to_bpr

14 ms·

61.
by to_bpr 8y ago
>rich white kid This is incredibly fatiguing. This isn't Reddit, or tumblr. Strive to be better.
62.
by to_bpr 8y ago
Oh, can we have no fun anymore?
63.
by to_bpr 8y ago
>This is an example of sacrificing the scientific method to make results more politically correct. We've come full circle. Wrongthink is nothing new, comrade ajwnwnkwos, and is as prevalent as ever. The output of science has been su
64.
by to_bpr 9y ago
We're adults here but that doesn't mean we should pursue a higher level of discourse. If you want cursing or other low content, there's always Reddit.
65.
by to_bpr 9y ago
>It's exhausting to put up with The sub in question has had polls and surveys posted to it, popular ones which have remained on the front page of it, and they've received paltry engagement (~10,000 engagements). You're mak
66.
by to_bpr 9y ago
Depends on how it's handled. If it's bastardized with US companies coming in to exploit the existing low salaries and then suppress them by co-ordinating and fighting to bring in others from other low-paid countries, then yes it&#
67.
by to_bpr 9y ago
I wonder if this is due to young people feeling like the status of previous generations (house, cars, kids, vacations, etc.) seem so much further out of reach than ever?
68.
by to_bpr 9y ago
Given the increase in fractured heterogeneity and the fall of Christianity in the USA, or at least adherence to its teaching and participation (i.e. census stats disregarded), it's not hard to see how people feel socially isolated and
69.
by to_bpr 9y ago
The perfect argument against allowing people access to their phones at performances.
70.
by to_bpr 9y ago
Looks like all the money spent on his various “campaigns” hasn’t been felt to be well spent.
71.
by to_bpr 9y ago
Indeed. Pleas to "terrorism" and "think of the children" on a topic of simply unable to access your phone for a couple of hours. HN has experienced a palpable drop in quality recently.
72.
by to_bpr 9y ago
Compulsive, addiction driven behaviour due to the gamification of apps and basic services? I say let's remove that from our experience.
73.
by to_bpr 9y ago
I agree. Male only entities are also smart and natural, and if tech based are a good use of that tech, right?
74.
by to_bpr 9y ago
>You are already welcome to create a man-only forum. Any man taking such an action in 2018 would likely lose their career over it.
75.
by to_bpr 9y ago
At what point in the last 10-20 years has the image of the nuclear family not been under attack? Beyond medicine and the fact that it's less violent than 200 years ago, it would be incredibly hard to argue we now live in healthy soci
76.
by to_bpr 9y ago
This is essentially factually untrue at this point. [wrong-link]
77.
by to_bpr 9y ago
SV has championed a super toxic, toe-the-liberal-line-question-nothing atmosphere in the workplace for years now. The damage is done. You'd have to be a total fool to bring up any of the non-left-wing, yet totally valid comments on tha
78.
by to_bpr 9y ago
The public at large have shown themselves to have little qualms about trading their privacy for convenience. Knowing this, is it really so egregious to offer decent tools/platforms to said people, to convenience said people, in return
79.
by to_bpr 9y ago
>So Canada might as well try whatever they can. This behaviour is largely the Canadian Liberal party appeasing its voter base through virtuous grand-standing over actual effectiveness. I'm very uneasy about the fact that we've
80.
by to_bpr 9y ago
>I would hate to live in a system that worked by the letter and just said "Well, can't touch him, he didn't TECHNICALLY break any laws...." Your mindset is terrifying.
81.
by to_bpr 9y ago
>falls heavily not only on the high-population coastal states but also on the younger demographic within those states Coincidentally the very people who voted for Hillary.
82.
by to_bpr 9y ago
1. You're right and I originally had "downvoted", but after returning to the main thread and only being able to see who posted and not what they posted (in this sub-thread) from there I changed it to censored. 2. With regards
83.
by to_bpr 9y ago
>What do you see as the barriers for women to participate in bitcoin? Why do you want to have a discussion involving logic when all I want to do is signal my virtues?
84.
by to_bpr 9y ago
That you're being censored for simply pointing out a very simple truth goes to show how utterly toxic our industry has become.
85.
by to_bpr 9y ago
>Why is it that the middle class who only have their single single-family house are the selfish ones? This thread is largely an assault on the middle class in SF who happen to have been around when it was affordable to buy there by a swa
86.
by to_bpr 9y ago
There has been no shortage of studies and reports on the damage social media is doing society, especially to the young. Though I'm glad to see a movement forming against it, it's sad and somewhat pathetic that the conversation is
87.
by to_bpr 9y ago
When one adds these markers of significantly decreased development or preparedness for adulthood with the increase in social isolation being reported, the levels of psychiatric issues such as ADHD and depression being observed, the relentle
88.
by to_bpr 9y ago
What is the end goal here? Companies being forced to publish and formalize pay tiers? Can Google publish a report on non-pay differences by sex at Google? Sick (or personal) leave taken, overtime worked, vacation time availed of, etc. by se
89.
by to_bpr 9y ago
>It's also possible that more men than women are willing to work longer hours https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/atus.pdf
90.
by to_bpr 9y ago
>Any chance they'll release the data that backs up this statistical claim? It was probably a pretty half baked, self-reported Google form so the data may not be worth much.

More ›