thyristan

22 ms·

331.
by thyristan 2y ago
Ah, that explains the downvotes. Sorry. My browser just doesn't send a referrer for clicked links, so I didn't notice.
332.
by thyristan 2y ago
Yes. Just imagine the Binary stars being very close compared to the distance to the habitable world. E.g. two sun-like stars in sun-mercury distance, and an earth-like planet somewhere between mars and jupiter. Three-body problems can be ch
333.
by thyristan 2y ago
It can be true for some people. Look at the lower right one on the xray here: https://www.jwz.org/gruntle/wisdom-teeth.html
334.
by thyristan 2y ago
Because the definition given is useless. Additives I wouldn't use as a home-cook, thickener or emulsifier make it ultra-processed. So anything with a thickener or emulsifier is ultra-processed? So now my potato-soup is ultra-processed
335.
by thyristan 2y ago
We do mostly have a problem with ultra-unspecific, ultra-unsubstantiated, ultra-agenda-driven and ultra-useless nutritional advice. The lacking proper definition of ultra-processed foods is just one part of it. How much is "much"?
336.
by thyristan 2y ago
I know of some remote¹ forest in Germany that used to be a training area. It is so bullet- and bomb-riddled that they just decided clearing it wasn't worth it, put a fence around it and declared it off-limits. ¹ in Germany, "remot
337.
by thyristan 2y ago
You are not wrong. Career isn't everything. A job is there to earn money first, fun second. Perpetual promotions aren't in that list at all.
338.
by thyristan 2y ago
Only very small motor boats are agile enough that you can turn on a dime and not loose sight of a man-over-board. And even then, it strongly depends on wind, current and boat speed. Also, orientation on the seas, sense of direction and gett
339.
by thyristan 2y ago
fail2ban is dangerous imho. First, it will only block high-frequency maliciousness. If an attacker knows to stay below the default ban frequencies, or change endpoints often enough, they will have free reign. Second, fail2ban is a DoS risk,
340.
by thyristan 2y ago
Even if all passengers were alive at the time of a water landing, getting out of a plane is tricky in the best of conditions. Getting out of a damaged, rapidly sinking plane is very hard or maybe impossible. Also, if you would get out of th
341.
by thyristan 2y ago
> We don't know what is valuable so we should assume that it is all valuable. That is a very messy approach to conservation...
342.
by thyristan 2y ago
I don't know if there are digital scans. But that there aren't proves the OPs point that researchers can't be THAT interested after all, if they didn't even take scans of the documents.
343.
by thyristan 2y ago
An industry isn't viable if it can only exist with subsidies.
344.
by thyristan 2y ago
Looking at the behaviour of e.g. Hungary as an EU member state and Russian puppet at the same time, I'd like to disagree here.
345.
by thyristan 2y ago
Agreed. Also: the originals are mostly only relevant for their collectible value. Researchers can more easily work off digital scans. No need to buy anything or keep anything together physically, just scan it if you are really that interest
346.
by thyristan 2y ago
The real trick would be for the company higher-ups to recognize that there is a problem and impose the rules in the original article as binding company policy.
347.
by thyristan 2y ago
Which will lead to the senior colleagues being swamped by questions that a junior could have answered. Ticket or bust. That way the question can go the proper way from cheap junior supporters to expensive senior ones (if necessary). It can
348.
by thyristan 2y ago
No, they won't. For example: Tickets are easier to discover, don't suffer from bus-factor=1, act as searchable documentation, can easily be handed over to another team if misrouted, can be queued and prioritized, all those nice th
349.
by thyristan 2y ago
> Is "water cooler talk" the new "open office layout"? Yes. It used to be that "water cooler talk" was considered an unproductive waste of time. But for people pushing an RTO agenda, it suddenly became the g
350.
by thyristan 2y ago
DCO is something like "Signed-of-by: me myself <me@example.com>" you have to actively add to your contributions, which is usually a conscious and willful act that is far more complex than blindly ticking a box (or even leavi
351.
by thyristan 2y ago
Either performance or stability/reliability. Or even both. At higher frequencies (during a frequency boost phase for example) signal quality in the digital signals degrades, because the "stable 1" or "stable 0" plat