Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tomhow
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
23 ms
·
631.
▲
by
tomhow
5mo ago
OK, how about that?
632.
▲
by
tomhow
5mo ago
Thanks! That's too long (limit is 80 chars) but I came up with something that fits. Feel free to suggest something better.
633.
▲
by
tomhow
5mo ago
We understand you feeling like it's more important to post polished writing than imperfect writing, as a non-native English speaker. But neither the HN audience nor the guidelines ( https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguide
634.
▲
by
tomhow
5mo ago
We've banned this account.
635.
▲
by
tomhow
5mo ago
Previously: Historical workstation desktop interface screenshots - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36191713 - June 2023 (55 comments) Retrotechnology – PC desktop screenshots from 1983-2005 - https://new
636.
▲
by
tomhow
5mo ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100706
637.
▲
by
tomhow
5mo ago
Thanks, we updated the link. Please submit the original source. If a post reports on something found on another site, submit the latter. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.htm
638.
▲
by
tomhow
5mo ago
If it’s bad writing it’s not a good fit for HN and should be flagged. Writing that’s obviously AI-assisted is bad writing. We’re fine with it being flagged and down-weighted off the front page. We routinely refrain from re-upping posts that
639.
▲
by
tomhow
5mo ago
Intergenerational rage like this is not OK on HN, and dehumanizing language towards anyone is clearly against the guidelines. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
640.
▲
by
tomhow
5mo ago
Please don't fulminate on HN. The guidelines make it clear we're trying for something better here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
641.
▲
by
tomhow
5mo ago
We've banned this account.
642.
▲
by
tomhow
5mo ago
We've banned this account.
643.
▲
by
tomhow
5mo ago
We've banned this account. We detached this comment from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48074043 and marked it off topic.
644.
▲
by
tomhow
5mo ago
We've banned this account. This is an utterly appalling comment.
645.
▲
by
tomhow
5mo ago
Quite the opposite. That user's comment was killed because it was classified as AI-generated. Of course it was a false positive due to the AI-generated text they quoted. These systems aren't foolproof. But we're very serious
646.
▲
by
tomhow
5mo ago
Your comment was autokilled because our software classified it as AI-generated :) It was a false positive and another user has since vouched for it. For the record: we never delete anything, aside from very rare cases in which a user asks u
647.
▲
by
tomhow
6mo ago
We've banned this account because near enough to every comment is unsubstantive fulmination.
648.
▲
by
tomhow
6mo ago
Yeah. That was a day ago and it seems to be taking longer than expected to complete recovery, hence it's still a current story.
649.
▲
by
tomhow
6mo ago
Comments moved to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48058197 .
650.
▲
by
tomhow
6mo ago
Please don't do this here.
651.
▲
by
tomhow
6mo ago
Stop this. We asked you not to fulminate on HN barely more than a week ago. Phrases like this are completely unacceptable here: How cheaply disingenuous of you Tell us you know nothing about healthcare without using "health" or
652.
▲
by
tomhow
6mo ago
Omit internet tropes. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
653.
▲
by
tomhow
6mo ago
We've banned this account.
654.
▲
by
tomhow
6mo ago
Please don't post like this on HN. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
655.
▲
by
tomhow
6mo ago
We've banned this account for repeatedly breaking the guidelines and ignoring our requests to stop. We want this to be a place where we can discuss difficult topics, but it has to be done respectfully. We obviously can't allow cal
656.
▲
by
tomhow
6mo ago
We've banned this account.
657.
▲
by
tomhow
6mo ago
We detached this comment from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48048317 and marked it off topic.
658.
▲
by
tomhow
6mo ago
It's specifically against the guidelines to keep registering new accounts, and this is a good reason why. We have to have ways of determining credibility and authenticity, now more than ever, and a track record of good posting is one o
659.
▲
by
tomhow
6mo ago
Badly-written articles are still unwelcome on HN, wether AI-assisted or not, and obvious LLM smell definitely lowers the quality of an article. But it's true, we don't ban every article with any evidence of AI-assistance.
660.
▲
by
tomhow
6mo ago
We filter out most Show HNs now (i.e., most of the ones that are submitted or attempted to be submitted by fresh accounts), and we look out for ones that have substance and authentic writing. Others have commented that the standard has been
More ›