Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
timcobb
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
91.
▲
by
timcobb
2mo ago
> Bizarre. This is easily the most casually bizarre HN saga that I've experienced...
92.
▲
by
timcobb
2mo ago
Probably not china so much as Taiwan, japan, other places
93.
▲
by
timcobb
2mo ago
> We got a Pentium III 550 MHz screamer Super nice
94.
▲
by
timcobb
2mo ago
Who cares about Pangram? Why do you care about Pangram? Why not leverage our own intelligence? How does this post read to you? To me, it does not read like it was written by AI.
95.
▲
by
timcobb
2mo ago
not all crime is illegal, unfortunately.
96.
▲
by
timcobb
2mo ago
Pangram is just some BS man can you please stop
97.
▲
by
timcobb
2mo ago
It's just the ol', "I don't need privacy because I have nothing to hide" routine, which is, in fact, the naive perspective.
98.
▲
by
timcobb
2mo ago
Codex turns over 256k windows for *days/weeks on end* without seemingly much fidelity loss, especially with a goal that anchors it to a durable plan/ledger.
99.
▲
by
timcobb
2mo ago
Did you give it access to a planner/analyzer?
100.
▲
by
timcobb
2mo ago
Codex uses 256k masterfully, 1M is luxurious but still quite expensive and seems not necessary as a default.
101.
▲
by
timcobb
2mo ago
This kind of reads like a blood libel. My guess is they're buying all those books that University libraries are throwing away these days (to see other HM threads for that), kinda sad but probably aren't "rare books" in t
102.
▲
by
timcobb
2mo ago
For some new custom small thing you'd be better off using not this though, right?
103.
▲
by
timcobb
3mo ago
What's the related stack
104.
▲
by
timcobb
3mo ago
> One reading is that it was more productive. Another is that most of those commits were busywork (thrash, contention, churn). Kudos
105.
▲
by
timcobb
3mo ago
> It leads to an awful experience for a large fraction of users. can you give an example of why/how? I thought it was well done and enjoyable. Regular fast scroll was still as expected, and then the slower interactions felt like sli
106.
▲
by
timcobb
3mo ago
And this is why we need title insurance :(
107.
▲
by
timcobb
3mo ago
The worst stack overflow in this regard was meta. Most pathological corner of the internet I've ever encountered, up there with 4chan if you ask me.
108.
▲
by
timcobb
3mo ago
Humans aren't sheep but in the broad average it seems like we have a strong tendency to fall inline. Fwiw I was mostly joking. I agree that the techno overlords have no reason to keep us, unlike in Roman times.
109.
▲
by
timcobb
3mo ago
I can't stop wondering myself.... I'm writing some software with AI and wondering, why am I doing this? Will anyone need this? Will anyone have money to buy this? Best I've come up with is we'll need to be adopted by tec
110.
▲
by
timcobb
3mo ago
What do you like about AGPL in this context? Building a similar product and curious! Thanks
111.
▲
by
timcobb
3mo ago
Drones are only part of the equation you need to be able to forge things
112.
▲
by
timcobb
3mo ago
When there's a war and you need sovereignty how would open mining be unthinkable
113.
▲
by
timcobb
3mo ago
I meant working around the big tech hegemony, working around code just takes patience and is nice.
114.
▲
by
timcobb
3mo ago
Well, no. If the project is being shut down because its target(s) went away, then that seems unavoidable. It would be good, IMO, if people could come together and build out an open mobile platform not subject to SV hegemony, so I think what
115.
▲
by
timcobb
3mo ago
From the minimal context I got, it seems like there are underlying platform access problems in the way. In my experience, attempting to work around these issues is demoralizing.
116.
▲
by
timcobb
3mo ago
Thank you! So in your mind, it would be a big investment of human time/tokens and the big obstacle, ultimately, is Big Tech?
117.
▲
by
timcobb
3mo ago
So what's the point of spending months and months and months of your time just to shut down your project when it could possibly be worked out for several $100? Is the situation that the authors have a lot of time and no money? Could we
118.
▲
by
timcobb
3mo ago
To me I seems like it was an attempt at a privacy focused application for communication, but it's now in maintenance mode.
119.
▲
by
timcobb
3mo ago
I would imagine pretty good if it's actually just a code issue
120.
▲
by
timcobb
3mo ago
Who spent the time to make this? If those people spent countless hours doing it by hand, maybe they would be willing to spend an analogous resource? It seems reasonable to me if you've already invested so much and paid in time. But yea
More ›