Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tonto
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
91.
▲
by
tonto
8y ago
You do not offer any citation as to why this, the chip based genotyping, leads to misinterpretation and the article does not suggest this is the reason either. Without getting into it, the article says >An entire DNA sample is made up of
92.
▲
by
tonto
8y ago
That is because FFI is very rare not because it doesn't kill you
93.
▲
by
tonto
8y ago
Cloudfront 504 error to https://www.artic.edu/collection?is_public_domain=1 ?
94.
▲
by
tonto
8y ago
It's really not slow, I use it for everyday work in webdev and I basically have very few complaints
95.
▲
by
tonto
8y ago
"classical positivism" is a concept in the "philosophy of science" which is basically a humanities subject
96.
▲
by
tonto
8y ago
Here is one approach for that https://github.com/jkbonfield/crumble https://blog.dnanexus.com/2018-07-23-breaking-down-crumble/
97.
▲
by
tonto
8y ago
In what sense would safety be such a high priority for a high performance string library? I found this blog post was good at illustrating why undefined...similar to unsafe...operations exist https://nullprogram.com/blog
98.
▲
by
tonto
8y ago
Only one I know is w. Are to there others? Sometimes e is editor but I think that's alias
99.
▲
by
tonto
8y ago
This is the most likely scenario I think. Border agents will ask very probing questions to try and uncover contradictions in your story
100.
▲
by
tonto
8y ago
Also consider that the management or project is looking for just some vague white liquid and at the store you only see cans (powdered milk? Is that white?)
101.
▲
by
tonto
8y ago
travis-ci has a pledge to keep their open source free tier always available. I don't know how much they stand by it but theyve said it on twitter and their plans page says "Always free for open source projects"
102.
▲
by
tonto
8y ago
Your original comment is pretty toxic. What do you want to imply by your original anecdotal comment other than grandstanding? This is a research article, and you could suggest that the researchers look at more negative aspects of open sourc
103.
▲
by
tonto
8y ago
You really just don't like forensic science or what
104.
▲
by
tonto
8y ago
One place where there is no share button where there should be one is in the "swipe right" news. It's a pretty ok news reader so why no ability to share links? Maybe I missed it but when you hit the vertical "..." I
105.
▲
by
tonto
8y ago
Seems like many college os(?) classes tested making FUSE FS systems
106.
▲
by
tonto
9y ago
How about software.. Open up a program or website... You lose original purpose of being there instead mindlessly browsing
107.
▲
by
tonto
9y ago
Even if true, the CLI resurgence in recent years has really out shined advances in IDE in my view
108.
▲
by
tonto
9y ago
Fun article.. From the title it sounded like something about their business model or kaizen related stuff
109.
▲
by
tonto
9y ago
Right before release is a bad time to realize there are problems with your build
110.
▲
by
tonto
9y ago
It is interesting that open access and preprint are being conflated in some way. At least preprints public. But why is a preprint public and final not in any case?
111.
▲
by
tonto
9y ago
Great hacker news comment 10/10 would read again
112.
▲
by
tonto
9y ago
this was considered, long discussion here https://github.com/WICG/interventions/issues/18
113.
▲
by
tonto
9y ago
Wikipedia also hit pretty hard by link rot, nice thing there at least is that volunteers can try to fix it
114.
▲
by
tonto
9y ago
The hackernews re-titling of the article is pretty horrendous too. The title is "Is gender inequality in technology a good thing?" is considerably more controversial than "autism and gender imbalance in tech"
115.
▲
by
tonto
10y ago
One way I thought of doing this would be to just have every commit tagged with some subjective score given by the committer (in commit message), probably just 1,2,3 to avoid too much weird subjectivity of a x/10 ranking, that gives how
116.
▲
by
tonto
10y ago
there was a 2015 paper (same lab I think) that showed very widespread A-to-I editing in squid also https://elifesciences.org/content/4/e05198
117.
▲
by
tonto
10y ago
I don't think they want this to apply to all papers, just a certain class of papers. But maybe you have already considered that(as your reviewers obviously are already pinging you about more testing) and you still disagree?
118.
▲
by
tonto
10y ago
The point is there was an ecological collapse (Collapse by Jared Diamond catalogues this well)
119.
▲
by
tonto
10y ago
This trending topics is pure clickbait. Just like yahoo.com trending topics. Kill it https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/remove-trending-fa...
120.
▲
by
tonto
10y ago
You can add wrap to pre...Maybe for pure formatting's sake it's not a good idea though
More ›