tjoff

48 ms·

901.
by tjoff 4y ago
Looks like I was way of on both figures. Amazing huh.
902.
by tjoff 4y ago
I'm aware crime existed before crypto.
903.
by tjoff 4y ago
First google result says the worlds GDP is 91 billion USD. First google of (only) bitcoin value is 320 billion USD. How much theft occur in bitcoin every year? I don't know. It is not insignificant by any imaginable measure though. And
904.
by tjoff 4y ago
Nothing in that thread or linked threads provides anything that contradicts that statement that I could find. Please be more descriptive so that people actually get your point.
905.
by tjoff 4y ago
This is coming, I've been thinking that you should perhaps start to be skeptical of any content created by accounts later than 2022. Thinking of online reviews etc. where you don't have a proper log and can't follow a user pr
906.
by tjoff 4y ago
The amount of funding crypto has supplied organized crime is staggering.
907.
by tjoff 4y ago
I don't think so, two different faults.
908.
by tjoff 4y ago
This "solution" and mindset completely undermines the utility of a phone. Which at least I think is a grave mistake. You might argue that you barely use the phone as a phone, and that might have been a good argument if there was a
909.
by tjoff 4y ago
Surely depends on how cold it is? As well as amperage... In Sweden there were lot of reports of people being unable to charge with 230V 10A. Sure, you'd make sure to install a more powerful charger if necessary. But that requires you a
910.
by tjoff 4y ago
Only if it is logged in to the same account.
911.
by tjoff 4y ago
That sounds quite neat, however, this only works for your (spotify) account, right? The appeal of spotifyd from an end-user perspective is that anyone on the network can control it.
912.
by tjoff 4y ago
> If this already increases coding productivity by up to 50% (depending on kind of work) Does anyone believe that? edit: I'm surprised to see that (so far) 3 replies actually agree with the statement. Is there a video that you&#x2
913.
by tjoff 4y ago
I thought remote drivers were supposed to handle such issues?
914.
by tjoff 4y ago
A much much more expensive option? PTZ is really nice but for normal webcam use doesn't add much.
915.
by tjoff 4y ago
I'd argue that on a lossy network you will never have decent video (with decent latency) so for interactive sessions you don't really have to care about lossy network, it isn't worth the hassle anyway.
916.
by tjoff 4y ago
Miracast is, if I'm not mistaken, wireless only which in my mind makes it pretty darn useless. At least since all wireless implementations I've tried have been very flaky and after the first the initial "this is pretty cool&q
917.
by tjoff 4y ago
As opposed to male prostitutes?
918.
by tjoff 4y ago
Hardly an apt comparison.
919.
by tjoff 4y ago
You could buy something much better for $500 new. Something for $1000 bought a decade ago would be much better. Getting something used you could get way way lower than that. I'm aware that I am privileged (barely a tiny fraction of $20
920.
by tjoff 4y ago
Yes, but the 2008 CPU was 4 cores (and 8 GB of ram). Also, that is 4 real cores, compared to two logical cores. Probably still slower, but with much faster network. ~Comparable. Or maybe I got it wrong, both are still dog slow compared to a
921.
by tjoff 4y ago
This is also a big reason to self-host. Without this beta github offer: 2-core CPU (x86_64), 7 GB of RAM, 14 GB of SSD space Your last development machine that was thrown away is so much faster than this (and we do have great tools for admi
922.
by tjoff 4y ago
> What if every business owner has decided to make their business repulsive, because that's a winning strategy for them? Can anyone really make that argument though? Maybe making sites repulsive is the default because those that p
923.
by tjoff 4y ago
You can't? Why on earth would anyone use SSO? Are we that lazy?
924.
by tjoff 4y ago
Doesn't seem like that was the intention?
925.
by tjoff 4y ago
Well, I consider the system in the US to be dystopian and much worse than what we have here. The only problem we have is with home delivery and that is mostly been with US providers anyway. And it is explained partly because the US provider
926.
by tjoff 4y ago
> "What do you mean by that?" First of all it was answered by gorbypark , but I also answered it many times. You don't seem to keen on answering questions though. To make it real clear: You go to a website, put somethin
927.
by tjoff 4y ago
And if you live in an apartment and can't work from home? You let your $2000 package sit by the door? What if the package you have been waiting for three months happens to arrive during your one week vacation abroad? The package will w
928.
by tjoff 4y ago
Even if that argument would hold (which seriously doubt)... But, the completely unnecessary hundreds of thousands of trucks that saves people literally 5 minutes??? And the unimaginable number of man-years wasted on this? Incomprehensible
929.
by tjoff 4y ago
How does not-home-delivery work then? If I send a package to your address, how will you get it? Automatically by home delivery? When you send a package the only information provided is often the shipping address. If the service uses home-de
930.
by tjoff 4y ago
I'm not asking for ipv6-only, but ipv4-only. Those are the ones blocking adoption for me, as an end user.

More ›