tkubacki

28 ms·

271.
by tkubacki 12y ago
It's more likely, they will push Dart as next Android lang
272.
by tkubacki 12y ago
I would consider Dartlang - "Dart is a new platform for scalable web app engineering." is the title string on Dart's home page. Dart is designed for web apps. One downside is it's still not as mature as alternatives.
273.
Shadow DOM hits Chrome 35 stable today(twitter.com)
2 points by tkubacki 12y ago|0 comments
274.
by tkubacki 12y ago
I'm using Dropwizard and it was easy enough for me - former .NET developer to get things done quickly. That said if I was starting today long term project I would go with Dartlang (yes they'are server side as well)
275.
by tkubacki 13y ago
Nowadays if I needed scripting lang I would probably go with Dartlang: better license, not a clone, probably better perf, simple concurrent prog model and still syntax is familiar.
276.
by tkubacki 13y ago
Not JavaScript, but Typescript. What if Typescript will implement now features incompatibile with future JS ?
277.
by tkubacki 13y ago
I don't want to troll here but "very compatible" sounds like MS best days of EEE - Typescript still IS a different lang. Question is what if future Javascript will go in a different direction than todays Typescript ? Typescri
278.
by tkubacki 13y ago
meh sorry - I mean: working ASP.NET mono ecommerce (no, not aspDotNetStorefront - ASP.NET MVC app on green field). I started when Mono was in Novell's hands and hoped they will push harder for C#/Web/Linux but it didn'
279.
by tkubacki 13y ago
I've got working asp.net ecommerce solutions, but for my last project went back to Java/Dropwizard/IntelliJ - it is just way better dev exp. + perf is much better on Linux. MS will be not interested in supporting competing (