tiberious726

9 ms·

31.
by tiberious726 1y ago
Exactly this. Hell, for OP's use case of accessing things like twitter, a good old fashioned https proxy would be entirely fine, and likely not even illegal.
32.
by tiberious726 1y ago
Didn't the terms of that deal define AGI as "an AI that generates at least 1 billion in annual revenue"?
33.
by tiberious726 1y ago
If you use the -m flag with enroll-keys, won't that also load the MS keys, which the Nvidia firmware should be signed by, allowing verification to pass?
34.
by tiberious726 1y ago
Eh, that's basically what we have now with boards where you can delete the MS keys and enroll your own. Just with different defaults and no support nightmare
35.
by tiberious726 1y ago
Firefox is not fine. If you think it is, please tell me how to disable BASIC http auth in it. (This is a serious problem, as it will send passwords unencrypted over a non SSL connection, and my users have been trained to type their sso pass
36.
by tiberious726 2y ago
Step 1) world war 3 Step 2) some drunk invents FTL Step 3) the Vulcans show up
37.
by tiberious726 2y ago
If the client actually supports the optional name constraint extension. Is it acceptabley widespread nowadays?
38.
by tiberious726 2y ago
Eh, I tried using Firefox again for a few months when manifest v3 was announced, nothing worked quite right, then I ran into this: https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/firefox-chromium.ht...
39.
by tiberious726 2y ago
So Red Hat Openshift.
40.
by tiberious726 2y ago
Everyone I know who works with IBM i (used to be system i, as/400 before that) absolutely adores it. Gods do they every nickel and dime you tho.
41.
by tiberious726 2y ago
> The real thing that made me switch was multiple OS updates per week You're complaining about timely security updates?
42.
by tiberious726 2y ago
TPM+PIN is pretty great, is a shame it's nearly never used.
43.
by tiberious726 2y ago
You just need to use a lisp implementation that has a tree-shaker if you really care about binary size for since reason
44.
by tiberious726 2y ago
I always preferred this one: https://youtu.be/5-OjTPj7K54?si=TYuCLJ9_2WvRHcHM
45.
by tiberious726 2y ago
> That has been done in the past Could you share some examples of how the old systems did this?
46.
by tiberious726 2y ago
My favorite is pressing '!' while inside a sudoed or setuid less.
47.
by tiberious726 2y ago
No: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Va... In practice, everyone writing new projects uses it, but when you choose to interact with existing code...
48.
by tiberious726 2y ago
> if I ever win the lottery and don't need a job I'm going to spend some time learning Plan 9. I'd recommend adding OpenGenera and IBM's systems I and Z to that list: a whole bunch of us build careers out of unnecessa
49.
by tiberious726 2y ago
C-u N C-y where N is the number of pastes. Yeah, some DE clipboards implement kill-yank sensitive. They're great!
50.
by tiberious726 2y ago
With 128 bit pointers encoding security and providence information. And a unified memory space, no files, just addresses with RAM as a cache for persistent disks. Might as well be from 2080.
51.
by tiberious726 2y ago
Welcome to IBM. Each new acronym is an extra fee, annually.
52.
by tiberious726 2y ago
Z/OS systems are rackmount nowadays too, they just take up the full 42U. At least back in the POWER8 days those z/Linux systems were the fastest you could buy, and IBM was super happy to let you overclock them: their reps told me
53.
by tiberious726 2y ago
Better? Kill-yank semantics give you a full kill-ring, that's what your yanking from. CUA gives you a single copy-slot.
54.
by tiberious726 2y ago
First off, thanks for all your work on graphene! I run cyber security for a company in the defense space, with data-sovereignty requirements, and you guys are the only serious project around. You should think about selling support contacts,
55.
by tiberious726 2y ago
Common lisp -> elisp is an incredibly frustration transition. Get ready to really think in terms of dynamic scoping. I did it the other way, and going back to elisp is /hard/.
56.
by tiberious726 2y ago
The strong version is disproven in the original paper: they mention concepts that cannot be expressed in English and then proceed to explain them. In English.
57.
by tiberious726 2y ago
Eh, the TPM is a hell of a lot less functional than security processor on a modem arm board. You can seal and unseal based on system state, but once things are unsealed, it's just in memory
58.
by tiberious726 2y ago
Entry level textbooks. It's one of those things they intentionally teach wrong to first year students in an attempt to "simplify"
59.
by tiberious726 2y ago
Bearing in mind Arrow's impossibility theorem, why do you believe ranked choice is an obviously better voting mechanism?
60.
by tiberious726 2y ago
Eh, growing up around the same time as you, I think that's just how it's always looked to certain parents.

More ›