Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tick_tock_tick
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
31.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
3mo ago
No one actually believes their BS and I doubt you actually do either. They use so many bullshit and mental gymnastics to "score" Germany well despite their appalling "free speech" laws. I think it's very fair to say
32.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
3mo ago
Europe has given up on advancing anything and their only solutions to problems is regulations.
33.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
3mo ago
lol and who's going to enforce it? The only things enforced are when USA/Russia/China care about it.
34.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
3mo ago
Yes, but classically insurance wouldn't allow a guaranteed bad bet in. Health care is way worse then the classic 80/20 (20% of the people generate 80% of the costs). Pruning even just a fraction of these ultra high cost humans mas
35.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
3mo ago
A lot of physics, at-least appears, to end up at quantization which actually really bothers me.
36.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
That's the purpose of statute of limitations.
37.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
I mean of course if not 10,000 people could stand in a room, watch someone murder another, and then all 10,000 come and testify exactly who it was and what the jury would not be allowed to convict?
38.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
> Current AI companies stole much data from Internet without permissions, and used the knowledge of many people directly shamelessly. So? It's not illegal and no one seem to be in any hurry to make it. That is a moral dilemma that e
39.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
There are still bespoke craftsman in this era of machinery and assembly lines. You choosing to do something in one specific manner is more the exception that proves the rule then any rebuttal.
40.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
> I agree that it should require an act of Congress to explicitly delegate this power. Should ever new "weapon" invented require a new act of Congress? We've considered software subject this act since the 90s. If everyone
41.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
> I think they’d try to get something through Congress to regulate the industry in a rules-based way. Is that a joke? We're back in a spat with Iran because Obama refused to engage with Congress, as required by our constitution, to
42.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
So it's not prepaid?
43.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
Most of those things a tiny rounding error. Interest and social services are the only thing the government actually spends money on.
44.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
Almost no other country has it's government pretending to be so many different entities.
45.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
For profit capitalism, and smashing of near monopoly pricing power, and questionable morals.
46.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
> Why leave: Sick of U.S. politics and the way it directly and indirectly affects us and how difficult it is to escape from it - it’s a major point of conversations with family and friends, it’s on the local radio, local subreddit, local
47.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
He said Canada man. If you had other reasonable options when leaving you wouldn't pick it so lets not pretend anyone moving there from the USA didn't fail already.
48.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
I'm not sure I understand? That case says training was explicitly legal perfectly validating their whole business model. The money they paid was for pirating books rather then buying them.
49.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
No one writing anything that needs performance cares about some standard library ABI issues. Rust already has warts from bad API designs that constrains performance and they are unlikely to ever be fixed even with new editions. Rust will co
50.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
Until Rust has equal meta-programming support to C++ it's always going to be "slower". That's why people always say this because it's always true there is nothing Rust can do C++ can't but there is quite a few
51.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
You can do that just fine. Huge swaths of people just use the Amazon app store or the Samsung One. F-Droid is also an option if you don't want to make any accounts.
52.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
I mean as a passive investor this stuff should terrify you. You're learning that your "passive" is actually quite active. It's why people suggest VTI over VOO/SPY for "true" passive. If you want to be acti
53.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
I mean these rule changes have been a long time coming. SpaceX was just the straw that broke the camels back here. These major index's want to stay relevant and cutting out some of the biggest companies in the market just opens the way
54.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
This is just the dude that's famous for getting Tesla wrong constantly? If he's convinced it's going south it's probably an easy 100% gain from the IPO.
55.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
4mo ago
Maybe? It certainly behaves like it does but it might not.
56.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
5mo ago
You can in the USA too. Every Walmart in the country (and by god there are a lot of them) caries OTC insulin for $20-$25.
57.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
5mo ago
Pretty sure every thread has a massive chain about them being a NSA honey pot.
58.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
5mo ago
> This is the part that is the wildest to me. The current system seems to generate a collection of second-class citizens What do you mean seems too. The biggest proponents of immigration routinely ask "who's going to work the f
59.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
5mo ago
I mean we don't really have any counter examples even China didn't really start advancing in any meaningful way until they started moving towards capitalism.
60.
▲
by
tick_tock_tick
5mo ago
They pivoted away from that quite a while ago now they just disappear people for a week or two and randomly completely crush a business here and there to make sure they understand their place.
More ›