tovej

5 ms·

61.
by tovej 4mo ago
What is plan Dalet? Rejecting the establishment on your land is also not a declaration of war. Israel was the one who started the hostilities
62.
by tovej 4mo ago
Zionism and Nazism are very similar. It's true that Nazism lacks the religious aspect, and Zionism lacks the pagan aspect. I hope you can agree that these are aesthetic differences. Both movements advocate for one ethnicity having the
63.
by tovej 4mo ago
Based on what?
64.
by tovej 4mo ago
The left? The left is against Israeli violence. The far right hates Jews. Let's compare figures like, say Nick Fuentes and Hasan Piker. Fuentes regularly spouts vile anti-semitic rhetoric, painting up a picture of Jews as greedy scheme
65.
by tovej 4mo ago
That's not true, it's not a majority. It is true that Mizrahi are ~40-45% of Jews in the country, but all Mizrahim are not all indigenous to Palestine. I was referring to the subset of Mizrahi who are Palestinian.
66.
by tovej 4mo ago
You're describing a form of social housing.
67.
by tovej 4mo ago
Are Nazis pigs?
68.
by tovej 4mo ago
Where's the Hamas supporter?
69.
by tovej 4mo ago
You can stay paranoid or you can choose to face reality. Up to you.
70.
by tovej 4mo ago
The Palestinians did not start the war. Israel has started every war against the Palestinians, including the 1948 one. Israelis are not indigenous (there are rare exceptions of Mizrahis or Jerusalem Palestinians with some form of citizenshi
71.
by tovej 4mo ago
You're not a Zionist, but you then proceed to make a Zionist argument? The Palestinians were the only people living on the land before the settlers came. That included Jews and Christians, because Palestinians are not a homogeneous gro
72.
by tovej 4mo ago
What do you mean there isn't a single jew living in Gaza? How is that relevant? That is entirely beside the point. If you had the option to live as a full citizen in Israel, being told you're part of the dominant ethnicity that&#x
73.
by tovej 4mo ago
Being right makes me right. You don't even have a point? Besides a strawman argument about non-existent religious climate alarmists. There's nothing to ignore. I have no reason to give you the benefit of the doubt. You're eit
74.
by tovej 4mo ago
Ok, well, you seem to be a Zionist. And not very educated on the matter (or willfully misrepresenting things). The Palestinians are the people who lived there. The Zionists expelled half of them and razed 500 villages to the ground in 1948.
75.
by tovej 4mo ago
That is just a blatant lie? There are Jews living in all those places. Not that many perhaps, but they exist. And it's not really about religion. It's about Palestinians specifically, who are indigenous to Palestine, and are under
76.
by tovej 4mo ago
Zionist does have a specific meaning. It means you think the Jewish people have a god-given right to the Palestinian land, and that other creeds and ethnicities should be second class within the Jewish state in Palestine. A non-zionist Isra
77.
by tovej 4mo ago
They did not. They're still occupying a buffer zone, have broken the ceasefire countless times, and are blocking people from crossing. Israel razed Gaza to the ground. It was a genocide.
78.
by tovej 4mo ago
Yes, it's labeling. One of those labels is very accurate, the other is part of a rhetoric that the oil companies are using to drag out the climate response so that they can keep raking in profits. I'm not here to convince you of c
79.
Sourcehut Disrupted by LLM Crawlers(status.sr.ht)
5 points by tovej 4mo ago|0 comments
80.
by tovej 4mo ago
It was high capital gains taxes. That meant the optimum for corporations was to invest the money in R&D. The cost of paying dividends was too large, so the advantage gained from developing competitive products was actually worth it. As
81.
by tovej 4mo ago
So you're labelling me a climate alarmist before I have made a single statements about the climate crisis? I have also not used any rhetoric that wasn't first introduced by the parent, so you also have no evidence of my rhetoric.
82.
by tovej 4mo ago
You're not being very rational. Please be civil and respond to the points, rather than give a "no you".
83.
by tovej 4mo ago
It's only a religious topic to climate change denialists.
84.
by tovej 4mo ago
It's an even smaller percentage of people that are most responsible. Any multimillionaire is already someone who could have an impact, but mostly it's the 100 million club and up that are causing the most damage. And bug LLCs in g
85.
by tovej 4mo ago
The fundamental architecture of LLMs has not changed, so knowledge on that cannot be out of date. Do I internalize the inner workings of all the libraries? Not unless it's necessary. Sometimes it is. If I want to read the source code o
86.
by tovej 4mo ago
The operator is a person who irresponsibly or maliciously threatened to collect data and DOS a group of volunteers. You're allowed to block bad actors and have fun while doing it.
87.
by tovej 4mo ago
Doesn't really seem relevant, does it? Plenty of native English speakers are also using chatbots for dumb bullshit.
88.
by tovej 4mo ago
There are compiler bugs (rarely) which will be fixed. That's different from fundamental flaws in the technology, which cannot be fixed.
89.
by tovej 4mo ago
That's not what the LLM is doing. It is guessing at what is happening by regurgitating some docs. It's a more expensive web search. You also don't have a mental model if you need to ask the LLM about it. This is stuff you sho
90.
by tovej 4mo ago
I mean I don't disagree, but there's still a difference in the kind of disconnect you get. The disconnect is harmful in the high-level language case, but it's dangerous and irresponsible with vibe coding/LLMs. Also, I wo

More ›