Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tjoff
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
27 ms
·
451.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
WireViz is great, are there similar tools for other areas? I tried to find a good way to illustrate packets in a simple protocol and went for the bytefield package for latex (pdf manual https://texdoc.org/serve/bytefi
452.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
It has 4 settings, but those don't correspond to seconds https://owners.hyundaiusa.com/content/dam/hyundai/us/myhyund... (page 6-117). Quote: "For example, if you drive at 56 mph (90 km/h
453.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
What car is that? Of all the cars I've driven I've never encountered one that allows for more than ~2 seconds on the maximum setting. Thus leaving me a bit nervous. I'm almost hesitant to believe that any car on the market ha
454.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
90+ accuracy seems very optimistic. Still, I'd bet that whatever accuracy wearables get only work on a population, not individuals. I'm not surprised they are decent (though they can barely detect when you are sleeping...) but I
455.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
If it bothers you so much I'm happy to tell that that is not the reason for it.
456.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
As long as the creator didn't do anything wrong to trigger gmail/hotmails detections to go bad. And by wrong I mean violate the undocumented and completely arbitrary and self-fulfilling rules gmail et al employ.
457.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
IANAL, but I feel a bigger risk would be that you trigger it before it should. Maybe a bug in your emailserver or that the configuration option that you used to correctly turn off the spam-filter had a bug in it and caused some of the I
458.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
What is the rule that says something in the lines of: if you don't verify your backups you don't have backups. I feel that applies here, this doesn't need to take more than 10 seconds once a month (at least I would prefer it
459.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
> esp in cloud scenarios ... so the nice thing about the about the cloud is that you can workaround cloud-specific issues?
460.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
Though shouldn't be that hard to know if you are being spoofed. You probably have a decent idea of how much the IRS drifts and any large deviations from that or unexpected jumps in GPS should be noted and possibly, maybe manually, roll
461.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
I agree, so, lift weights? (Among other things...)
462.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
You can't downvote submissions regardless of karma.
463.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
There must be a disconnect here. We are talking about the privacy policy. Nothing else. The policy says that they don't collect, store, or process any personal data. That is great! What is not great is that the policy does not discuss
464.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
Pipelines should be simple, if you have all the logic in scripts/whatever as part of the repo. But rebuilding on another host is not the hard part. Rebuilding the community (and issue tracking etc.) is much harder. Especially since git
465.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
? > "Or something... such as information about files being sent... Or app telemetry etc." Information about files being sent could be anything from metadata, checksums, to something like (but not likely) CSAM. Could also be
466.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
What? Collect anything? They say they don't collect personal data. They don't mention what they do with non-personal data. > Frankly, being an open source app, I would be fine if it even said something like "It's open
467.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
That's why many only use Bluetooth to create an ad-hoc wifi network and do the transfer on that instead. Airdrop even requires bluetooth.
468.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
Doesn't say anything about what they share other than that they don't collect personal data...
469.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
From amazons perspective, sure! But that's not what we are discussing.
470.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
I agree, but something as simple (in functionality) as that ought to be an edge-case. Not a defining feature of S3.
471.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
Listing things is very common, so why would you outsource that to S3 when all your bookkeeping is elsewhere? It's not like you would ever rely on the POSIX API for that anyway, even for when your files actually are on a POSIX filesyste
472.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
But surely you need to track that elsewhere anyway? That some niche edge-case runs efficiently doesn't sound like a defining feature of S3. On the contrary many common operations map terrible to S3, so you kind of need the logic to be
473.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
Is listing really such a key feature that people use it as a database to find objects? Have not used S3, but that is not how I imagined using it.
474.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
Yeah we get to choose between google and apple. Lucky us...
475.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
I agree, I meant the experience of buying books.
476.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
Spotify etc. helped curb piracy because it was convenient. Ebooks should be convenient, but are not. The experience is much worse than physical books and barely any cheaper. It pains me everytime I try to buy one. Then came the ipad, and wh
477.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
That is great :) I will look into it, from a first glance collaboration seems to only be on a per album basis? Can you have nested albums? For a group of friends / family you'd probably want many tens of albums tracking different
478.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
New to me, looks nice. But I'm a bit perplexed by the lack of functionality regarding group access. You typically want to have a place for your family to manage your photos. A completely separate one for friends etc. Yet I don't s
479.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
The whole point of serverless is to trick people into insane pricing.
480.
▲
by
tjoff
3y ago
Sure, but you stifle a lot of avenues to start a conversation when you look at your phone. And you raise the bar for conversations to be worthwhile. Which becomes a problem when a lot of high-quality conversations start from mindless small
More ›