Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tinfoilhatter
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
4mo ago
They don't require commercial licenses though, because they're not large enough to and don't serve a commercial purpose when transporting families / their things. Plenty of families have the need for third-row seating an
32.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
4mo ago
Plenty of minivans also have tall hoods. I assume by combi you're talking about a station wagon, and in that case you're trading cargo capacity and the ability to tow boats / trailers / campers / etc... Ego has noth
33.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
4mo ago
> I will give them whatever they want to get past the hurdle and use the service. Why? Why not just hold firm to your principles and sacrifice convenience for your personal sovereignty. When you don't, you make the situation worse f
34.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
4mo ago
Please stop saying we - because many of us didn't ever desire or contribute (outside of having our code / data / IP stolen) to these models or the companies developing them. Many of us weren't willingly singing up to use
35.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
4mo ago
How can you pay attention, as a student, to a historical event that isn't being taught to you in your history class? Please explain.
36.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
4mo ago
Who defines what is extremist propaganda? The people who win the propaganda war and get to label the other side as extremists is the answer.
37.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
4mo ago
I just said what I meant - what we are taught about WWII and Weimar Germany in school isn't anything approaching the truth. For example: https://www.archives.gov/research/foreign-policy/katyn-massa...
38.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
4mo ago
No, the argument for distributing it would be that other propaganda is widely distributed without question, so if one wants to arrive at anything even close to an objective account of what transpired during that time in history, all propaga
39.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
I think the optimum level changes based on whether or not citizens are being actively brutalized by an authoritarian government and their police forces en masse. When that happens, the optimum level is a lot and when it's not happening
40.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
I guess my point was - you're one of the people you're complaining about if you're not revolting yourself. I also am not of the opinion that violent revolution would fix anything for the better, but that's not really rel
41.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
Now that we know how positive reinforcement works, and why negative doesn’t, we can be more deliberate and hence more successful, in our cultural design. We can achieve a sort of control under which the controlled… nevertheless feel free. T
42.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
What would you suggest people do about it?
43.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
Voted on by the people, and yet in 2026 we have no way to actually confirm our votes are counted or factored into who gets elected. Every single US president is related, sans Van Buren, but there's no way our elections are rigged! Not
44.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
I wish people would stop saying we created this hell, as if everyone had a choice as to whether or not they grew up in this increasingly dystopian reality. Blame the people that are actually to blame, not everyone else. It's a tired ta
45.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
The Gnostics were essentially a mystery school, but they are often framed as a heresy of Christianity led by St. Thomas. They taught that the material world was fundamentally flawed and created by a deity (not God) that they referred to as
46.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
I would agree with you. I think people are searching for something and attempt to find it in all sorts of forms. The truth is, nothing was missing all-along it just takes some self-realization / actualization to realize that, and that
47.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
Probably about as safe as trusting the people editing Wikipedia that also are attending Wikipedia Zionist editing conferences I imagine.
48.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
I like how Wikipedia is referred to as the world's encyclopedia, while stuff like this goes on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t52LB2fYhoY
49.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
What are the penalties for not doing so? I'm always amazed at the willingness of Europeans to follow rules like these, regardless of their impact on personal sovereignty. People in Finland were the most extreme example of this behavior
50.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
Yeah, who cares that there's a group with the goal of establishing a new world order featuring a totalitarian one-world government and a one-world religion that enforces Noahide law. Sounds lovely! /s This logic is absolutely ridi
51.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
> In this regard, Saint John Paul II stated that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, proclaimed by the United Nations on 10 December 1948, remains one of the highest expressions of the human conscience of our time. Interesting, co
52.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
Luciferian is not an esoteric epithet. The UN is and was advised by Alice Bailey and the Lucis trust she created, which used to be called the Lucifer trust. You're simply displaying your ignorance and on top of it, acting like a comple
53.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
The context of the original post was that people should check the sources they are sharing with others, and Snopes was suggested as a source worth sharing. I disagree that Snopes is a reliable source of information or has any interest in pr
54.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
Where did I attack you lol? The only time I said the word demonstrate, which you put quotes around, is when I said that I could demonstrate they receive funding from big / tech and philanthropic organizations whose narratives they prom
55.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
IMO it's because people have fragile egos / worldviews they don't want shaken. Pretty much any opinion I type on this website gets instantly downvoted, unless it reaffirms the popular / mainstream narrative, because I ha
56.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
I never said you should trust my links, you should do your own research. What I did say is that bias is impossible to avoid and I implied that believing that there's a source of objective truth on the internet because it's been de
57.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
Where did I say nothing can be verified? I'm strictly talking about the internet, which is a curated source of information. Are we going to pretend that search results Google doesn't like aren't returned by a query? Why can I
58.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
Think about what you're asking me for here - you're asking me to produce examples of claims Snopes has made that are factually incorrect, when the results of search engines are curated by companies that pay the salaries of Snopes
59.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-4730092/Snopes-brink-... It was far more than drama about managers / hosters.
60.
▲
by
tinfoilhatter
5mo ago
https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-4730092/Snopes-brink-... https://foodbabe.com/do-you-trust-snopes-you-wont-after-read... There's a plethora of examples on the internet of Snopes engagi
More ›