thysultan

10 ms·

61.
by thysultan 6y ago
If it worked it wouldn't be happening, the fact that it is happening, and to well known country's proofs they don't work and is profitable for country B and C for it to continue to not work. This not withstanding the obfuscat
62.
by thysultan 6y ago
Add Country C into the mix: It doesn't produce carbon but doesn't have tariff's on Country B. >It's pretty simple, this has been thought out You and others alike have clearly not thought this out as the scenario i hav
63.
by thysultan 6y ago
country B sells to country C that does the final packaging and then sells it to you. This is happening right now if you haven't already noticed.
64.
by thysultan 6y ago
You tax carbon, country B now has an advantage over you. You loose! Now all your products are produced in country B, you've changed nothing and country B is probably using coal so you're worse off from your initial goal. You loose
65.
by thysultan 6y ago
You tax industrial bitcoin miners that you can detect, country A now has an advantage over you. You loose! You actually haven't changed anything it has just moved to another country that is probably using coal. You loose!
66.
by thysultan 6y ago
It's not an attack vector precisely because of that. Another scenario is the 1% could just then continue mining non-empty blocks from where the attacker left of which would make them the most accurate blockchain with regards to proof o
67.
by thysultan 6y ago
For the first attack listed you'd need to be the 99% of mining power at which point the 1% could also just fork and leave you to your endeavours.
68.
by thysultan 6y ago
DeepFuckingValue(Reddit username), Keith Gill and Roaring Kitty(youtube username) are the same person.
69.
by thysultan 6y ago
>that uses tons and tons of energy to even exist and operate Compared to what? The banking industry? Do you know how much it takes to send/secure 100 tons of gold? bitcoin comparatively is minuscule, energy use is going to increase
70.
by thysultan 6y ago
Oh, so not the material nominal pound for pound cost?
71.
by thysultan 6y ago
Plastic is more expensive?
72.
by thysultan 6y ago
Think of it as a productive carbon sink for all that ancient dead organic matter.
73.
by thysultan 6y ago
You could exit the country and do whatever you want if it's come to that.
74.
by thysultan 6y ago
It will be easier than you think: You could just send crypto to a friend and they wire me the equivalent in $ with india being non-the-wiser.
75.
by thysultan 6y ago
They expect it to reach 500-1000, if they are patient and right they'll probably find gold.
76.
by thysultan 6y ago
Maybe cause $BB&B is close to $BB, either the bots are mistaking it for $BB or the WSB "retards" are. Either way there's a bit of a "rocketship emoji" drive for $BB on WSB.
77.
by thysultan 6y ago
ⓘ This claim about election fraud is disputed.
78.
by thysultan 6y ago
Yes! uBlock origin is the biggest thing keeping me from going to Safari, that and the Stylus extension(or something like it).
79.
by thysultan 6y ago
The appeal of gravitational propulsion is in replacing xyz propulsion fuel with electricity regardless of medium(vacuum or not).
80.
by thysultan 6y ago
>In JavaScript My heart rate is just now over the roof
81.
by thysultan 6y ago
Then stop using the word global warming, poor marketing, when it gets cools(which it will) instead of warm it starts to look and sound a con. The more enlightened skeptics are more so "human caused" climate change skeptics than an
82.
by thysultan 6y ago
Can an adversary launch a a first attack, given the latency this introduces? can an adversary await for a solar flare to disturb comms to launch?
83.
by thysultan 6y ago
All governments would have to follow suit in lock step for that to work, at which point you have far bigger problems, i.e why not just nuke the internet all together, far easier.
84.
by thysultan 6y ago
>Isn't that the same as printing money Yes, if electricity was FREE, at which point printing money is the best next logical step as you've achieved free energy with utopia just around the corner.
85.
by thysultan 6y ago
gasoline cars also use a battery to initiate the engine.
86.
by thysultan 6y ago
battery
87.
by thysultan 6y ago
Like how a gun works, essentially a battery for the initial motion, using the subsequent motion storing some for the next initial motion.
88.
by thysultan 6y ago
>Where would you get the energy to split the water? From a battery.
89.
by thysultan 6y ago
The idea is to use water as the fuel and convert to hydrogen just in time for combustion.
90.
by thysultan 6y ago
This is like awaiting for Moore's law for your apps to run faster. 30 years is a lifetime in post-y2k tech years.

More ›