tnbp

6 ms·

31.
by tnbp 3y ago
For those who are tolerant of msg, it offers zero nutritional benefit. Banning it would help millions of migraine sufferers and harm no consumer. You cannot ban a natural, ubiquitous amino acid, any more than you can ban salt. You ca
32.
by tnbp 3y ago
The 4L cost $2,200 when it was introduced in 1992, which is almost $5,000 in 2023 dollars. Dot matrix printers were affordable for regular people, laser printers not so much. edit: My point is not "everyone only had dot matrix printer
33.
by tnbp 3y ago
I know this article isn't all that serious, but it's a weird one still. Today’s TV set, computer or mobile phone is light-years ahead of one you might have owned 25 years ago. Can you say the same about your printer? Well,
34.
by tnbp 3y ago
>>I know very little of its economics, like that it typically takes 7 years to pay it back and lasts 20-25 years Are you talking money or energy? Energy takes about one year, not seven.
35.
by tnbp 3y ago
Germany is a net exporter of electricity, and has been for over 20 years. Last year, France actually had to import electricity because their NPPs kept failing (too much heat, too little rain, no water to act as coolant).
36.
by tnbp 4y ago
Probably something like this: https://sunnia.medium.com/an-analysis-of-chinese-passwords-e...
37.
by tnbp 5y ago
I appreciate your inclusion of an interrobang here, which, like non-English movies, is too often overlooked.
38.
by tnbp 5y ago
MakeMKV makes it trivial.
39.
by tnbp 5y ago
I'll take it :-)
40.
by tnbp 5y ago
>1. You still haven't answered why other more authorative sites such as ChemSpider also display ball-and-stick as per the later Wiki version. (If more than one authorative site does so then there must be some reason for it - fo
41.
by tnbp 5y ago
Indeed there isn't. It isn't a discussion either--you asked a question, which I answered, while you continued to argue from ignorance.
42.
by tnbp 5y ago
>That type of problem is found throughout chemistry but usually an accepted nomenclature applies (when it doesn't is when we get into troubles). It is not. Nobody who is into chemistry is confused by it, and those who are us
43.
by tnbp 5y ago
IUPAC has nothing to do with it--aspartame is a trivial name. It's no mess, either--chemists know that 1M sulfuric acid does not contain any H2SO4, even though H2SO4 is sulfuric acid. The skeletal and ball-and-stick structures differ p
44.
by tnbp 5y ago
>I was looking at the Wikipedia article on aspartame when I realized that there was a significant error on the page. The skeletal formula was correct but the ball-and-stick model was incorrect in that it had an extra hydrogen tacked onto