trav4225

36 ms·

1. 361.▲
   by trav4225 11y ago

   I see your point and don't disagree. Using these semantics then, this is all user-layer stuff, and even less of an argument against "UNIX" itself. :)
2. 362.▲
   by trav4225 11y ago

   Interesting. I am a bit confused though as to how xmonad could not be considered programmable. I'm curious -- what does it lack in your opinion?
3. 363.▲
   by trav4225 11y ago

   Also, doesn't xmonad (which I happen to use) count as a "programmable GUI"?
4. 364.▲
   by trav4225 11y ago

   The value of a particular approach to OS design depends upon what it's used for. This post seems to me to be making a number of assumptions in this regard and I found myself thinking "that doesn't apply to me" about much
5. 365.▲
   by trav4225 11y ago

   Yeah, there's a fair bit of controversy on this topic. In California at least, I believe that the use of the title "engineer" is regulated by the so-called PE act: http://www.bpelsg.ca.gov/laws/pe_act.
6. 366.▲
   by trav4225 11y ago

   That's pretty much what I meant. :)
7. 367.▲
   by trav4225 11y ago

   No offense, but I just find this sad.
8. 368.▲
   by trav4225 11y ago

   hah!
9. 369.▲
   by trav4225 11y ago

   Mind if I do this to your house? :)
10. 370.▲
    by trav4225 11y ago

    Public menace.