toomim

8 ms·

31.
by toomim 10mo ago
It's like the loss of Radio Shack, all over again.
32.
by toomim 10mo ago
This paper does a good job relating OT and CRDT as the two major approaches to collaborative editing. For anyone interested in this topic, I'm publishing a new theory on this called Collapsing Time Machines: https://braid.or
33.
by toomim 10mo ago
This. Brendan Eich was the Director of Mozilla. This is the guy who invented Javascript in 10 days, at Netscape, and then co-founded Mozilla, and became the technical lead. He was Chief Architect of Mozilla, then CTO of Mozilla Corporatio
34.
by toomim 11mo ago
I've spotted a partisan perspective.
35.
by toomim 1y ago
> Is there really any new-ish binary protocol these days? HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 are binary protocols. And if you replace the JSON with CBOR, then even the payload becomes binary. The reason for using HTTP is that the semantics a
36.
by toomim 1y ago
Why are we reading this from the AP-- clearly a member of the conflict --instead of a neutral party? Does anyone have a neutral source?
37.
The Bari Weiss Strategy(letter.otherlife.co)
10 points by toomim 1y ago|28 comments
38.
by toomim 1y ago
> Your interpretation basically requires us to take everything Kirk said here as sarcastic. Yeah. When he said "Just sayin'", that was his cue for sarcasm.
39.
by toomim 1y ago
> What exactly do you think he meant here? I can't come up with any "opposite" that even remotely fits with what he said. My interpretation: God says gay people should be killed. You can't love God and deny any part o
40.
by toomim 1y ago
> If he says "God's perfect law" demands killing gay people He did not say that. Again, Christians do not follow Leviticus. I'm not a Christian, but I just looked this up: > Mainstream Christian theology holds tha
41.
by toomim 1y ago
Wouldn't you expect the conservatives, then, to be the ones who say that violence is justified? Yet you're seeing the opposite — after the killing of a conservative, it's the left that says violence is justified. Furthermore,
42.
by toomim 1y ago
Your "logical deductions" are lossy. You end up making false assumptions. In this case, your assumption is leading to rationale for political violence. No, arguing against cherry-picking does not mean you endorse everything. In th
43.
by toomim 1y ago
Nice points! But as for "causing" violence, they also asked whether "political violence is ever justified", and the difference between left vs. right there was even more — 25% vs 3%.
44.
by toomim 1y ago
Please see the primary source I just included as reference [2]. You don't need to trust the western journal. You can read the shooter's letter, in his own handwriting. In truth, he's more of a political nutcase than a polit
45.
by toomim 1y ago
Try this newer poll from last month, in 2025: https://today.yougov.com/politics/articles/52960-charlie-kir...
46.
by toomim 1y ago
That's using ancient data from... 1948: > We included individuals whose public exposure occurred between 1948 and 2018. The last 8 years of politics have been very very abnormal. And in today's data, the "very liberal&q
47.
by toomim 1y ago
You're making a debunked claim that takes his statement out of context to make it sound like the opposite of what he actually said. https://x.com/StephenKing/status/1966474125616013664 https://www.
48.
by toomim 1y ago
See also https://www.legitcontrol.com as presented at https://braid.org/meeting-118 for a beautiful example of "local NFS" as a wonderful replacement for FUSE!
49.
by toomim 1y ago
Me too. I've been wanting this with immich.
50.
by toomim 1y ago
You are still ignoring the arguments. Casualties are a sad fact of war. But it's not genocide because Israel's doing everything it can to save the civilians while combatting Hamas. If genocide was defined by the number of deaths
51.
by toomim 1y ago
The UN commissioner ignores all the obvious arguments against his case. For instance, he ignores that Israel goes out of its way to warn civilians before attacking, and provides aid to civilians. He ignores that Israel could simply kill AL
52.
by toomim 1y ago
That's not genocide. - https://archive.is/https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/22/opinio... - https://www.scholarsfortruthaboutgenocide.com/
53.
by toomim 1y ago
Genocide is about intent. The party must be acting with intent to destroy the nation or group. So yes, it's about why they fight. Here's another rebuttal: https://archive.is/https://www.nytimes.com&#
54.
by toomim 1y ago
Why is that confusing? This "Strong Eventual Considtency" is the defining property of the CRDT. Do you have a less-confusing way to think about that property?
55.
by toomim 1y ago
A replacement for X11 window forwarding which has been lost with wayland.
56.
by toomim 1y ago
Instead of linking to a one-sided reframing of the debate, here's the actual debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mvIktYig9Y It seems to be a healthy debate for both sides.
57.
by toomim 1y ago
On the contrary, I have seen tons of good choices after getting past the choice in name.
58.
by toomim 1y ago
It's fine. You really don't need to pay for the connect service.
59.
by toomim 1y ago
Wormhole streams are pretty cool.
60.
by toomim 1y ago
Ok, but those are excellent screenshots-- better than most projects' official screenshot lists!

More ›