Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
trezor
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
by
trezor
15y ago
That's a "solution" which may or may not be an option in 1 of the 203 countries on earth. In an ideal world we should strive for something better.
62.
▲
by
trezor
15y ago
And now reddit is down again (posting/submitting is impossible). Probably yet another Amazon issue, yet again. In all fairness I've read that the reddit devs have made lots of boneheaded mistakes in their general infrastructure-design, but
63.
▲
by
trezor
15y ago
Nice technique but it definitely illustrates the problems which Javascript's ill-defined this-keyword brings about (which was discussed here a few days ago). This same problem could easily have been solved by setting a private variable (sel
64.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
So basically no way to automate backups. In the real world, that usually translates into "doesn't really have backups".
65.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
I'm having the same issues and for that reason I've moved back to Firefox 4, since it seems to have improved quite a bit since I moved to Chrome. What seems rather ironical is that I only started having these issues with Chrome after they
66.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
I fired up my old iPhone 3G to use as a gaming-device and MP3-player not too long back. I updated to latest iOS it would support, which iirc is iOS 4.2.1. Interested in seeing how the iOS-development had been, I decided to enable all the fe
67.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
how long iOS was almost strictly superior to Android. Having had both a iPhone (3G) and an Android-phone (since 2.1) I have to ask in what ways you would argue this position, since IMO its seems strictly a matter of preference. Right now
68.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
It's all done by a bash-sc ript on an intermediate linux-shell which has access to source-control (perforce) and the server (via smb). I can post the script later if you are interested.
69.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
The title seems to imply HTTP 1.1 is already dead/abondoned, when in fact almost nobody except Google is supporting SPDY. Firefox doesn't support it, but if it's open enough there's a chance they might add support for it. MSIE support is
70.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
I'm sure MSDeploy is nice when it works. Serious emphasis on " when it works". I spent an entire evening trying to get MSDeploy to push something from my local machine to my VPS. Conditions: The VPS is remote and not a member of my home-do
71.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
Agreed. I've setup my own based on SSH, bash, Perforce and rsync. That said, Rob has a good point about MS owning the entire stack and it's pretty odd how they can't seem to put together a working deployment-process. Whatever you do: Don't
72.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
launches itself on UDP port 1434, and if the packets hit a vulnerable windows 2000 server Technically speaking, UDP Port 1434 is a SQL Server service-discovery port and it would depend on SQL Server (2000) to be installed to have any affe
73.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
Dolphin HD may not be free, but it has supported ad-blocking for a long time trough extensions.
74.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
Different (Chrome-inspired) UI I would say it is a carbon-copy of Opera, but that's just me: http://imgur.com/IzVxJ
75.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
Think of something like quicksort or a partiton function (partition 2 [1 2 3 4]) => ([1 2][3 4]). How do you have to know anything about that functions implemantation. Well. I need to know that it accepts two parameters, first being a
76.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
So if I just follow the interface specification about accepted inputs and accepted outputs I can switch in any arbitrary implementation of that function and have my code keep working. The funny thing is that this is what I would say about
77.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
1. PayPal doesn't have a corporate motto of "Don't be evil" If you think Google wont do bad stuff because of a good PR-stunt, my personal motto is also "Don't be evil" and boy do I have a bridge to sell you. You may be affiliated with Goo
78.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
If you build a house you dont need worry about the inside of bricks. Objects dont have that property, Pure Functions do. I see this exactly the other way around. Objects makes sure you don't have to worry about what's on the inside, but
79.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
It works in Chrome latest, but it is a bit laggy on what should be powerful and fairly modern laptop (Core i5, Windows Rating 5.9). I guess it's about 10 fps away from what I would consider "sufficiently" smooth, but maybe that goes more al
80.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
While this is one important aspect, I think what's interesting is not so much the GPU and what it can perform, but what it brings. The iPad2 may very well have a better, faster and more available "general purpose" GPU and I'm willing to acc
81.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
This is stupid and not worthy of Hacker news. And a stupid graph with a "FFFFUUUU"-style clutter in it wont make me go "lol!" and change my mind either. Go away. Keep this to reddit please?
82.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
Remember when there were some issues with LSE's Windows-based solution? You had Linux/FOSS fanboys all over saying that this was obviously the fault of Windows and what not and that Linux would fare much better. I'm wondering what sort of r
83.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
I remember back on my Amiga pretty much anything could be represented as a filesystem. This lead to lots of weird things being implemented (like a reboot-persistent ram-drive), but one of the things I remember distinctly is the tar-exampl
84.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
Good question. If I should answer it 100% honestly, I would say I've reached that conclusion trough very unscientific means: personal experience and a possible "postive" conformational bias. Examples of this would be me having issues with G
85.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
Actually, reading the thread on the Android subreddit one of the affected developers said he filed complaints over a week ago with no reponse nor action taken. That is until it reached the (Android sub?)reddit-frontpage. Google doesn't real
86.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
Ah right. I thought you meant there were some technical/architectural limitations with the protocol itself and didn't even think about limitations added on top of it via licensing. Thanks for clearing it up.
87.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
Hopefully it'll be much shinier than X11 and less restrictive than Remote Desktop Protocol. Out of curiosity... In what ways do you find the Remote Desktop Protocol restrictive? Does the protocol itself limit what can be done? From an end
88.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
While I don't agree with the opinion expressed or the tone it is expressed in, I do think the JC Penny story sound interesting. Personally not having heard of it before, I think this comment (accidentally?) contributes somewhat to the discu
89.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
It doesn't have to and I believe you are mistaken/oversimplifying. As far as I understood the whole Bing ordeal was that users with the Bing toolbar reported not the links and ranking shown, but what the users chose as the "correct" hit for
90.
▲
by
trezor
16y ago
If I'm reading that test right, it's Apple who cannot ship and not Firefox.
More ›