to11mtm

27 ms·

451.
by to11mtm 2y ago
Could be worse. I remember when a bunch of WSO2 contribs broke off, made their own (AGPL) ESB, and created a 'ESB Performance' website that cherry picked specific scenarios to make WSO2 look worse than their product. This was made
452.
by to11mtm 2y ago
I haven't actually used Timescale but it was on my list to try after various gripes with how InfluxDB worked and limitations on tags. Broadly speaking I can say I'd trust TSDB over Influx for a lot of cases since it's using P
453.
by to11mtm 2y ago
Agreed. Having done Akka.NET Remote/Cluster setups in prod that survived multiple 'new to the org' categories of DC Failures at their level of scale/capacity [0] there's a lot to account for if you want to keep ev
454.
by to11mtm 2y ago
Because 'exactly once' delivery is arguably a misnomer, you usually really want 'at least once delivery with acks and idempotent processing on the other side'. The difference is subtle but important in practice and spe
455.
by to11mtm 2y ago
> Depends on what you're comparing with what, and the context, of course. Agreed It's a classic question of 'what is an "embarrassingly parallel" problem' (e.x. physics calculations, image rendering, LLM ima
456.
by to11mtm 2y ago
Can you show a connection between this site and the (AFAIK separate from UK OBE/OBS) Open Broadcaster Software itself? While the page provides some insightful comments I don't see how it relates to implementation details short of
457.
by to11mtm 2y ago
> “investing in people” and “hiring the best talent” is as expensive as it is naive. All things in moderation. I've seen most of the spectrum at this point of practices. Let's look at the opposite end. Hiring 'cogs'.
458.
by to11mtm 2y ago
Huh, TIL! (I never had a PS3, AFAIR my PSP just downclocked it's CPU, I remember battery life playing classics was awesome...)
459.
by to11mtm 2y ago
Depends... But frankly one could ask whether this would be closer to 'Sampling'...
460.
by to11mtm 2y ago
'Normally' IIRC you would still be a party to the lawsuit. Might get out of it depending on specifics but you'd be a party. OTOH, I -thought?- that part of at least enterprise Copilot was that they would defend in such cases.
461.
by to11mtm 2y ago
> 1) the scale is much bigger because no human can read and generally remember all the code on GitHub while a sufficiently large model can, Semi-True but it often hits an uncanny valley of either leaving enough comments in to know it was
462.
by to11mtm 2y ago
Wealth, especially generational wealth, is a complicated problem in many aspects. The biggest 'challenge' is once you get to various echelons... of all places, I heard it best described on reddit; It's like the reverse of M
463.
by to11mtm 2y ago
I liked this enough to subscribe. Haven't looked at the code itself but there was good effort spent and great use of Grafana to illustrate the data. Will note ideally tests like this should be run 'separate' on same hardware
464.
by to11mtm 2y ago
> Don't they pack the batteries in the floor, making the car necessarily higher? Isn't this the biggest difference? Batteries in the floor make a good amount of sense if done right . 1. Just the battery for a -hybrid- (1.1kWh)
465.
by to11mtm 2y ago
> Even blocks might still be larger than 4KB, but if they’re not, presumably a NAND controller could allow such smaller writes to avoid write amplification? Look at what SandForce was doing a decade+ ago. They had hardware compression to
466.
by to11mtm 2y ago
> I realized then that the humor of those early markov generations was the ridiculousness. The point where, a few words or sentences in, you realized it was all nonsense. LLM's these days are too good for that - the text they genera
467.
by to11mtm 2y ago
> I think the lowest power ones are Atom and Celeron. All the other low wattage CPUs are RISC based. I think AMD is also coming up with something similar. AMD Had Bobcat and later Puma, IIRC there were some <5W parts in both of those
468.
by to11mtm 2y ago
> I assume it's because the actual read-write head itself must among the most expensive parts to manufacture, Ehh a modern HDD is a marvel of precision manufacturing and engineering. > rather than a bar fixed in place that spans
469.
by to11mtm 2y ago
TBH I think it would be a fun thing to do as an app to make a statement!
470.
by to11mtm 2y ago
It's true but it winds up carrying in weird ways. (my family history is awkward but suffice to say the main reason we weren't called out for being broke all the time was a factor of my mother being very involved in communities...
471.
by to11mtm 2y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Right_to_Read Locking down kernels is somewhere in the story IIRC; it's just that instead of in the name of DRM it's now for Security... But as we've seen from stuff lik
472.
by to11mtm 2y ago
I'm torn on this for two reasons however. First, I agree. Even today a lot of games have 'anti-cheat' modules that will hook into the kernel. And yes, Microsoft wants to lock down the kernel as a result. But, that is one step
473.
by to11mtm 2y ago
It was pretty fun. The -intended- purpose was Dual Athlon MPs. That said, AFAIK some early AXPs could be used, many later ones could have the bridges 'repaired' to allow dual operation. Early Morgan core (Model 7) Durons however c
474.
by to11mtm 2y ago
> I have never seen them advertise the value line so I assume they’re not that profitable compared to say a QP or a Big Mac. Per the article, this is a pretty recent thing (4 weeks or so). I've seen a couple adverts, but I'm ba
475.
by to11mtm 2y ago
When I worked at a bike shop there was a BK that would give you a survey, you could fill it out and on your next visit get a chicken sandwich or whopper with a drink purchase (I think it was a drink, anyway). Looping that one paid for a loo
476.
by to11mtm 2y ago
They like to make us use the app nowadays. It's a frustrating experience in my experience, because you either have to: - go handle your phone in the drive thru and wait to put it 'just in time' - try to put it together before
477.
by to11mtm 2y ago
according to this thing I found [0] the 486 has a predictor for the branch not taken. Not sure what that means but it looks like it's mostly for the instruction fetch/decode based on other notes. Ironically sounds close to your 5
478.
by to11mtm 2y ago
TBH though... You -should- be able to just mandate Hubs and cranks to get around this. Or make sponsors provide a 'slew' of wheels and cranksets for all their riders (i.e. spares as well) that can get inspected before the race, an
479.
by to11mtm 2y ago
Even as far back as 2005-2006 there were stories of riders taping wrenches to bikes to get to the requisite weight, it's not even a new thing per se.
480.
by to11mtm 2y ago
I was too late to the party for the BP6... I was however lucky enough to be able to get a Tyan Tiger MPX alongside a couple of 'Morgan' core Durons... Can't remember if they were 1.0 or 1.2GHZ... But wow that thing was -nice-

More ›