treeface

12 ms·

91.
by treeface 16y ago
But we're an inspiration company. And what greater inspiration for knowledge is there than properly-gathered statistics? All I'm saying is that you guys could do a lot of interesting things if you relied more on well-selected samples over
92.
by treeface 16y ago
I remember when colourlovers.com came out with a similar post a few months back and I said something like this: http://www.colourlovers.com/business/blog/2010/10/26/color-o... And so while this is still a nice, shiny piece of infographic
93.
by treeface 16y ago
From a personal perspective, I find it highly impressive that their dev team can get stuff pushed out that quickly. Please don't get me wrong in that respect. But what you and I think is cool and impressive matters very little in a highly c
94.
by treeface 16y ago
Sure I recognize that, and I see it as a highly valid point. But if it is in Microsoft's interests to maintain enterprise users, I don't quite see why it must be done at the expense of the non-enterprise users. Please call me out if my naïv
95.
by treeface 16y ago
In all fairness to Microsoft, the last IE9 beta was released on 2010-09-15: http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/info/downloads/Default.htm... I wonder if he has the same issues with the latest platform preview (which came out nearly two mon
96.
Stack Overflow - What problems have you solved using artificial neural networks?(stackoverflow.com)
4 points by treeface 16y ago|0 comments
97.
by treeface 16y ago
I greatly dislike how the NYT hijacks my browser's text selection. I'd much rather be able to right click the selected text and search for it on Google than have that silly word lookup hover.
98.
by treeface 16y ago
I think there's a lot of quality in your comment, but I think you're making a whole bunch of broad, generalized assumptions about the state of the entire SO community. In my experience, it's still a highly-functional community with a wide r
99.
by treeface 16y ago
Sure, but it can also create bigger problems that didn't previously exist.
100.
by treeface 16y ago
To add to what the other person wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_point#Accuracy_problem...
101.
by treeface 16y ago
Presumably the faucet hose recoils automatically? Wow that really IS futuristic.
102.
by treeface 16y ago
The mystification of what computers do is a worrying trend. Trend? When have the masses ever had a clear grasp on computation? Quoth Babbage: On two occasions I have been asked,—"Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wro
103.
by treeface 16y ago
Is there something I can do to get involved with this project?
104.
by treeface 16y ago
Nice set, though I typically find what I need on http://www.iconfinder.com/
105.
by treeface 16y ago
Maybe...or it will simply create a new branch of technical writing such that the performance is just as important as the final work.
106.
by treeface 16y ago
>I don't think someone would take the time.. Of course they would. There are an infinite number of scenarios that could lead to somebody posting an entirely fabricated review, regardless of its length or well-wordedness. However, I agre
107.
by treeface 16y ago
ould doderez = old dodders orxogrefcl = orthographical ius xrewawt = use throughout
108.
by treeface 16y ago
Cool, I suppose. However, it doesn't really seem to matter that the wifi hotspot used to be / still is a telephone booth. They could've put the router on anything and achieved the same effect.
109.
by treeface 16y ago
I code in as3, php, and js as well. What's your opinion of PHP open source frameworks like CodeIgniter, Kohana, and Symfony? Or perhaps, to take a language that I don't code in but is often lauded, RoR? Or, on the JS side, have you seen thi
110.
by treeface 16y ago
95%? Would you like to back that number up with anything? Even if I grant you that arbitrary statistic, it says nothing about the state of the selection developers have for open source projects. If 5% of all open source projects are good, t
111.
by treeface 16y ago
I, too, am sick of open source software that's poorly documented and never works. Fortunately, I use open source software that is quite well-documented and almost always works. What's your beef with jQuery? What better closed-source JavaScr
112.
by treeface 16y ago
Unless he's selling his skills for $15...which basically primes the pump itself. According to his website, he's already got more customers than he can handle for a week. Come back in a week and he'll probably have 5-10 items in that portfol
113.
by treeface 16y ago
I don't really understand people's complaints on this issue. How could you not prefer to have hundreds of images on one page instead of clicking for the next page over and over? It's the difference between a mousewheel scroll and click/scro
114.
by treeface 16y ago
Awesome! Glad to hear the feedback :-}
115.
by treeface 16y ago
I have an even better idea: animated gifs. Think about the revenue possibilities!
116.
by treeface 16y ago
I just made a giant banner that is randomly selecting a bunch of phrases. Yours is one of them. Also, you are awesome. Thanks for the idea!
117.
by treeface 16y ago
Another great idea! This is now implemented.
118.
by treeface 16y ago
Great idea! Love the critiques :-D
119.
by treeface 16y ago
Thanks jscore! We're in the process of a redesign that will greatly simplify the whole thing, but I will see what I can do in the short term to make it more obvious what we sell. Thanks again :-]
120.
by treeface 16y ago
Ilya was kind enough to review my startup, an online rave gear retail site: http://www.plurty.com Previously, I had this giant "Sign up" button on the home page, but what I had forgotten was that most of the value of the site came from th

More ›