Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
throwhauser
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
> Crypto has many examples of people leaving $100m+ on the table so they can properly fix a vulnerability. It all comes back to trust.
32.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
What exactly on that page indicates that "we'll fund it back up" has occurred?
33.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
How many claims have they paid out?
34.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
> “ETH will be added over the next hours to ensure wETH is backed 1:1,” the protocol wrote. Where would the ETH come from?
35.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
Why not?
36.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
I don't think it's necessarily the sounds, but what the article describes, "bringing the pleasure of playing a musical instrument to everyone". New ways of creating music end up in the hands of people that otherwise may
37.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
> The evolution of true vertebrates proceeded from this condition by neoteny Thanks for the explanation! Slightly less freaked out now.
38.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
It freaks me out that tunicates are chordates. How can a creature's body plan get that bizarre, from a starting point similar to vertebrates? They're not just dissimilar to familiar animals, they're barely recognizable as
39.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
Days late and this will probably go unread by anyone, but further evidence that GDPR compliance is complicated, and it's difficult to avoid fines: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30135264 "GDPR penalty for pa
40.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
> Don't interact with contracts directly unless you 100% know what you're doing. But if you use any of the exchanges you described, you have to trust that they 100% know what they're doing. It seems safer to avoid smart co
41.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
I don't know about that, see section Q K5 here: https://www.irs.gov/credits-deductions/2021-child-tax-credit... To me it reads like Letter 6416 is meant to add specificity to "the letter" in the previous
42.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
I've been wondering why login.gov wasn't the choice in the first place, and the only thing I can think of is that id.me seems to portray itself as a fraud-busting identity service, whereas login.gov is simply a sign-in service. S
43.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
I've been wondering just how mandatory id.me is. Out of curiosity I tried to find if there was a way to address the problem you mentioned without using id.me. Buried very deeply in the Q & A via a link called "alternative op
44.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
The point isn't to convince cryptocurrency users, the point is to convince the average person ("the public").
45.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
It actually is mysterious though. Not mentioning the mystery would be click-repellent.
46.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
> The societies telesilla and Blahah are referring to are not ones where a housekeeper works 40 hour weeks Mon to Fri and gets PTO Nor is the "high-growth" tech sector, which is notorious for long hours and de-facto little time
47.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
Because you've combined two concerns, the amount of money people make, and what level of stratification is involved in making it. You can study, train, and improve your economic security considerably, but still end up essentially doin
48.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
> Because the better way to spread opportunity is to use that money to pay for poorer people to get an education so they do not have to do menial tasks for richer people. ...and then a data scientist with an advanced degree spends the da
49.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
> Are you making this more complicated than it needs to be? I'm not sure. I guess if one trusts the default logging settings on the server software to be compliant, and only uses static HTML, maybe that's adequate? But as soo
50.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
How can a small website cope with GDPR compliance though? The rules that sprang up to constrain the social-media behemoths seem onerous for anyone but them to comply with.
51.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
I guess the takeaway here is that it might be better to de-google-ize yourself on your own initiative than to deal with having it done to you unexpectedly.
52.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
How much of the money is going to artists though, and how much to opportunistic NFT "drops" of random junk that are borrowing legitimacy from actual artists?
53.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
It did somehow manage to have a lot of good content, but it made it too difficult to access. I haven't looked at any Medium stuff in a long time, but if I recall correctly highlighting text wouldn't allow you to copy it, but woul
54.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
There should be an option to use the "numbers" that are prime in a different universe.
55.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
With the potential for a 10 million euro fine, I don't think "basically certain" is sufficient.
56.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
It is that hard. The level of certainty you need when "less serious" fines have 8 digits is hard even if you're just running HTTP "Hello World" on port 80 on the internet. The risk of a mistake in your configurati
57.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
Presumably because the fines for getting GDPR wrong are potentially very high, where "less severe infringements could result in a fine of up to €10 million" and more serious infringements "could result in a fine of up to €20
58.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
It's disconcerting that id.me seems to be managing access to government services and some kind of online shopping mall at the same time: https://shop.id.me/
59.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
If it pushes all companies to be clear about their potential GDPR issues, I'm all for it. Let them compete on ease of compliance. As it is, it's very difficult to tell if something you're using is gathering data that you don
60.
▲
by
throwhauser
5y ago
> ipad on a music stand Thanks for the idea. I might get some kind of tablet so I can watch things without moving my (cheap) stationary bike in front of the living room TV.
More ›