Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
throwbadubadu
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
> The fraud uncovered in X recently gives us a clear example of how entire areas of Y can be compromised and subverted for decades Yes, bad humans, need more checks and balances. > my gut feeling is that Z in Y is fraud ... > get u
62.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
My story plot would sure include LLM (coefficients file as today) + code to run it. So 80s humans could run it on the Cray, ask it questions, and get answers (after some time :D). LLM could explain itself what it is.. (if there are not more
63.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
> The outcome is transistors capable of operating at terahertz frequencies, offering speeds 10 times as fast as that of the silicon-based transistors used in current chips. Why? We are single digit gigahertz, so terahertzes should be ~ 1
64.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
Find it similarly amazing, yes. > This means that the Cray could run it Gladly, we had better things to do than that :D But seriously, while we could have run it maybe speedwise, it definitely lacked the memory, not? And if one tried to
65.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
Didn't doubt that, but that tragedy was not the point of the "embafflement"-response to the "embafflement"-statement actually, what was my point, so pointless in total, same as you now calling that out again...
66.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
That was due to missing stairs? And there is a difference between skyscrapers and 3-6 story multi-apartment buildings where in the worst case you can even exit fine with fire truck ladders or assisted jumps, but the article says even requi
67.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
> This is what happens when sewage is given time to cool: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3i_axpk0a7Q First thought when scrolling quickly to the fatberg: How can those guys operate there without any "smell protecti
68.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
Though the effects of both poisons couldn't differ more.. gentle death one might choose in certain circumstances vs death you wouldn't even wish your worst enemy. Recommend reading the article, not only because of this detail and
69.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
> It should be impossible to survive from saved money? Wouldn't that mean that everybody has to work until they die? Come on, it depends on the duration, and it is long stretch from parent poster's thought to your "cannot
70.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
> Of course, this is Oregon, so "storm" here is what some people would probably consider "somewhat windy", and "winter" here means that the temperature is approaching -10°C. Hehe, I hope though his time esti
71.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
Oh the doubts.. anyway I think you can be sure in that industry that this would be considered ahead, and not suddenly realized after the first fire. Curious for reference for that it would take days? There seems to be a lot going on in gett
72.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
I didn't interpret, just said as it is for people who I definitely know how good they are; yours is exactly one explanation why that is so also for fresh vs settled ones that way that I wouldn't (and didn't?) exclude, thr lis
73.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
> A quick review of people on LinkedIn with Open to Work badges seems to paint a different picture than any claim of people being let go are of lower quality. Come on, LinkedIn (CVs) tell nothing. Having been somewhere is often made up a
74.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
Someone here wrote "dysgenic breeding and medical progression" and was immediately so heavily downvoted that he removed that comment quickly. Breeding sounds horrible, and I first needed to google dysgenic, which really makes that
75.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
Geez what? If a kid greater certain age does not change behaviour with parents watching please see a psychologist with it.
76.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
Nope, you got it mixed around..
77.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
This, and even if it maybe does not change much it is not nice as the employee to get that as Christmas present and to take home over the holidays in late Q4.
78.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
Exactly, thought exercise == nice theory, but irrelevant for any practice right now.
79.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
Sorry, but that is unreasonable theory vs practice.. "by my metrics the world could support 150 billion people" but we don't even manage to put 8 altogether at reasonable living standards while we dump the world into a climat
80.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
So what defines the limit,.and what is it? Imo as long as world overshoot day is not beyond December we definitely are.. there are other knobs and factors one could touch to shift that (e.g. our current living standards), but who wants to c
81.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
Max terminal velocity of a skydiver is only 200 km/h.. if this booster is empty this is even maybe slower. Plus real slowness there is also the optical illusion of a very large object in some distance. So just curious, how fast would
82.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
> e.g. dirty energy and chemicals used during their production, or lack of recycling) is overall something that is understated in the grand scheme of things And that is as far your knowledge goes.. just please put real valid numbers to i
83.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
Strange that despite claims that this would have happened multiple times (and people freeze and whatsoever) it didn't even come close yet... not sure if your distress becomes real (it hasb already sometimes despite nuclear..) but in Ge
84.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
Lucky us we are past that already with nuclear, those plants never need replacement, neither heavy subsidies upfront, or also afterwards to dismantle and clean up.. why humans so stupid? Did I forgot that they also never need maintenance, a
85.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
I have the feeling that this is a very high theoretical ebony tower view. E.g., I have a SWC that stores and reads something, and that similarly uses another SWC to do that. If I do an integration test to write and then read something, I te
86.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
Why cant you test third-party code the same as you ideally test first party, by the interface and spec, as black box? Did that, and most often then just happens implicitly anyway in integration testing? Because your code uses third-party as
87.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
Ah ok thanks, did not get that at all.. then more understandable.
88.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
No, that's also not how it should work. Airports have a certain capacity, that's why you use slot allocations at crowded ones. You can say that day was so botched that they blew the one plane in fav of all the others, but that is
89.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
That is satire, right? We can discuss more/better automation and tooling aids and planning aids and whatever tech.. there are so many options you can bring in there before even thinking of any $+#(&#&$ AI in safety critical thi
90.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
3y ago
Depends on some factors, but required and also common is 30/45 minutes, +10% longer flights, before diversion (that fuel not included). Recently experienced a closed airport, needed to divert, and even with chances high that we need to
More ›