tom_

12 ms·

241.
by tom_ 8mo ago
https://github.com/axiys : Ajay Soni axiys | AI Architect & AI Software Engineer | Building “Glass Box” Agents for FinCrime, Defence & Complex Systems | C++, Python, LLMs | Author of “You A
242.
by tom_ 8mo ago
With Windows 9x, I recall the crashes being manageable, but it was advisable to give the system 15 minutes to settle down after rebooting. Windows would start multiple things at once on startup and it was a bit risky to overstress it. Windo
243.
by tom_ 8mo ago
The point of my post was that the title is editorialized. Am I allowed to say "Did you click the link"? Probably not. But, still, let me suggest that you click the link. Once you've clicked the link, compare the title of the
244.
by tom_ 8mo ago
Well, perhaps you know what they mean! Me? I can only read the words and then guess based on the words I read. If it's not clear from my post what guesses I have made based on the words I have read, and which assumptions I have made
245.
by tom_ 8mo ago
Editorialized title! Portrait aspect ratio (or "vertical video", as it's described here - at least I assume that's what the term refers to - like, as if the landscape aspect ratio has no Y axis!) is not obviously mention
246.
by tom_ 8mo ago
I think you're right anyway. Re-reading the post with your comment in mind, I think it's clear enough that this was what was actually meant.
247.
by tom_ 8mo ago
But the link to the post was posted here just now! - which I'm assuming means something. Both share a theme: the trials and tribulations of running an open source project, I suppose. Some contributions, one way or another, demand more
248.
by tom_ 8mo ago
Presumably this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46990729
249.
by tom_ 8mo ago
The app still gets to decide though! Most programs do go full size with an alt+green click, but not all. A column-style Finder window, for example, seems to go taller but no wider.
250.
by tom_ 8mo ago
I am using Sequoia and the windows are definitely rounded! Though the radius is pretty small (the curved region is about a quarter of the mouse cursor area), so the fact you can drag it from outside the window doesn't look ridiculous.
251.
by tom_ 8mo ago
It's presumably a reference to this saying: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=2%20more%20w...
252.
by tom_ 8mo ago
This does require displays to have separate spaces though!
253.
by tom_ 8mo ago
If you got rid of the slider entirely and just had it flick between the two images instantly, the entire handle business would become irrelevant, and you'd never need to think about it again! I admit I don't do web stuff, so perha
254.
by tom_ 8mo ago
If you're referring to the <·> thing, you could well be right? I figured that was merely an indication that you could drag the thing sideways! (And I'm clearly not the only one that feels this aspect of the site would benefi
255.
by tom_ 8mo ago
Here's a tip: any time you've got before/after screen grabs, don't do this thing where you've got to drag a line to switch between the two, don't have a fade, don't have a sliding transition, or anything l
256.
by tom_ 8mo ago
After tweaking the build process to build the same dependencies from source on Linux as on macOS: x64 Linux build: 1514 x64 Linux test: 307 x64 Linux build/test: 4.93 (Again, not a perfect test, as it still won't
257.
by tom_ 8mo ago
I used this a lot when I was doing Windows stuff professionally, and I always really liked it. The command line interface is good too: supply file spec that you'd type in to the GUI, and it'll print a list of matching files to std
258.
by tom_ 8mo ago
I've often been suspicious of this too, having noticed that building one of my projects on Apple Silicon is way quicker than I'd expect relative to x64, given relative test suite run times and relative PassMark numbers. I don&#x27
259.
by tom_ 8mo ago
You should ask the word machine to try a little harder to be consistent about the language it uses: > Adele (signatur), de fleste popsangere bruger det selektivt (I'm assuming you didn't spot this bit during your proofreading b
260.
by tom_ 8mo ago
That's interesting. I assumed this was self-deprecating. I wonder which of us is right. (The web site doesn't make it very obvious, but it appears to be a UK company, and Ruiz seems to live in the UK. So not impossible!)
261.
by tom_ 8mo ago
Well I messed up my joke slightly by adding a time-dependent BTC value, which was silly of me, but I was trying to cover all bases. I should have stuck to the classic 1 BTC = 1 BTC :( (Anyway, in answer to your question: at time of writing,
262.
by tom_ 8mo ago
This article contains multiple lies. For starters, it is not the 5th of February. Also, 1 BTC = 1 BTC, or, in dollar terms, despite the claims, $64,400. I didn't pay much attention to the rest of it but I can't imagine it was any
263.
by tom_ 8mo ago
The link you provide looks like it'll be the corner shown in the photo in the article. The photo described is probably this one: https://libcom.org/article/fourth-si-conference-london - which I think is here: htt
264.
by tom_ 8mo ago
Inflexible window layout. (For example, suppose you want to see breakpoints list, call stack, and find results simultaneously. You can't, as they all share the same panel. Which is always on the left of the window.)
265.
by tom_ 8mo ago
Ahh, interesting, thanks. (I read the reference manuals but typically ignore the rest... I don't need to write this stuff, just read it!) I've seen people recommend creating docs to be LLM-friendly and I was wondering if this was
266.
by tom_ 8mo ago
No, I was referring to discussion of the semantics of flagging. Apologies; I thought it was phrased clearly enough, but, perhaps not. (Maybe I should have said "that discussion" rather than "this discussion"? This is my
267.
by tom_ 8mo ago
I was struck by the "Magnitude: High | Applicability: High" bit. Who writes like this? More importantly, who reads like this? The V4 doc (which I have yet to read, but I did a text search) has 64 occurences of this sort of phrasin
268.
by tom_ 8mo ago
But that is exactly what the flag button is there for?! - but this discussion has been had numerous times, and the two sides will never agree. Safest to flag (or not) as you see fit, because you are a good person rather than an evil one. Th
269.
by tom_ 9mo ago
But the value Y could also be put towards hiring somebody else to do an additional job, giving somebody else a pay rise, or giving money to the shareholders.
270.
by tom_ 9mo ago
Existing discussion here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46779522

More ›