gathering would occur as an effect of warfare, regardless of whether or not the farmers have any ch
38.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
3mo ago
>Yeah, that's making the point for me. Yeah, I'll help you make your point when it's accurate. That's called science. Just fix the problems in your argument and I'll help you make it.
39.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
3mo ago
Respectfully, I think you've mistaken the definition of the word cohort . A cohort specifically does not include everyone. Please check the definition of cohort and then read section 2.4. They tested people treated at a small collect
40.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
3mo ago
You're not addressing the issue. 5% of what? 5% of symptomatic COVID cases. So now you have to compare that to only people with injuries from the vaccine. Otherwise you're comparing apples to oranges. If you want to compare people
41.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
3mo ago
No response. You don't want to take back the bad faith accusation at least? I could definitely and more rightfully accuse you now. Right? Good faith and all that? Honest take, you're angry that you didn't know that the FDA re
42.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
4mo ago
See section 2.4. The "unvaccinated" group includes people with a history of myocarditis and pericarditis who had an episode during the study, and coupled with the fact that cases "without an episode" were excluded, we sh
43.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
4mo ago
I wasn't aware that it was expedited, but I also wasn't able to find the documents. I did find that they were sued again to release them in Dec. 2024. https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/fda-must-dis
44.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
4mo ago
The seemingly higher incidence for placebo when compared with MMR can be explained. 1. First, the placebo data comes from an article that doesn't meet several academic standards for peer reviewed research. The researchers were the revi
45.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
4mo ago
I'd broaden the statement to say that news sources should implicitly be distrusted on the grounds that there is no method of identifying reliable from unreliable information, unlike properly peer reviewed research or even better, direc
46.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
4mo ago
I think they were complementing the absence of trash talk, not the absence of LLM.
47.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
4mo ago
Can you show me that math? Your premise is that COVID infection at just 5% is incredibly dangerous. But you can't actually say that without first knowing how many people were actually infected and asymptomatic. And you don't know
48.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
4mo ago
See my other comment answering this. It's only higher if you don't trust peer reviewed research, and instead use the numbers provided by the drug company in a study that was not peer reviewed. See the list of peer reviewers in Pfi
49.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
4mo ago
If the risk went down the term for that is "inverse correlation." In that case it would be preventative, rather than causative. Here we are seeing a correlation and we have a known mechanism of action that's driving that (des
50.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
4mo ago
I guess you never used YouTube in the early days. It was a site for posting and watching random home made videos and recorded broadcasts. Just for fun. Revenue streams for creators came after Google bought it, I think. Along with the ads. T
51.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
4mo ago
I did write "many." And for clarity sake, it's way more people than just the military. Many cities and counties had mandates, including NYC. Everyone in nearly the entire health industry across the country. Many restaurant wo
52.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
4mo ago
Because it's causally linked to myocarditis[0]. [0] https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2025/12/myocarditis-v... >Are you saying that asymptomatic people don't have myocarditis risk? No.
53.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
4mo ago
The articles are fantastic, it's the unscientific claim that the data implies safety that's at issue. You can't post research about the fact that people misinterpret research right? But it's factually true. Most of the p
54.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
4mo ago
For many, they could choose to lose their jobs and let their families go hungry, tantamount to being forced.
55.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
4mo ago
In [1] "those who are not vaccinated" is a tiny subset of society that is actually composed of those who are infected, and also symptomatic, and also not vaccinated. A large portion of society can't be counted because they ar
56.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
4mo ago
The CARES act grants immunity for the set of vaccines associated with COVID.
57.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
4mo ago
I think the point being made here is that the risk decision should be up to the recipient of the treatment.
58.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
4mo ago
>I would love to see any examples of democrats being crony capitalist of the same degree No you wouldn't. You've established a subjective measure to the discussion by which you can refuse to acknowledge any example provided. Ho
59.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
4mo ago
You sound exactly like a preacher. No math, no science. Seriously, read the thread. Look how hard it is to get people that claim to be on the side of science to do any science! Just do a little math. Yet you'll tell scientists to their
60.
▲
by
trimethylpurine
4mo ago
I've landed inarguable points with azan but I'm sure they aren't a "peer" by any definition. Claiming to have a PhD online isn't difficult. But you'll note they went silent when asked to check CDC data. Wh
More ›