tonfa

84 ms·

931.
by tonfa 15y ago
Plus it is the case with hg (but I guess also with git) that you can use any merge tool to merge your files. Once someone write such a tool, everyone profit! (My understanding is that it happens too rarely in practice to make it worth the e
932.
by tonfa 15y ago
Why not link to the original? blog: http://www.koomey.com/post/8323374335 article: http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2011/08/01/repor... nyt: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/01/technology/data-centers-us...
933.
by tonfa 15y ago
No it couldn't, a judge is not a program and law does not work like engineering. I highly recommend reading this essay, it answers a very similar question. http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/lawpoli/colour/2004061001.php
934.
by tonfa 15y ago
I don't think accounts are deleted, if you read the article it only talks about suspension (of the Google+ profile).
935.
by tonfa 15y ago
Google Labs is different from the gmail/maps labs. See the linked blog post and http://www.googlelabs.com/ .
936.
by tonfa 15y ago
Yeah, and people can already link to their twitter from their profile page. So this shouldn't be needed, a simple crawler should be sufficient.
937.
by tonfa 15y ago
Why only those two alternatives?
938.
by tonfa 15y ago
Interesting. It's also nice to see that Mercurial got this right from the start (it is not generation numbers, but the rev numbers can be used in the same way to stop the exploration). Some mistakes were made while designing Mercurial, this
939.
by tonfa 15y ago
FYI, it's a 3500 attendee camp. It is also almost sold out (presale currently), so if you plan to attend and don't have a ticket, now is a good time.
940.
by tonfa 15y ago
Well, in that case they might not be following the protocol. And in some cases break the connectivity for others...
941.
by tonfa 15y ago
Now that they have a profile, if they are loggued in there google account, as soon as some people in their social circle starts using it, the cost of interacting will be very low (because of the g+ toolbar).
942.
by tonfa 15y ago
If there's more than 22 persons I assume it is somehow public.
943.
by tonfa 15y ago
From what I have seen, the Plus beta is quite different in term of handling the feedback. (e.g. community managers getting involved in discussions, etc.)
944.
by tonfa 15y ago
I think you can add people (by mentioning them, which means everyone will be aware of it). To remove people from the post, the only option I've found is deleting the post.
945.
by tonfa 15y ago
Maybe you should report it to Google, in case they are not aware (via the feedback button). You could also raise the issue to a community manager: https://plus.google.com/109895887909967698705
946.
by tonfa 15y ago
Note the term: "on or through the Services". And you forgot the last part: "This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the Services and may be revoked for certain Services as defined in the Ad
947.
by tonfa 15y ago
It was kind of forced to gmail users though.
948.
by tonfa 15y ago
I wonder why it smells like the previous PR campaign... They quote terms from the ToS, which are industry standard (you obviously need to have the right to display and store the data to run the service). Also I fail to see what's wrong here
949.
by tonfa 15y ago
> The image auto-upload is a really spiffy feature, but I feel a little creeped out about it, even if it does upload everything to a private Picasa album and I need to act to make images public. It's pretty nice when people try to get y
950.
by tonfa 15y ago
Why would you do a social network with a focus on privacy and not use those settings? ;)
951.
by tonfa 15y ago
Hi, I'm a Hg dev. I'll talk to the people doing the website see what they think about that.
952.
by tonfa 15y ago
For most code (at least the interesting one), it's not 30 days, but 4 months. The monthly release is only for the stable branch. See http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/TimeBasedReleasePlan Personally i find it great (and we try to do the c
953.
by tonfa 15y ago
But it's not Google fault if they lied, right? (In case they are for example exposed to 18+ content on Google+)
954.
by tonfa 15y ago
You seem to forget that Google+ is in field trial, and was launched only 2 days ago. I don't expect any product as big as that to fully launch overnight.
955.
by tonfa 15y ago
Might have been a generic failure due to a signup rate limiting. Maybe it's worth retrying for a couple of time.
956.
by tonfa 15y ago
Yes, just retry.
957.
by tonfa 15y ago
See the help here (hopefully it works for people not in the trial): http://www.google.com/support/+/bin/static.py?page=guide.cs&... I'll quote the relevant part: > If a post was shared with a limited group of people, you can click Lim
958.
by tonfa 15y ago
Google+ works in the way you describe (when you comment you know who can view the post).
959.
by tonfa 15y ago
In Google+, the list of people with whom an item is shared is visible.
960.
by tonfa 15y ago
Try it ;)

More ›