toxicFork

14 ms·

31.
by toxicFork 3y ago
That is what rain sounds like
32.
by toxicFork 3y ago
- the machine will not take your job at every company - a human using a machine is better than only the machine - it doesn't take that much to be retrained these days, there's a lot of resources out there - maybe they will actuall
33.
by toxicFork 3y ago
May I ask: why?
34.
by toxicFork 3y ago
So which ones does it apply to in the end?
35.
by toxicFork 3y ago
Yes, it's not truly deterministic, but setting to 0 still makes it relatively less random
36.
by toxicFork 4y ago
Tbh, with plugins, that's pretty much the case
37.
by toxicFork 4y ago
I think soon yes
38.
by toxicFork 4y ago
Being banned would make it quite unwelcome
39.
by toxicFork 4y ago
Nsfw
40.
by toxicFork 4y ago
Reducing temperature doesn't automatically result in correctness, it only results in more precision. It could be inaccurate with high precision - like a bow that consistently undershoots, and you would have a harder time trying to corr
41.
by toxicFork 4y ago
I told it: In here, it says that maximum memory is 10240mb, so that may not work: Memory and computing power Memory is the principal lever available to Lambda developers for controlling the performance of a function. You can configure the
42.
by toxicFork 4y ago
It says this, is it ok? I can check when I get home ChatGPT: Below is an AWS CloudFormation YAML template for creating an AWS Lambda function with 16GB of memory: ```yaml AWSTemplateFormatVersion: '2010-09-09' Description: 'A
43.
by toxicFork 4y ago
Tbh for clash of clans, if it can set up the server infrastructure etc, then that will be quite scary. The scariest thing is that... I did use Chatgpt to set up an aws cloud formation stack for a lambda function, and it gave me the right fi
44.
by toxicFork 4y ago
Quick, someone make a project which gets ChatGPT to answer those memos
45.
by toxicFork 4y ago
That sounds like a bureaucratic issue and not a technical issue.
46.
by toxicFork 4y ago
The device can do it, but someone needs to be told to change some of the software or hardware.
47.
by toxicFork 4y ago
Then you could encounter a "computer says no" situation
48.
by toxicFork 4y ago
Technically very easy. Legally? I dunno, maybe?
49.
by toxicFork 4y ago
Someone must have trained an LLM for that for sure.
50.
by toxicFork 4y ago
The universe was a hoax invented by a GPU company
51.
by toxicFork 4y ago
Too much anime and weed
52.
by toxicFork 4y ago
It's your last name, they cannot force it off you. I'm not a lawyer, but worked for a company which tried.
53.
by toxicFork 4y ago
Regarding how long: it depends on length of messages. But let's say when there are around 2000 words total in the conversation. https://help.openai.com/en/articles/4936856-what-are-tokens-... 2 cents per 1k t
54.
by toxicFork 4y ago
How did you even manage to find these figures? Is there a Wikipedia list? Do you know which ones are most popular for your app? Disclaimer: I am also making a chat bot
55.
by toxicFork 4y ago
It's a statistical play - if on average, subscribers send less than 500 messages per month, it's profitable.
56.
by toxicFork 4y ago
To be fair, GPT is an advanced machine learning algorithm, that the product is enabling access to, for the lay person.
57.
by toxicFork 4y ago
To add: if the training and fine tuning comes from how the subject actually responded, spoke and reasoned, then that would be quite scarily accurate.
58.
by toxicFork 4y ago
The limitations of using pre trained data with a simple prompt. The bot will get inspired by the prompt a little, but most of its text comes from the training which is adjusted to sound as neutral and "generally acceptable human"l
59.
by toxicFork 4y ago
If the bot needs to retain conversation memory, it will cost around 4 cents per message once the conversation gets long enough. I guess they are also inspired by chat gpt plus prices. Source: I am building a competitor
60.
by toxicFork 4y ago
It's a very interesting and tough challenge to prevent large language models from hallucinating.

More ›