tmerr

18 ms·

1. 121.▲
   by tmerr 13y ago

   I don't see what the fuss is all about. They are open to infection. They're built on linux, rather than an entirely custom system. So they're vulnerable to existing malware floating around.
2. 122.▲
   by tmerr 13y ago

   True but I don't really mind hypocrisy. Would you rather he stayed quiet about the government?
3. 123.▲
   by tmerr 13y ago

   Albert Einstein in a letter to Jacques Hadamard: The words or the language, as they are written or spoken, do not seem to play any role in my mechanism of thought. The psychical entities which seem to serve as elements in thought are certa
4. 124.▲
   by tmerr 13y ago

   Sure, hypothetically, but there is a lot that can go wrong. Scalability is an issue. In the future we will probably have to rely on thin clients making bitcoin less attractive. Governments won't peacefully accept bitcoin. Why would we
5. 125.▲
   by tmerr 13y ago

   It's about what's within it, not how they wrote it. But at the same time what's within it evolves with practice. With novels and poetry imagination is the limit. Practice pushes that forward, probably more so than with the so
6. 126.▲
   by tmerr 13y ago

   I wonder how much of this is guesswork on the part of Open Rights Group. I'm concerned about censorship but I also want to keep my facts straight.
7. 127.▲
   by tmerr 14y ago

   I enjoy it now and that's the best prediction of the future I could hope for. It would be silly to worry about something so unpredictable!