Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
throwbadubadu
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
45 ms
·
511.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
4y ago
You two both shouldn't generalize but change perspective at times (:
512.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
4y ago
You complain about abbreviation of omnipresent keywords, but then allow function only two more letters? :D I think proofs well, syntax is overrated and it is all opinionated taste.. > Which one is more readable? Not seeing any difference
513.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
4y ago
Unrelated but LOL, you really cannot place a bicycle lane better and more inviting.. and it ends just in the nowhere into a giantic crossing. "Its a trap" comes to mind. (:
514.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
4y ago
Can't we just bring the internet box down from Big Ben to basement when the sun comes?
515.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
4y ago
That's also an opinion and you are stretching the art comparison quite much, 24fps is a standard and limitation and photo/film most often is to capture some reality and not so much an interpretation of someone else's view in
516.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
4y ago
Wow, that title sounds like poor AIs need lawyers soon, or is it already lobbying for itself? We need the turing police!
517.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
4y ago
Why regressed? You sure can trial them for either kidnapping or murder. But first do the same thing to them they did to the victim, and then you also know for what to trial them. Sounds fair and makes total sense to me.
518.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
4y ago
> here's a 3MB blurry png, for some reason [2]) That blurry png may be the terrain, height map?
519.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
4y ago
Have to raise my hand then to shock you.. what else should the coordinate that is also indicated on the axes mean? > to every square in order, right to left, top to bottom Added to that immediately. shrug But yeah as the title says, on
520.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
4y ago
I think you misinterpret that: your stance is clearly having an opinion about that matter. The author is worried if you just shrug and cannot give any opinion or reasoning (which can be "this is unimportant vs the grand scheme so I don
521.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
4y ago
Sounds like very bad writing and/or reading skills to me - in what state are your docs, requirements, etc? If I just stupidly write down what I would similarly babble (and must be that way, because parsing that takes double time of tha
522.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
4y ago
> They are working on the technology to build nukes and intercontinental missiles... Yes, they are almost there, hurry up. At most a year out!!! (Sad I'm too old and hearing this same theme really since something like 20-30 years...
523.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
4y ago
Strange weather should now slowly not be surprising anymore to anyone .. when will the last ones realize we are kind of doomed since years? This is just the "normal" heatwave now over Europe that occurs in winter.
524.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
4y ago
Big thumps up if this is the question of a climate denier: No we are not having thet because of dumping a lot of CO2 that had been captured over millions of years into the atmosphere, but it is because French's nuclear plants are so ru
525.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
4y ago
The laws intention was totally fine, and if browsers and sites e.g. would have implemented it with a more DNT like approach or just a default opt-in than annoying opt-out approach everyone could have benefitted, but sure AD companies and e
526.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
4y ago
Can I have something of what you are taking too make such nonsense more bearable? Just imagine what our grandgrandchildren will say when they rediscover such a comment, lol. I mean those having those sunshades then up in the sky...
527.
▲
by
throwbadubadu
4y ago
No not your point.. that point was already made in the article, noone is saying here (and no reasonable person would think?!?) that car-free means 100% car free, you are overly nit picking at a term for unknown reason.