Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tito
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
25 ms
·
301.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Check out Ryan's Negative Emissions reading list: https://www.orbuch.com/nets-reading-list "Carbon Removal 101": http://bit.ly/carbonremoval-101 (I helped write this one) Covers a reading li
302.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
It's the difference between using and selling to another country. For example, let's say my energy demand for 1 year is 1 GW. I generate that 1 GW using solar. But I sell 50% of it to a neighbor. Inside my house, I use gas for tha
303.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Yes, I wanna get that "secure" bling
304.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Great feedback. Were you looking for your country in particular, or what would you like to do with a country-level sort?
305.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
I would love to add this info! Any suggestions how to pull this data or how to display it? tito@impossiblelabs.io
306.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Nice! Add your company to AirMiners, the largest index of companies mining carbon fro the air: http://airminers.org We'll feature it on the top of the list.
307.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
That looks like a powerful tool! I've been on the lookout for something interactive like that for awhile, only saw desktop-based simulators. Nice find, curious where you came across it.
308.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Surprising they include Direct Air Capture as CCS. Here's the more detailed 32 page PDF that accompanies the linked CCS article: https://pub.cicero.oslo.no/cicero-xmlui/bitstream/handle/112... I publish
309.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
But what if it did succeed?
310.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Just 6,000,000 topics of interest to cover all of history. That's about 1 per 1,000 people on the planet. There are 5.6 million small businesses in the United States alone. [1] Imagine a Wikipedia that had more like 6 trillion articles
311.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Completely agree on the "Carbon and Climate" section. Negative makes a carbon negative bracelet made with carbon dioxide pulled from the atmosphere. I created the company to make carbon more personal. http://gonegative.
312.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Wow appreciate hearing your story! Yes, please email me, tito@impossiblelabs.io I was just showing off the planter at a party in SF yesterday, it's such an icon. I write a weekly newsletter on carbon removal, check it out here: http:&
313.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Nice! Got a favorite tree scale up plan?
314.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Heck yeah! We worked with Carbon Engineering on our first carbon negative product (a planter pot). And we're working with Climeworks on our carbon negative bracelet: http://gonegative.co
315.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Awesome! What have people seen from the performance of these types of corporate venture capital funds? I'm guessing a lot of it will go towards carbon neutral, but I'm most excited about the carbon removal pieces like Direct air c
316.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
To get involved in these biohacker projects check out: BioCurious (Santa Clara) http://biocurious.org/ Counter Culture Labs (Oakland): https://www.counterculturelabs.org/
317.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
The tent/camping mode looks cool. I’m excited to make an autonomous truck + RV my next home.
318.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
1. Start now. But don't use @fastmail.com as your email address. Get a personal domain and email address (i.e. me@efiecho.com), and forward it to fastmail. 2. Setup fastmail as the host for me@efiecho.com 3. Have your gmail account for
319.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Deleted my FitBit account when I read the news.
320.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Here's a relevant article from the publication Nature: "Substantial global carbon uptake by cement carbonation" https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo2840 Coverage of Nature letter in the popular press: Co
321.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Hmm I'm thinking something more like the "Streisand Effect" or "getting Rickrolled".
322.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Is there a pithy name for the “law” that any company that collects your data and promises its private will eventually sell it?
323.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Yea great point, we have to figure out what matters, meaningful change in the broader perspective!
324.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Looking good, Richard! Hop on this thread and join the discussions: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21408415 EDIT: looks like you're already there. Nice work! Put contact info in your profile, I get a surprising n
325.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
I wonder the same thing! A mandate doesn't always have an upfront dollar cost, but it's certainly being paid for somehow. For example, subsidies on EVs. These shifts are tricky since they alter the market, so we have to figure out
326.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Appreciate the opportunity to dive in and read this myself! The story doesn't "change", that's the abstract where they're presenting the different pieces of research covered in the paper. It's like they're
327.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Yeah, I completely know what you're talking about in terms of water versus carbon dioxide. I work on climate solutions every day. My specific focus is on carbon and mining carbon from the air. However, loss of groundwater and water dep
328.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Nice assessment! Living in California, it's so tempting for me to point to the latest drought as "proof of climate change". But I find it safer to keep my climate discussions longer term, i.e. rising seas, overall warmer tem
329.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Yes, consensus. From NASA’s https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/# "The number of papers rejecting AGW [Anthropogenic, or human-caused, Global Warming] is a miniscule proportion of the published research,
330.
▲
by
tito
7y ago
Yes that’s the one cited by NASA as well. J. Cook, et al, "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming," Environmental Research Letters Vol. 11 No. 4, (13 April 2016); DOI:10.1088/
More ›